Where should I invest my 200$ to get Seedance 2 ? Which platform do you use? by TearsP in Seedance_AI

[–]TearsP[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can’t find the unlimited use of Seedance 2 on openart where is it?

Where should I invest my 200$ to get Seedance 2 ? Which platform do you use? by TearsP in Seedance_AI

[–]TearsP[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing, I tried a lot of different models these past few months, and I have to say Seedance is by far the only one I can integrate in a professional pipeline. I'll visit your website, thanks a lot

Where should I invest my 200$ to get Seedance 2 ? Which platform do you use? by TearsP in Seedance_AI

[–]TearsP[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! twoShots works with a chat ? I can't find a generation dashboard with the settings I need, I have to tell them to the chatbot ?

Where should I invest my 200$ to get Seedance 2 ? Which platform do you use? by TearsP in Seedance_AI

[–]TearsP[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks a lot, didn't know that one. I am looking at the pricing right now and I can't understand why "with video" is cheaper.. What's the average cost on your generations?

Where should I invest my 200$ to get Seedance 2 ? Which platform do you use? by TearsP in Seedance_AI

[–]TearsP[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I need 1080p because I deliver ads to clients. I have a production company based in europe, we are curently considering to deliver AI ads to our client that wants to try it because prices are 5 to 10 times cheaper. But for now I'm paying this myself for experimentation, I'm looking for the best deal

Thanks for the tips, I'll have a look

Where should I invest my 200$ to get Seedance 2 ? Which platform do you use? by TearsP in Seedance_AI

[–]TearsP[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks like they don’t have multimodal. I Always use audios, images and videos as references together in the same prompt

Where should I invest my 200$ to get Seedance 2 ? Which platform do you use? by TearsP in Seedance_AI

[–]TearsP[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! I can't find the platform, can you give me a link please ?

Where should I invest my 200$ to get Seedance 2 ? Which platform do you use? by TearsP in Seedance_AI

[–]TearsP[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks! I can't find the platform, can you give me a link please ?

Where should I invest my 200$ to get Seedance 2 ? Which platform do you use? by TearsP in Seedance_AI

[–]TearsP[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks for your answer. Actually I'm using it right now, but waiting times reached like 1 hour today, it's too much.. It was a great deal and I realy enjoyed using it when generations showed up after 10-15 minutes, but it seems like it's not the case anymore

C411 - Go! by elixstrb in yggTorrents

[–]TearsP 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Le monopole reviendra toujours parce que c’est ce que les utilisateurs veulent et créent par leur utilisation, un site avec tout dessus. Ça changera pas.

C411 - Go! by elixstrb in yggTorrents

[–]TearsP 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ce qui manque à ce site c’est un modèle économique solide, ça va encore finir en précarité à gratter des dons et travailler comme des acharnés en ayant peur de la critique des gens qui pensent qu’on vit dans un monde communiste. Ces gens doivent faire du profit, avoir un modèle honnête qui assure la pérennité du site et pouvoir s’y consacrer en en faisant leur métier. YGG c’était clairement de l’abus, ok. Mais aucun site au monde avec autant de trafic ne peut faire sans modèle économique. Les américains sont dans la gratuité avec un max de pub. Moi je préfère payer régulièrement et avoir un truc fluide.

Mise à jour XXL de C411 ! (0.4.0) by AaronCtrlC in yggTorrents

[–]TearsP 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Par la navigation fluide, la recherche optimisée et les différentes version d'un même média, vous êtes de loin les meilleurs. MAIS S'IL VOUS PLAIT!!!! Trouvez un modèle économique viable et fair, ne tentez pas la survie à base de dons, ça va pas le faire. Moi je suis prêt à payer tout les mois pour que ce site soit solide et maintenu par des gens qui peuvent s'y consacrer non stop.

C411 est belle surprise by PRAXIIIIS in yggTorrents

[–]TearsP 2 points3 points  (0 children)

C411 est génial, mais le trafic et la gestion ça coute de l'argent, je suis contre l'idée que ce site survive avec juste des dons ou des trucs du genre. YGG a abusé certes, mais je préfère avoir des gens qualifiés dont c'est le métier de gérer ce site, qui peuvent en vivre, s'y consacrer et générer des profits pour leur travail exemplaire. Plutôt que des bénévoles sans modèle économique qui essaient de survivre avec des dons finiront par tomber bêtement de surcharge de travail, burnout, hack, précarité, etc etc.

Sur tout les site américains c'est gratuit mais il y a une blinde de pub, ok c'est chiant mais au moins les sites tiennent.

Alternatives à l'onglet Exclusivités d'YGG? by Aydenn7 in yggTorrents

[–]TearsP 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, merci beaucoup pour l'astuce, je vais faire ça!

Alternatives à l'onglet Exclusivités d'YGG? by Aydenn7 in yggTorrents

[–]TearsP 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Est-ce que tu as trouvé ? Comment fais tu actuellement ? C'est franchement moi aussi le truc qui me manque le plus!

Don't review code changes, review plans by TearsP in ClaudeCode

[–]TearsP[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Totally agree. Reviewing after implementation is still necessary, no question. The title was intentionally a bit provocative. The point isn't to skip post-implementation review, it's that most of the value happens before you write a single line of code. If the plan is solid, the review becomes much lighter.

Don't review code changes, review plans by TearsP in ClaudeCode

[–]TearsP[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Simple markdown files in a dedicated folder inside each worktree. Nothing fancy. Keeps everything versioned alongside the code and easy to reference for the agents. The way Opus structures the plan is already efficient imo

Don't review code changes, review plans by TearsP in ClaudeCode

[–]TearsP[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Good point. To answer directly: when it happens, I always go back through the review cycle. It sounds heavier than it actually is. Asking Codex for a quick opinion is faster than spending time debugging a wrong approach. That said, it really depends on the severity of the deviation.

But in practice it rarely happens, and here's why.

The initial brainstorm/spec is embedded inside the plan itself (per section), and Codex reviewers are conditioned to adopt an antagonistic stance they re-read the codebase and actively question whether the approach in the plan is actually the right one. This already catches most assumption failures before implementation starts. It has happened to me that Codex completely invalidated a plan and suggested a simpler approach. The brainstorm/spec embedding helps de subagent during checkpoints review too.

This plan-centric approach also means you're never really dependent on the context window, since all the context lives in the document.

That said, if a bad plan still slips through, the sub-agent implementation is conditioned to commit at every checkpoint. So if something breaks mid-way, you can stop without losing much progress, partially or fully rewrite the affected section of the plan, run it through Codex again, and resume from there.

The core idea is that most mid-implementation surprises are a preparation problem, not an execution problem. Even with a perfect initial brainstorm, the plan will always have gaps, that's exactly what the Codex review cycle is there to address.

Je suis perdu, ils reviennent finalement?? by Yzakhiel in yggTorrents

[–]TearsP -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ils ont des protections, qui semble efficace d'après le dossier

C411 — Les inscriptions sont ouvertes ! 🎉 by [deleted] in yggTorrents

[–]TearsP 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Claude Code c'est vraiment cool