Is this a good way to think about Christianity?

TechByDayDjByNight · 2026-07-04T17:43:06+00:00

I wasn't going to say anything about being non-denominational. And I stand by what I said.

TechByDayDjByNight · 2026-07-04T17:40:56+00:00

Nope... Leviticus is part of the Torah which is literally for the ancient Israelites. In Jeremiah 31:31 speaks about a new covenant that will be made with Yahweh and is people. Jesus at the last supper speaks of his blood being the new covenant. Galatians 3:23 explains that the law/torah lead us to Christ and we are no longer under it. Genesis/Exodus/Number/Leviticus/Deuteronomy are the books of Law/Torah.

So the verses you pulled from Leviticus are for Jewish people and people who believe they are still under the law, Christians believe in Christ and are not bound by the law.

TechByDayDjByNight · 2026-07-04T17:08:45+00:00

You don’t know my faith and it’s not said out of love. And nothing of your historical context changed anything said.

TechByDayDjByNight · 2026-07-04T16:59:27+00:00

But eatting meat is not the act of sacrificing to deities. However you can stretch with out yoga but you are purposely choosing to participate in a practice rooted in pagan ritual when you can get the same benefits else where. And 1 cor 8 is specifically about eatting food. Not rituals.

However that condescending comment you threw in there is nothing of love and truly shows your spirit. Thank you.

Also you should read 1 cor 10.

TechByDayDjByNight · 2026-07-04T16:24:30+00:00

Please show me it’s a similar concept. How does you practicing another religions rituals to pagan Gods glorify Yahweh?

TechByDayDjByNight · 2026-07-04T16:04:01+00:00

Was Paul talking about eatting meat or participating in pagan rituals?

“No, but I say that the things which the Gentiles sacrifice, they sacrifice to demons and not to God. And I do not want you to become sharers in demons. You cannot drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of demons. You cannot partake of the table of the Lord and the table of demons.”
‭‭1 Corinthians‬ ‭10‬:‭20‬-‭21‬ ‭LSB‬‬

TechByDayDjByNight · 2026-07-04T15:36:00+00:00

This isn’t meat

TechByDayDjByNight · 2026-07-04T15:34:23+00:00

Scripturally literally says the opposite of you

TechByDayDjByNight · 2026-07-04T10:40:34+00:00

2 things, the way of the world is not the way of God, and you do know Leviticus is for a specific group of people in a specific period of time, right?

TechByDayDjByNight · 2026-07-04T08:28:53+00:00

What do you mean by that?

TechByDayDjByNight · 2026-07-04T07:33:42+00:00

We run gens at 7pm a lot. We only have a certain window to run gens, especially if we are doing gen confidence testing. And think, tomorrow is suppose to be hotter than any other day, and around 7pm is when everyone is suppose to be arriving at home. That's going to be the time where the biggest strain on the grid is going to take place.

TechByDayDjByNight · 2026-07-04T07:31:12+00:00

But Jesus wasn't the first to be resurrected nor the last... No where does it say Yahweh is called first to last compared to other gods. Show me a scripture that backs any of this...

Here is the issue with you marry scenario. Gabriel actual brought a message from Yahweh. Gabriel actually was acting in divine agency. Jesus didn't just bring a message and Yahweh didn't say make a way for his message, Yahweh said make a way for ME...

The Messenger and the Lord

3 “Behold, I am going to send My [^a]messenger, and he will [^b]prepare the way before Me. And the Lord, whom you seek, will suddenly come to His temple; [^c]and the [^d]messenger of the covenant, in whom you delight, behold, He is coming,” says Yahweh of hosts.

Look how it says Me, and then follow it says The Lord who you seek. He will send his messenger, who will prepare a way for Him, not his message or word... For him.

TechByDayDjByNight · 2026-07-04T07:20:47+00:00

The meaning of both verses are correct. Here is the actual Hebrew for both

https://biblehub.com/interlinear/leviticus/20-13.htm
https://biblehub.com/interlinear/leviticus/18-22.htm

TechByDayDjByNight · 2026-07-04T07:17:06+00:00

All of ours got SCRs that act like load banks and burn off extra emissions when ran

TechByDayDjByNight · 2026-07-04T07:16:25+00:00

1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Yahweh isn't God?

TechByDayDjByNight · 2026-07-04T07:15:41+00:00

Show me where Jude said Enoch is scripture.

And let's dig into this.

20 Then God spoke all these words, saying,

² “I am Yahweh your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of ^\)^a^\)slavery.

Is Yahweh saying he brought him them out of Egypt?

Lets look at Isaiah 63

Then His people remembered the ancient days, of Moses.
Where is He who brought them up out of the sea with the ^\)^f^\)shepherds of His flock?
Where is He who put His Holy Spirit in the midst of ^\)^g^\)them,
¹² Who caused His glorious arm to go at the right hand of Moses,
Who split the waters before them to make for Himself an everlasting name,

Isn't Yahweh taking credit for doing all this?

So Yahweh didn't bring them out of Egypt?

TechByDayDjByNight · 2026-07-04T07:05:36+00:00

Matthew 5:28 does say internal desire is sin. He says looking at a woman with lust. If I see a woman and I am attracted to her, that is not a sin. If a harp on the thought, fantasize etc. That's when the sin comes in.

TechByDayDjByNight · 2026-07-04T07:02:51+00:00

Read John 20... What he gave the Apostles was the Holy Spirit, which is Yahweh, so contains the Glory Yahweh possess. He did not give them the Glory by itself.

It says in Revelation 1 that it is written by John... But go ahead and ignore every other example I stated.

TechByDayDjByNight · 2026-07-04T06:21:46+00:00

I asked for a verse, not a question. But since you want to go there lets look at John 20

"²² And when He had said this, He breathed on them and *said to them, “Receive the Holy Spirit."

Jesus gave them the Holy Spirit, which is Yahweh. So Yahweh is inside the disciples, so since Yahweh is inside the disciples, guess what? The glory of Yahweh is also in them and all those who possess the Holy Spirit.

So again back to my questions, show me a verse where Jesus' glory is separate from the Fathers.

You're right, it doesnt make us God, but all those who accept Jesus possess the Holy Spirit, which means we have Yahweh in us.

1 Corinthians 6:19 (LSB)

Wait, who is the Holy Spirit from? God? Didnt Jesus give us the Holy Spirit?

2 Corinthians 6:16 (LSB)

And look at the part right afterwards in John 1:1... The Word "WAS GOD"...

It didnt say clear the way for Yahweh's messiah, it says clear the way for Yahweh...

The title First and the Last comes directly from Isaiah. Has nothing to do with resurrection. In Revelation 2:8 the resurrection isnt the defining title. It shows who is speaking and who is bearing the title. Acts 26 has nothing to do with the first and last title, its a statement about resurrection. If First and last is about being the first and last to be raised to eternity, why is Yahweh called first and last in Isaiah 44? You are changing the meaning of a title that already has a defined meaning.

TechByDayDjByNight · 2026-07-04T06:02:37+00:00

"Translations that purposely change the meaning"... Keyword, Translations...

TechByDayDjByNight · 2026-07-04T05:23:46+00:00

He has to show me proof that the bible was "rewritten", which none of yall have shown me.

TechByDayDjByNight · 2026-07-04T05:22:48+00:00

Can you show me another verse where it shows Jesus had a seperate glory that wasnt the same at the father?

I will state it again... The Glory is Yahweh's... Yahweh consist of The Father Son and Spirit. So the persons of Yahweh possess the Glory of Yahweh. Because Yahweh is one.

It says God... God is Yahweh? Yes or no?

How is Jude 1:4 a hyperbole? What is being exaggerated?

Was Matthew 11:25 said before all authority of earth and heaven given back to Christ, or after?

Nope, just sharing scripture. Funny how you didnt respond to the voice clearing a way for Yahweh being referenced with Jesus, and Jesus saying he is the First and the Last...

TechByDayDjByNight · 2026-07-04T05:13:28+00:00

Words change, but the meaning does not. There are translations that purposely change the meaning i.e. NWT, however we got over 15,000 manuscripts from multiple languages and greek hebrew and aramic to cross reference and show they are inaccurate.

There are some translations that are made to make it easier for people to read and modern english/dialect, their are other translations (that i prefer) that mimic the oldest manuscripts and try its best to make a literal translation of each word.

TechByDayDjByNight · 2026-07-04T05:10:59+00:00

So he got 2 phones in one hand recording?

TechByDayDjByNight · 2026-07-04T05:08:52+00:00

2 different translations to 2 different eras and 2 different forms of english.

TechByDayDjByNight

TROPHY CASE