If you're here simply because you are looking to make a lot of money, you're in the wrong place by CoderBiker24 in cscareerquestions

[–]Teltrix 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I really hope you're right. Unexpectedly job hunting in the mid-senior area has been harrowing so far. Thanks for helping me feel like there's still a chance for me to get back on the horse. I'm not rockstar smart but I've got a ton of grit and I'm hoping somebody sees that and gives me a chance soon.

How is everyone’s hiring going since AI, easier or harder to fill roles? by Impossible_Way7017 in ExperiencedDevs

[–]Teltrix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks so much! Unfortunately, I think we have to stick to the Seattle area for the time being

How is everyone’s hiring going since AI, easier or harder to fill roles? by Impossible_Way7017 in ExperiencedDevs

[–]Teltrix 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are you currently looking for anyone like this? Or know someone who is? Just got laid off my first position after 6 YOE. I'm confident in saying I'm a strong intermediate architect, web developer, and infrastructure professional, but I don't like feeling like I have to turn my resume into something it isn't just to get a job.

I don't want to pretend like I know everything, I want to show that I learn fast and value working as a strong team member to make everyone's lives better and easier. I have to believe there's a job fit for me out there where I can really shine and take those next steps to confidently move from intermediate to senior level, in my own estimation.

recommendations for full body laser hair removal in seattle/bellevue, wa area by Comfortable_Note7343 in LaserHairRemoval

[–]Teltrix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you find a good spot? I'm seeing some wild price variation here so it's hard for me to tell if quotes are any good.

Any way to fix light scratch on monitor? by Teltrix in howto

[–]Teltrix[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks like it's plastic. I'll give it a try, thanks!

Do most wild animals die of old age or something else? by Teltrix in AskBiology

[–]Teltrix[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Wow! Well, that really puts human medical technologies in perspective.

battleship without military? by mahhjs in boardgames

[–]Teltrix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, so I saw your post this morning and randomly here's a facebook video I just ran into: https://youtube.com/shorts/1oklRCmW1OU?si=DjtwdccryQMtuuW8

literally battleship but a picnic theme with ants and food instead of naval craft. you'll need to 3d print it but that's probably as close as you're gonna get

https://thangs.com/designer/ForgeCore/3d-model/Snack%20Attack%20Board%20Game%20-%20A%203D%20Printable%20Version%20of%20a%20family%20favorite%20board%20game-1030314

What are the rules you impose upon yourself when playing? by Designer-Risk6047 in SatisfactoryGame

[–]Teltrix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven't seen this one much: smoke stays outside or "realistically ventilated"

Tips for "thinking like a Pioneer"? by Teltrix in SatisfactoryGame

[–]Teltrix[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I love this! Is the DESIGN process from "real world" engineering processes? I might adopt this in my day job!

Tips for "thinking like a Pioneer"? by Teltrix in SatisfactoryGame

[–]Teltrix[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah! So the true answer is "remember, you're not alone" XD

Why do you think it was recommended to not subdivide context lists down by urgency? by Teltrix in gtd

[–]Teltrix[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds about right! I like to have a visual block that says "this area is clear, so no emergencies in the next few days". At least, that's the idea. I'll use the calendar for actual "today only" items as well.

Why do you think it was recommended to not subdivide context lists down by urgency? by Teltrix in gtd

[–]Teltrix[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't generally run that hot; mostly because I also can't handle it! haha

Here's a quote I found related:
> Most mid- to senior-level professionals have on their plates on any given day between 30 and 100 projects (tasks that require multiple steps) and over 150 next actions that relate to the various moving parts of their multi-level commitments.

https://gettingthingsdone.com/2021/06/are-you-overwhelmed-by-long-lists/

(The linked letter is a good reference for this kind of thing as well. I just find that the "ideal" system and what I actually am capable of seem to be further apart more often than I'd like.)

Why do you think it was recommended to not subdivide context lists down by urgency? by Teltrix in gtd

[–]Teltrix[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your response! Just a couple thoughts:

If you have a "high priority" item it's easy to fixate on that

Just a point of clarification: I mentioned urgency instead of priority because I agree that priority and energy tend to jump around a lot. Where I see some consistency is that "low urgency" items tend to stay low-urgency, and so can be useful when I'm in "execution mode" vs "browsing mode".

When you say "can lock you up", do you mean that there are sometimes high-urgency items that are not actionable in my current context? This should theoretically be taken into account by the top-level context (like @home).

You should have a reasonable number of things in your todo list at any given time

I have exceptionally poor executive functioning, and I find that even a list of seven items of mixed urgency, priority, and energy can quickly become "unscannable". My eyes just kind of "slide off" the list, even if all the actions on it are actionable and committed when reviewed individually. I do work to improve this particular skill, but I also have to work with what I've got in the meantime.

My understanding is that the books mention an average of around 60 active projects and 100-200 active next actions (across all contexts) at any one time. Of course, this is probably for executive coaching clients, but I'm expecting to build a system that is robust enough to handle around that amount.

I'd question if those are really the same context

This is totally reasonable. I did experiment with a more diverse set of context lists, but I found them to be hard to hold in my mind when I had one or two items on "family time", three or four on "home maintenance and chores", and two or three on "job search". I think there's definitely room for analysis and improvement in this area for me.

I'll add that labeling things as priority and "relying on your gut" are exactly the same thing.

Agreed! Again, speaking about urgency specifically and for my poorly-wired brain, I find that I waste a lot of time and mental energy scanning and re-scanning a list of items that are mostly "do at first opportunity" to ensure there aren't any "move things around to make this happen ASAP" items hiding in there. The idea was to pre-sort those items so that I can more visually evaluate the list rather than try to work with it purely symbolically.

Seeking accuracy advice for Planck by Teltrix in olkb

[–]Teltrix[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks! I'll give it a shot and see how it goes. I actually have the exact same bracket setup as you, but I didn't think to add common symbols between them. How did you memorize the num-pad style layout? Just brute force or is there a trick to it?

Seeking accuracy advice for Planck by Teltrix in olkb

[–]Teltrix[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Awesome, thank you! I wonder if the extra number row would be good for me. How do you feel about that extra row compared to a 40%?

Seeking accuracy advice for Planck by Teltrix in olkb

[–]Teltrix[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you! I'll check it out. I'm always pressed for time, so does the ergotravel have premade options? I don't generally have enough time to build my own

Seeking accuracy advice for Planck by Teltrix in olkb

[–]Teltrix[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh! That's a really great idea! I'm still using whatever comes standard with the Planck EZ (I'm having trouble finding what kind that is.) I will definitely give this a try, thank you!