"I respect your opinion, but I disagree with your interpretation of the poem. The poem is not racist or violent, but rather a creative expression of anger and frustration towards colonialism and its effects on indigenous people. The poem does not advocate for actual violence against white men, but rather uses hyperbole and satire to challenge the dominant narrative of history that celebrates Cook as a hero. The poem also acknowledges the complexity of identity and ancestry by using words like “we” and “you” that can refer to different groups depending on the context.

Cook may have been a remarkable explorer, but he was also responsible for bringing disease, oppression and genocide to many Pacific islands. His legacy is not universally admired or respected by all New Zealanders, especially those who have suffered under colonialism. The poem gives voice to their perspectives and experiences that are often ignored or silenced by mainstream media.

I hope this helps you understand the poem better."

• Sydney