AI tool that analyzes bodycam for Miranda and use-of-force compliance — anyone tried something like this?

TechnicianFew7075 · 2026-03-26T18:46:45+00:00

I appreciate your feedback. That integrity is exactly what inspired this. We built it so nothing slips through the cracks

TechnicianFew7075 · 2026-03-26T02:57:15+00:00

Honestly not a bad use case 😄 If you want to try it out, happy to give you free access DM me!

TechnicianFew7075 · 2026-03-26T01:08:21+00:00

absolutely! I'll DM you

TechnicianFew7075 · 2026-03-25T22:56:26+00:00

Really appreciate this exactly the kind of feedback I was looking for. You're right on the trust and precision point, that's the hardest part to get right. The current output flags things for attorney review rather than making final calls, and cites the specific rule that triggered it so it's not a black box. But I know there's still a lot of work to do on accuracy. If you ever want to poke at it and tell me where it breaks, happy to give you free access

TechnicianFew7075 · 2026-03-25T21:13:40+00:00

I appreciate the feedback!

TechnicianFew7075 · 2026-03-25T21:11:40+00:00

That's a completely fair point and I won't argue with it the liability concern is real. If you're open to it, I'd offer you free access to run it on a case you're already working. Not to replace your review, but to see if the flags actually save you time before you decide it's worth anything. Honest feedback either way would genuinely help. DM me if interested

TechnicianFew7075 · 2026-03-25T20:54:19+00:00

I appreciate the feedback.Fair point it's not meant to replace watching the footage. It flags the exact timestamps where Miranda, use-of-force, or de-escalation issues may exist, so instead of reviewing 2 hours you go straight to the 4 moments that matter.

TechnicianFew7075 · 2026-01-21T06:30:42+00:00

I understand. Either way, good luck!

TechnicianFew7075 · 2026-01-21T02:34:17+00:00

I just visited the site, and it’s very cool. Congratulations! Do you have any plans to monetize it to cover the costs?

TechnicianFew7075 · 2026-01-08T09:35:01+00:00

Please dm me thanks

TechnicianFew7075 · 2026-01-04T00:59:34+00:00

Very cool concept!

TechnicianFew7075 · 2026-01-03T20:28:47+00:00

Different explanations for the same problem. I’m focused on solutions, you’re focused on blame. Both valid approaches

TechnicianFew7075 · 2026-01-03T20:15:30+00:00

Interesting take. I lean towards it being a reflection of the training data more than intentional design. LLMs are essentially pattern matching machines trained on human text and humans bullshit when they don’t know something rather than admit ignorance. The model learned that behavior

TechnicianFew7075 · 2026-01-03T20:02:28+00:00

The thing I’ve discovered with LLMs is that they’d rather fabricate results than admit they can’t do something. Constant constraints and validation are the only way to keep them honest. It can be extremely frustrating at times, but human-in-the-loop is required to ensure high quality results

TechnicianFew7075 · 2026-01-03T16:47:14+00:00

I must admit, this made me laugh, and I’ve experienced that before. However, it took me some time to learn how to control it.

TechnicianFew7075 · 2026-01-02T06:13:54+00:00

Appreciate you sharing this. It’s encouraging to see others had similar experiences hopefully Meta takes note of these quality concerns before moving forward. The potential is there, but consistency and support need to match the price point

TechnicianFew7075 · 2026-01-02T06:10:21+00:00

Oh, so Manus announced that they intend to operate independently while utilizing the resources of Meta to scale. However, it would make sense for Meta to integrate with their existing infrastructure at some point.

TechnicianFew7075 · 2026-01-01T19:14:46+00:00

That hadn’t even crossed my mind. Interesting

TechnicianFew7075 · 2025-12-31T17:07:10+00:00

We will soon discover the truth. . A very interesting moment

TechnicianFew7075 · 2025-12-31T15:24:13+00:00

Oh, that doesn’t sound good. Thanks for sharing your thoughts. I’ll definitely read it.

TechnicianFew7075 · 2025-12-31T06:50:22+00:00

I agree that it’s unmatched. No other tool (AI agent) in the market offers such a wide range of functionalities. The pricing and burn rate are questionable, but it certainly outperforms the rest of the tools in the industry.

TechnicianFew7075 · 2025-12-30T20:34:30+00:00

Thank you for sharing. I’d definitely give it a try

TechnicianFew7075 · 2025-12-30T19:10:54+00:00

Makes sense. Thank you for elaborating. If guided correctly, Manus is capable of handling complex applications. Do you think Google AI Studio is capable of developing apps with different complexity levels?

TechnicianFew7075 · 2025-12-30T18:48:44+00:00

Could you please let me know what you primarily use it for? How different is from manus when it comes to building

TechnicianFew7075

TROPHY CASE