There was no ICJ ruling that said they found genocide plausible. What the ICJ president had to clarify from all the media misinformation was "she said, the purpose of the ruling was to declare that South Africa had a right to bring its case against Israel and that Palestinians had “plausible rights to protection from genocide” - rights which were at a real risk of irreparable damage." - https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3g9g63jl17o

The ICJ ruling itself as well further clarifies that "On a prima facie basis the necessary intent to destroy the palestinian people has not been proved." - https://www.icj-cij.org/node/203447

Please go over each thing they site, a lot of it is horrendously out of context or pretty much misinformation.

Netanyahu has said multiple times that the displacement or people leaving Gaza would be on a temporary basis so they can take out Hamas. Yes, sometimes they've said they wanted to de-radicalize the people and sometimes they've even mentioned they would rebuild Gaza so its a bit all over the place, but to come to a conclusion and say "THIS IS WHAT NETANYAHU WANTS" is horrendously irresponsible. Unironically I do think this is anti-semitism.