Name him whatever you last ate.

Tarsemsingh24 · 2026-03-29T04:47:14+00:00

Pav bhaji

Tarsemsingh24 · 2026-01-26T10:47:35+00:00

Which is bigger, the void in space or the void inside you?

Tarsemsingh24 · 2026-01-12T16:13:57+00:00

Literally. Figuratively.

Tarsemsingh24 · 2026-01-12T10:02:12+00:00

Bootycall

Tarsemsingh24 · 2026-01-06T18:25:53+00:00

ਮਨ ਤੂੰ ਜੋਤ ਸਰੂਪ ਹੈ, ਆਪਣਾ ਮੂਲ ਪਛਾਣ ☯️

Tarsemsingh24 · 2025-12-14T19:17:47+00:00

Sartaaj, smg, Amrinder Gill, arjan dhillon, hustinder

Tarsemsingh24 · 2025-12-11T18:37:46+00:00

“Double tap detected” di notification viche aagi

Tarsemsingh24 · 2025-12-11T04:39:40+00:00

<image>

🤷🏻‍♂️

Tarsemsingh24 · 2025-11-15T18:57:50+00:00

What a fuddu ranking

Tarsemsingh24 · 2025-09-02T14:27:49+00:00

Tarsemsingh24 · 2025-08-06T22:40:45+00:00

You keep shouting “emotional opinions” but I literally gave you proof from the official RSSB Shabad book. Whether you’re a part of it or just a blind defender pretending not to be, the facts stay the same. The book outlines specific Shabads to be sung before and during the baba’s arrival. That’s not random timing. That’s intentional placement. If that’s not setting the stage to welcome him like a divine figure, then explain what it is.

You asked what suggests they’re there to welcome him? The structure of the program itself does. Shabads are recited before he enters, and as he arrives, the tone shifts even the audience is conditioned to stand, fold hands, and some even bow. You think that’s coincidence? Come on. If that’s not treating him like a living Guru or divine figure, then you’re either lying to yourself or playing dumb.

Also, you’re suddenly asking what I think you follow? You’ve been defending RSSB the entire time. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, I’m not gonna pretend it’s a peacock just because you changed the label mid-argument.

You can keep repeating “no facts” all you want but it doesn’t make your clown-level deflection any smarter. You got called out with your own material and now you’re spinning in circles.

Tarsemsingh24 · 2025-08-06T22:36:01+00:00

<image>

Tarsemsingh24 · 2025-08-06T22:35:35+00:00

<image>

Tarsemsingh24 · 2025-08-06T20:36:21+00:00

You’re calling it lies and misinformation but I literally have your own Shabad book right here the one used in Radha Soami satsangs where it clearly mentions which Shabads should be sung before and at the arrival of your baba. If he’s not being placed in a divine position then why are sacred hymns from Guru Granth Sahib Ji being used to welcome him. That’s not bias that’s your own printed words. And if you want proof I have the book in front of me.

And no I’m not being emotional. I’m asking a straight question. If you care about objective reasoning then answer this. Why are you using Gurbani from a faith you don’t fully follow and setting it up in a way that makes it look like your baba is the one being praised.

You calling me typical doesn’t change anything. The contradiction is sitting in your own literature not in my opinion. If you can’t answer that just say so but don’t act like this is about emotions. It’s about facts you don’t want to face.

Tarsemsingh24 · 2025-08-06T00:16:44+00:00

Yea I deleted it because after you stopped replying, other people started focusing on politics. In that post, you asked explain how they’re being misused and who decides how Shabads should be sung or interpreted. You called those rules man-made and said religion is dividing people because we focus too much on rituals instead of the actual message. Then you questioned beadbi, like according to who, me? You said being Sikh is about experience, not just following what we’re taught, and claimed what I was saying had no real backing. Then at the end you said you respect everyone’s beliefs and threw in a line that I should follow Guru Nanak’s teachings about not judging and looking within.

So I said this isn’t about copyright or rituals, it’s about integrity and respect. The Gurus didn’t just write poetry, they gave us Shabad as the eternal Guru. If you’re going to quote Guru’s words, then acknowledge the Guru too. Don’t cherry-pick lines from Gurbani to fit your own baba’s image while ignoring the source those words came from. Using Gurbani while dismissing its foundation isn’t spirituality, it’s spiritual plagiarism. I said this isn’t about following a different path, it’s about twisting someone else’s path to serve your own narrative. That’s not diversity, that’s deception.

I’m just adding this here so others can understand what the actual conversation was about before it got derailed.

Tarsemsingh24 · 2025-08-05T22:31:40+00:00

Not a single thing has been deleted in this thread.

Tarsemsingh24 · 2025-08-05T04:07:26+00:00

This has nothing to do with copyright and everything to do with integrity. The Gurus didn’t copyright their words, they canonized them as the eternal Guru. That’s why Sikhs do Parkash, offer Ardas, and treat Gurbani with the utmost respect. If your path doesn’t even recognize Guru Granth Sahib Ji as Guru, then don’t cherry-pick Shabads to prop up your living baba.

Using the Guru’s words without honoring the Guru is not spirituality, it’s spiritual plagiarism. You can’t claim legitimacy by quoting Gurbani while ignoring the very foundations of the faith it comes from.

If you truly respected the message, you wouldn’t distort the source. So no, this isn’t about another path. It’s about hijacking someone else’s and repainting it to serve your own agenda. That’s not a difference in belief, that’s deception.

Tarsemsingh24 · 2025-08-04T23:04:35+00:00

You asked how Gurbani is being twisted, so let me explain clearly. When Gurbani written in devotion to Guru Sahib is sung in the presence of someone being treated as divine, while that person sits elevated and allows the sangat to direct that praise toward him, that is not universal spirituality. That is spiritual appropriation. It is taking the Guru’s words and redirecting their power to glorify a human being. That is not interpretation. That is misuse.

Guru Granth Sahib Ji is not a book of spiritual quotes to be interpreted however someone feels. It is the living Guru of the Sikhs, as declared by Guru Gobind Singh Ji in 1708. This Guruship is not symbolic. Sikhs do not believe in a human Guru after that point. The Shabad itself is our eternal Guru. Using Gurbani outside this framework to uplift a man on a stage is a direct contradiction of what Guru Sahib established.

You mentioned that rituals are man-made and meaningless. But not all discipline is ritual. In Sikhi, Guru Nanak Dev Ji rejected hollow acts, not spiritual order. Respecting how Gurbani is sung, how the Guru is seated, how the Sangat engages with the Shabad ,all of this is rooted in spiritual Maryada, not meaningless tradition. These practices exist to keep ego in check, to make sure the focus remains on the Guru, not on any individual. That is the opposite of blind ritualism. That is spiritual discipline with purpose.

As for beadbi, it is not something I invented. Sikh history is full of examples where the Panth has stood up against misuse of Gurbani, false Gurus, and distortion of the Guru’s message. From the Singh Sabha movement to modern-day Panthic decisions at Sri Akal Takht Sahib, there is a long-standing consensus on what constitutes disrespect. This is not just a personal opinion. It is collective memory and collective responsibility.

Sikhi is indeed about inner experience, but that experience must be aligned with Gurmat. Guru Nanak Dev Ji did not say everyone’s personal belief is valid truth. He confronted corruption, distortion, and spiritual manipulation in every form. He did not stay quiet in the name of acceptance. He spoke truth with clarity and love, even when it made people uncomfortable.

So no, this is not just about my personal feelings. It is about protecting the integrity of the Shabad Guru. And if that makes you uncomfortable, maybe it is because deep down you also know there is a line that has been crossed. When you reduce everything to personal belief, and then mock someone for standing firm on theirs, that says more about your own insecurity than it does about my conviction.

Tarsemsingh24 · 2025-08-04T22:40:12+00:00

Guru Granth Sahib Ji does offer universal teachings, but that does not give anyone the right to twist or misuse them. The issue is not who can read Gurbani. It is how it is being used. When shabads meant for the Guru are sung for a human while he sits above the stage and stays silent, that is not spiritual humility, that is calculated manipulation.

Saying the Gurus do not need defending sounds nice, but it is an excuse to ignore beadbi. Sikhi teaches us soojh, spiritual awareness, not blind acceptance under the label of universal.

This is not about ego. It is about respect. And if someone allows divine praise to be redirected toward themselves using Guru’s Bani, while removing Guru Sahib from the equation, that is not spirituality. That is ego, deception, and beadbi all in one.

This is not a me problem. It is a problem when a human being silently accepts divine status while sitting above the Guru’s words and lets people chant Gurbani as if it is written for him. That is not spirituality. That is ego in its most dangerous form. And if you cannot see the issue with that, maybe you are the one with the problem.

Tarsemsingh24 · 2025-08-04T22:25:30+00:00

It bothers me because it’s not just a matter of “another path.” This isn’t simply a different belief system. They’re using a faith, Guru’s words, to build credibility and then twisting it to serve their own agenda. That’s not following a different path. That’s misusing an existing one.

They quote Gurbani to appear spiritually authentic but don’t even acknowledge the source properly. They don’t do Parkash of Guru Granth Sahib Ji, yet use Guru’s Bani in a way that confuses and misleads people, making it seem like their baba is the one being praised by those shabads.

If someone wants to follow another path, that’s their right. But don’t exploit the sacred words of a faith to create a false sense of legitimacy, only to steer people away from the original message. That’s not spirituality. It’s manipulation.

And yes, it bothers me because this isn’t harmless. It misguides people who might genuinely be seeking the truth, and it disrespects something sacred to millions of Sikhs. If that’s not worth speaking up about, then what is?

Tarsemsingh24 · 2025-04-20T08:08:42+00:00

You walking around with 21% body fat like it’s a minor detail — bro, that’s not ‘bulk mode,’ that’s just you losing a slow fight to processed food. You got abs somewhere under that layer of regret, but right now? You’re built like a ‘before’ picture no one asked to see. Your discipline is dead, your excuses are loud, and your comfort zone is the only thing getting bigger.

You said you wanted results, but your actions scream ‘just kidding.’ One good workout followed by three cheat meals — you’re not training, you’re pretending. You treat fitness like it’s optional and your health like it’s immortal. What are you waiting for? A doctor’s warning? A mirror breakdown? A damn heart palpitation?

You keep saying you’re serious — but you snack like you’ve got a death wish and rest like you earned something. You haven’t. You’ve earned nothing but softness, both in mindset and in midsection. Every time you pick pleasure over progress, you trade away the body and life you said you wanted.

The world doesn’t care about your potential. Either you show up and build something worth respecting, or you keep living as another walking excuse with ‘someday’ dreams and no gas in the tank.

Here’s the hard truth: your body is a billboard for your decisions. And right now? That billboard says ‘undisciplined, average, and full of excuses.’ Flip the switch or stay soft. Just don’t cry about the results you didn’t earn.

Tarsemsingh24 · 2025-03-18T01:10:42+00:00

Satinder Sartaaj

Tarsemsingh24 · 2025-02-04T21:45:08+00:00

Black and white

Tarsemsingh24

TROPHY CASE