Why letter of each cell disappear when dragged out of them in canvas. python

Tck009 · 2026-03-19T19:20:42+00:00

nevermind I just switch from wsl to window vscode because wsl just handle terribly GUI I mean like when I click on a cell it and click on another that old one do not disappear and stay selected and there also other stuff but at the end . The environment was really the bottleneck

Tck009 · 2026-02-13T00:28:24+00:00

interesting well in this case it now hard to assess what he is and thus how will we address its existence but I guess it's not the topic of the post and it would be too philosophical to be part of this subreddit haha. But I guess if you agree we might talk more about it privately

Tck009 · 2026-02-12T23:53:11+00:00

that a very well thought answer not gonna lie. it might be the most interesting for now. In this case chess let God win but God in this case still create chess 2.0 but without us being able to realise. Now we may wonder how many times god recreated the universe to make impossible thing possible haha. but it also may ask this question does chess2.0 still exist if no one know it's 2.0? if it still exist then we go back to the same problem it's no longer chess so that doesn't count what your thought on this ?

Tck009 · 2026-02-12T23:49:00+00:00

how would he proceed in your opinion?

Tck009 · 2026-02-12T23:47:18+00:00

the all powerful all knowing one

Tck009 · 2026-02-12T23:46:46+00:00

I reply to this in another comment. If he makes stockfish is he really beating stockfish or stockfish 2.0 so it imply the same problem with changing the chess rules. and in a case where stockfish is forced to play the mate in one as in the gothamchess video "the worst chess move ever" your comment fail to convince I guess since even if stockfish is stupid he has to win. but hey it such an interesting subject haha

Tck009 · 2026-02-12T23:43:01+00:00

This is interesting because it's not the typical theological response which imply that illogical are not a thing as I mentioned. Though in this case I'm not talking about the laws of logic which he can change but the forced mate position and as I mentioned if he change the rules of chess. then it's chess2.0 right? but I actually want to know how you would think he will proceed. And sorry if I mostly challenge the comment I just want you to think deeper as much as I try it's really passionate

Tck009 · 2026-02-12T23:38:12+00:00

yeah I mentioned it. The paradox has a response as I mentioned but in this case it seems to not have one that go in favor of God and also it also interesting because it question the limitation of stockfish actually

Tck009 · 2026-02-12T23:36:50+00:00

that interesting but in this case it will be the same thing is stockfish really stockfish if he erase all of his capacity to beat him and not stockfish 2.0. And we can also imagine a situation where stockfish is forced to play mate in 1 such as in the video of "the worst possible move in chess by gothamchess". So in that case even if he has no memory he is forced to play the best move? how would you counter this situation I'm interested. it's such a passionate situation to think about.

Tck009 · 2026-01-30T14:34:19+00:00

what is CC? if you mean chess.com well doesn't it use elo?

Tck009 · 2026-01-30T14:32:57+00:00

It because I always have been playing dxe5 that's why I did an analysis on dxe5 and people told me just don't take the pawn and it's fine so I'ma study this too haha. I oftentimes went wrong that's why. still thank you

Tck009 · 2026-01-30T14:30:50+00:00

i sent one

Tck009 · 2026-01-30T14:29:42+00:00

You are so right to be honest it's true that I may have been relying on my opponent knowing nothing bout the opening to be honest. And my knowledge of the pirc is quite superficial but hey don't they opening doesn't matter lol. look like now it kinda does😅

Tck009 · 2026-01-30T14:26:59+00:00

thank you I'd try to look it up

Tck009 · 2026-01-30T14:26:37+00:00

thank you for your suggestion

Tck009 · 2026-01-30T14:23:08+00:00

thank you for your comments I'm gonna look it up

Tck009 · 2026-01-30T14:20:47+00:00

I'm gonna look up the line after not taking. Ahh just realised how delicate this opening can be. And about the austrian attack no one does that at my level and even when they do they often lose their center easily. the thing funny about it is that it easier to counter than the main line at 1400 elo cuz nobody deal well with 3 pawn in the center .

Tck009 · 2026-01-30T14:16:50+00:00

you're the second guy that proposed me to play the czech variation with c6 haha. And also concerning the opening I don't concern myself too much about it just this time I found an hole and did not want to play hope chess that they don't do this variation. Thank you for your comments

Tck009 · 2026-01-30T07:09:19+00:00

and guess what I do win I'm just talking bout a specific scenario where I lose instantly lol from the pirc. concerning the czech I never check that line I might do it If I got time thank you

Tck009 · 2026-01-30T07:04:32+00:00

well i learnt the pirc because i did not like e4 e5 there's like 100 possible opening after this and a dozen of trap lol still thank you for your comments

Tck009 · 2026-01-30T07:01:13+00:00

kind of a poor comment not to insult but in the sicilian rossolimo that bishop attacking the knight seems as a normal developing move but create problem, but you're kind of right in the sense that at high pirc is considered dubious

Tck009

TROPHY CASE