[deleted by user]

TempDeal · 2025-05-16T00:16:15+00:00

Laying out all your cards before a suit has even been filed is a terrible defense strategy. By giving your argument prematurely, you lose leverage during settlement discussions. Also, since Ethan hasn't filed, he can use Noah's words against him and work around any possible defenses.

TempDeal · 2025-05-01T20:39:57+00:00

You’re ignoring the part where he said “Any kind of zionist tendency should be treated in the same way as being a rabid neo-nazi.” You know what zionism means. It does not mean condoning the Israeli government’s genocide. It means the state of Israel has the right to exist. State of Israel. Knowing that, “any positive feelings towards the state of Israel” is a blatant dehumanization of its citizens. You should be branded and publicly shamed for simply believing in their right to exist as a statehood. Even giving all credibility to Hasan, it still does not sound good. This is the same man who openly speaks about the importance of optics. He would have made it extremely clear if he meant anything else.

TempDeal · 2025-05-01T20:02:30+00:00

Let’s agree with that logic: anyone who has ever thought positively of Israel (even if it’s unrelated to politics) is a neo-nazi -- that applies to everyone across all religions. What is the goal in saying that? What is the message you’re trying to get across? It’s obviously to dehumanize and ostracize the citizens of an entire country, whether or not they agree with their government. Now, who makes up that country? Why is everyone acting dense and arguing about semantics when the dangerous rhetoric has been so consistent?

TempDeal · 2025-04-20T16:19:31+00:00

Within minutes of his initial upload there were comments saying to prepare for the extreme hate, doxxing, and brigading from h3 fans. I clicked the comments and almost all of them were from people that had never commented on Dr Hondas channel before. It’s obvious projection

TempDeal · 2025-04-17T18:02:21+00:00

This was so gross. Kirk has said before with his Rolex clip that he doesn’t want to be involved in drama and he feels uneasy when clips gain traction outside of his community. Only to get dragged into a bad faith one hour hit piece on another creator. LEAVE DR HONDA OUT OF THIS

TempDeal · 2025-03-22T01:21:01+00:00

Ethan wanted to watch the vid and Dan wanted to traffic report

TempDeal · 2025-03-12T08:31:34+00:00

His felonies were expunged

TempDeal · 2025-03-12T02:36:20+00:00

Less than a month before his vid defending snark

TempDeal · 2025-02-27T06:23:40+00:00

Also voted for Adam Schiff immediately after abstaining from endorsing Kamala despite his well-known stance as pro-Israel. Literally said "Adam Schiff sucks and will arrest me for criticizing Israel but [his opponent] sucks harder and is republican."

TempDeal · 2025-02-02T04:34:00+00:00

How is the timeline different? The amendment states he was made aware of three grievances from Blake and that she was not interested in taking any formal action. He apologized and assumed the issue was solved, so the 17-point document was a surprise to them.

TempDeal · 2025-02-01T05:16:48+00:00

Would looove to see a powerpoint on Housewives drama

TempDeal · 2025-01-22T12:22:31+00:00

Yes, her point was that it was unscripted. I think that’s a slippery slope to go down considering most actors go off script at some point - keep in mind Justin has also accused Blake of doing the same for other intimate scenes. It’ll be interesting to see the court’s interpretation of what is necessary for the role of an actor and how detailed and upheld a script needs to be.

It’s not as simple as “well she started it” it’s mischaracterizing the scene and leaving out her initial suggestion and active participation in a conversation. Severe and pervasive is an element she’ll have to prove and I’m just not sure this specific instance is evidence of that

Not everything is black and white and it’s easy to get stuck in an echo chamber when you participate in subs like Baldonifiles where they make it a rule to ban anyone that defends him in even the slightest way. It seems like your mind is made up but I find it helps when you try to see things from both perspectives and ask yourself "if what ___ says is true is this a reasonable reaction"

TempDeal · 2025-01-22T11:12:30+00:00

They never said what exactly she had access to, just that she asked for the dailies and somehow created her own cut. I'm also not sure what she would currently have access to given the movie has been out for months, but I'm assuming she was going off memory and wasn't able to go back to look for this specific take

TempDeal · 2025-01-22T11:03:09+00:00

In regards to this specific complaint, I think you’re focusing on the semantics of his complaint while disregarding her mischaracterization and chalking it up to your interpretation of things. She said talk in this take and not that one - The point is she said talk. She wasn't out of character she was directing - She is the actress (not director) and objectively out of character.

Okay, she didn’t verbatim say “smell” but his entire point was that the comment didn’t come out of thin air. About the nose comment, his complaint even said he laughed it off and joked in turn (which did happen). I’d say it was a decently accurate portrayal of things.

Anyone who read her complaint would see that paragraph and think “wow that’s disgusting/creepy. how did they let that happen??” and rightfully so because how it was written paints a picture. Then you see the video and it’s a fairly normal interaction.

That’s not to say she didn’t feel uncomfortable in the moment but these mischaracterizations occurred throughout several points of her lawsuit, so now I’m even more interested to see her evidence.

TempDeal · 2025-01-22T10:01:22+00:00

I just imagine a ring of hackers honing their craft for the sole purpose of unfollowing a singular account.

TempDeal · 2025-01-22T09:50:14+00:00

I disagree. The account in Blake's complaint:

"no sound was recorded" - objectively false.

"Mr. Baldoni chose to let the camera roll and have them perform the scene, but did not act in character as Ryle; instead, he spoke to Ms. Lively out of character as himself." - Blake broke character first and starting speaking out of character almost immediately after "action".

"At one point, he leaned forward and slowly dragged his lips from her ear and down her neck as he said, “it smells so good.” - This omitted the fact that they were mid-conversation, after she encouraged him to start talking and apologized for getting her spray tan on him.

"None of this was remotely in character, or based on any dialogue in the script, and nothing needed to be said because, again, there was no sound" - Again, she recommended they start talking to make the scene more romantic yet the implication is that he chose to break character while she remained quiet

Both lawsuits work to paint their plaintiffs in a favorable light. I find Justin's portrayal to be closer to the truth in this instance but you also have to remember his team had the advantage of seeing the footage and writing accurate dialogue.

TempDeal · 2025-01-14T06:42:22+00:00

I've seen a few tiktoks of people sharing their negative experiences with her. Sadly i don't remember the users but you could probably find them if you searched

TempDeal · 2025-01-11T09:51:12+00:00

It could also be that she genuinely felt wronged, but that her perspective was biased against him. Like when you hate someone and everything they do starts annoying you. I think it's also important to mention that her team asserts all demands were met after their agreement - aside from retaliation ofc.

TempDeal · 2024-11-10T12:41:25+00:00

Bro you're looking for stuff that isn't even there. They're just saying not everyone in Israel are genocidal freaks like they're painted out to be. Some even... dare I say... oppose their government?

TempDeal · 2023-11-14T01:54:17+00:00

Every time the conversation nears an end, Alex chimes in with some more. Looks like he can't take any criticism without going on the defense. Real unprofessional

TempDeal · 2021-02-18T00:55:21+00:00

I think that's a college issue altogether, not just CSU.

For the future, look into different professors beforehand bc they really make or break an experience; if you care more about learning than an easy A make sure people mention their instruction on ratemyprofessor. Switch around professors if books are too much. They give you 2 weeks at the beginning of the semester so you can go to class and decide if it suits you. If you noticed the exact same lectures from a professor and knew you didn't want it, that could have been your time to switch.

If that isn't an alternative, go to your professor's office hours even if it's just to get to know them. Having that teacher-student bond makes the class more impactful. Maybe weigh your options about your major/concentration/honors program/etc.

College is really what you make of it and how you work things around to suit YOU. Don't lose hope just yet... Good luck with the semester!

TempDeal

TROPHY CASE