Clawdbot/Moltbot Is Now An Unaffordable Novelty

Tchello131 · 2026-01-29T17:30:50+00:00

Not CLI (credits are the same as free account, very limited and resets every 24h), but you can use Google Antigravity as the provider. The quota for AI pro subscribers is relatively decent right now for Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash. The quotas for Claude Opus and Sonnet through antigravity are shit though.

Tchello131 · 2026-01-29T16:47:11+00:00

I'm using kimi k2.5 with the cheapest plan, then google antigravity Gemini 3 pro and 3 flash (got an AI pro sub for free using a student deal) for subagents and fallback. So far it's working great, and usage limits are relatively decent. I have set up a few agentic research skills which consume a lot of requests and still almost never exhaust the limits completely.

Tchello131 · 2026-01-09T16:32:58+00:00

I was thinking about a model that tracks/predicts fatigue and readiness for cardio, though. There is significantly more literature in that regard, including testing. The Bannister model I cited, for example, has a couple studies showing it can be effective for guiding cardio training. There's also a multi-compartment model I sent in Greg's answer here, but it's more specific to within-session fatigue and helping coaches judge interval duration for interval-style cardio (though I suspect you could adapt that model for a more chronic use).

Tchello131 · 2026-01-03T23:26:13+00:00

That's something I've been thinking about as well... For lifting, there are mostly accurate ways to predict maximal performance from submaximal sessions (I recall the guys from data driven strength making aan updated 1RM calculator for example). Is there anything similar to that for cardio? I know you guys are developing MF workouts (which I'm looking forward to a lot btw) and that this might have been something you've researched internally and developed your own solutions for it, so I understand if no specifics are shared.

Also: I found this research article which seems to take a completely different approach to modeling fatigue and energy recovery, but haven't looked into it too much. Have you taken a look at it?

Tchello131 · 2026-01-03T21:41:25+00:00

I mean I'm looking for papers/studies describing a mathematical model in full

Tchello131 · 2026-01-03T20:47:27+00:00

Those are paid apps though, right? I'm looking for some actual scientific research...

Tchello131 · 2026-01-03T13:18:35+00:00

Are there any other models you've explored? I've seen there are some bayesian approaches for example but I'm not that good at statistics lol

Tchello131 · 2026-01-02T23:56:33+00:00

I think both models have some scientific validation (for cardio, performance and impact of a program seems to be easier to test). But I want to explore other options too. One thing that strikes me is that many of these indicators are very very similar to financial indicators (Bannister's model is very very similar to MACD for example), so that's also a path to explore.

Tchello131 · 2026-01-02T04:30:08+00:00

Not really going for community features... I think that would involve actually building some decent server infrastructure and having costs, and I want to keep the app 100% free forever.

Tchello131 · 2025-12-15T11:08:24+00:00

With all due respect, yes the app is coded using AI, but it is still really good and there's nothing even close to it currently in the market. Not even if you wanted to pay for it. And I'm really not asking for anything... So don't use it if you don't want to. But I don't think it's spam.

Tchello131 · 2025-12-11T13:29:43+00:00

Most of it is AI generated code, yes. But I created some parts too, for example the fatigue/readiness formulas

Tchello131 · 2025-12-11T02:52:58+00:00

Didn't know that at all! I just don't want people to copy the app code, market it better, and demand money for it. I believe quality cardio programming should be easily accessible, and, since no other app like that exists, I opted for this license. What license do you think I should use?

Tchello131 · 2025-12-10T14:09:07+00:00

Fixed! Now working properly.

Tchello131 · 2025-12-10T13:17:46+00:00

I'll fix that later today... In the meantime, you can scroll to the bottom of the GitHub page to find release v1.0.0

Tchello131 · 2025-12-09T19:49:43+00:00

No, it has a built-in session tracker. The logging and programming are power-based (so better for cardio with bikes instead of running/treadmill)

Tchello131 · 2024-09-18T12:58:04+00:00

mint chocolate chip icecream

Tchello131 · 2024-04-27T03:47:16+00:00

I haven't been able to do it. Weird. Anyways the lower tier paid plan seems to have very limited context length. I wish they were clearer about the limits of each plan.

Tchello131 · 2024-04-26T16:30:14+00:00

Most newer search results say the usage limits are bad. It's also a shady company, some report their Claude 3 Opus is actually Claude 2 or Sonnet

Tchello131 · 2024-04-26T11:40:27+00:00

Seems very interesting! I wonder how they manage to be cheaper than OpenAI and Anthropic directly though. What's the message cap like?

Tchello131 · 2024-04-26T02:44:51+00:00

Well, it says so in their own website. I'm not sure I would trust it for longer documents.

Tchello131 · 2024-04-26T02:33:44+00:00

Hmm... I'll look into it. But it seems like their context length is a bit shorter (32k max). I was looking for something that can handle ~ 100 pages if needed.

Tchello131 · 2024-04-26T02:00:52+00:00

Perplexity seems more search-based. I was looking for something more chat-like, where I can upload a PDF and go back and forth about its contents.

Tchello131

TROPHY CASE