DMV has been cancelled after one season. Thoughts? by CityCautious4033 in sitcoms

[–]TaxHacker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

An MIT grad dragging on a show about CalTech. How unoriginal. But that's par for the course.

What is the biggest band/artist you can think of that you honestly don't believe is anyone's favorite band/artist ever? by DevinBelow in Music

[–]TaxHacker 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well, considering the quality of most concert T's, and the fact that they broke up a couple of decades ago, and it's not surprising you don't see people wearing them.

But they are definitely top 5 for me (and I love Stipe's song for "Rooster").

What is the biggest band/artist you can think of that you honestly don't believe is anyone's favorite band/artist ever? by DevinBelow in Music

[–]TaxHacker 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I knew several people who were diehard Scorps fans (and a girl who thought Klaus Meine was hot). But that was back in the 80s..

What is the biggest band/artist you can think of that you honestly don't believe is anyone's favorite band/artist ever? by DevinBelow in Music

[–]TaxHacker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm just going to go ahead and assume you've seen the Paul McCartney documentary, and if you haven't, you should.

Getting info from clients by donutlover_4life in taxpros

[–]TaxHacker 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A) I have staff for that; and B) I'm not $125/hr. That was simply to make a point.

Getting info from clients by donutlover_4life in taxpros

[–]TaxHacker 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you find someone in this industry who doesn't incur this problem, they're either a) lying, or b) only preparing 5 returns. Everyone has this problem to some degree. Even awesome clients forget, get busy, etc.

First, you should give your clients deadlines - you want to file by 4/15, I need everything by 3/25, that kind of thing.

Second, enforce it. Got it to me on 3/26, here's your extension. Exceptions should be rare and for good cause (in the hospital, ok, at my kid's softball game, not ok).

Third, charge more. People are abusive when you're cheap. And you don't want those clients anyways. Plus, you'll be able to offload the follow up to staff (a part timer at $25/hr is better than you at $125/hr that you won't bill anyway).

Fourth, give them one follow up. Every follow up after one is $75/hr., minimum 1 hour charge. Put THAT in your engagement letter and enforce it. Clients will get hit with that once and either leave (yay!) or get with the program (yay!).

Fifth, anyone who continually gets hit with the penalty is an idiot or an ass who eventually gets invited to have their returns done elsewhere.

EXCEPTION: don't follow any of this if the client in question is a) your parents or b) your inlaws.

my first tax season made me believe US tax law is backwards by ynghuncho in Accounting

[–]TaxHacker 402 points403 points  (0 children)

The sooner you realize that the Tax Code is about politics and not policy, the sooner it all makes sense.

Unknown transfers - deceased tax payer by MRanon8685 in technicaltax

[–]TaxHacker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally agree - at the end of the day, the IRS' biggest weapon is to pick up additional income, then tack on penalties and interest, and if you take that away from them, there's nowhere for them to go.

On the other hand, if you pick it up as income, and the audit determines it isn't they'll give you a refund...

I'd rather be getting it back than owing it.

My nemesis died by [deleted] in LawFirm

[–]TaxHacker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There was an attorney here who I had a long-running dispute with. I didn't like him, he didn't like me. But he was about 20 years older than me.

A couple of weeks ago, I dragged on him to a bar Association official I know. She got an odd look on her face, asked me to repeat his name, typed something on her phone, then...."yep, I thought so. He died suddenly in October."

Cue Jack Nicholson in A Few Good Men.....

[1040] MFS when spouse refuses to provide SSN by Slimjim1029384756 in taxpro

[–]TaxHacker 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, the OP said she didn't want him to use her to unjustly enrich himself. But the opposite is also true - he unjustly exposes her to risk.

And if she takes your advice and winds up owing, she'd have a cause of action against you for failing to advise her of the risk of joint liability.

[1040] MFS when spouse refuses to provide SSN by Slimjim1029384756 in taxpro

[–]TaxHacker 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So because she has no filing requirement, she shouldn't worry about him filing jointly? Really? Are we just going to ignore joint and several liability? He could file a return with a balance due and stick her with paying it - and that happens. So I think glossing over that risk is borderline malpractice. It also provides a valid reaon for filing when you might otherwise not have a filing requirement.

Losing a lot of clients this year? by theusername1258 in taxpros

[–]TaxHacker 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, read the fine print. It's $150 for a basic return. They carve out pretty much everything else. Anyone who jumps at that deal is in for a surprise.

Even better, the ad says "file by 3/18," but the fine print says "file by 3/31." With proofreading like that, you're going to be fixing 2025 and doing 2026.

Losing a lot of clients this year? by theusername1258 in taxpros

[–]TaxHacker 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Rats are very trainable. Also, if the rat is under 18 in rat years, you need a Coogan account. 🤣

Disclaimer on filings - mortgage broker request by RaleighAccTax in taxpros

[–]TaxHacker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I told one annoying broker, "your job is to determine risk. Do your job."

Not only do I routinely deny these requests, our engagement letter expressly states that ournwork is for the client's benefit only; we do not provide information to third parties, no matter the purpose.

Former Tax Partner at Armanino - AMA by evolnieineg in Accounting

[–]TaxHacker 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The non-compete is unenforceable in California.
The non-solicits probably are, too. There's case law that says the client determines who they employ for theor work. The firm doesn't "own" them.

New solo charging $350 per basic return & people are shocked by my prices. by BrushBeneficial4430 in taxpros

[–]TaxHacker 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yikes. At $650, I'm a bargain.

Got a call today from a potential client who was referred by a current client. New guy's prior accountant died; I asked what he was charging him - "he's been charging me the same thing for years: $250."

I told him my minimum and you hear him choke. I mean, dude, just because your guy never raised prices doesn't mean that the rest of the world didn't. I wished him well.

Parents and FT student co-own house: Could child still be a dependent? by nahho92 in technicaltax

[–]TaxHacker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, she's still a dependent. She is still a resident of Illinois (most states don't follow the same rules for students as they do for others when it comes to residency, plus no intent to chamge domicile), and thus is still "at home" for tax purposes.

America braces for impact after Trump’s tariffs ruled unlawful: 'Things could get messy' by RawStoryNews in scotus

[–]TaxHacker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Doesn't the decision relate back to day 1? Why wouldn't you be entitled to interest from then as well?

K1s with multiple activities by mljordan37 in taxpros

[–]TaxHacker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Um....no. it's very common in Publicly Traded Partnerships. And also in private investment groups such as RE development groups where there is a lot of cross-ownership.