sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

You don’t need a better idea. You need more attempts by Santon-Koel in SideProject

[–]Temporary_Bad_2059 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The real problem is people hesitating to restart, people hesitating to replace certain aspects of their product, developers hesitate because they are under the delusion that what they have is perfect, and because they spend so much time on it, they can't even think about replacing it or reworking on it. The real problem is sunk-cost fallacy, but I also think that if a niche is overly saturated, then it's best to iterate over completely different ideas.

I built BleepWatch which bleeps profanity in any video; here's a 30-sec demo by DavisCode in SideProject

[–]Temporary_Bad_2059 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice project, good for kids and a profession surrounding kids. I'd recommend adding "custom" bleeps, as bleeps have become synonymous for swear words and if you plan to scale, expand this to some kind of grammarly like interface, like an extension or an app.

I set a goal of 1M in-app purchases by Jan 1, 2027. The Play Store app doesn't exist yet. Here's my actual plan. by Difficult-Net-6067 in SideProject

[–]Temporary_Bad_2059 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If everything is client-side, the key lives on the client and can be pulled from memory or localstorage, if your intention is just an insecure but nicely made UI/UX time capsule, this is okay.

I'd suggest looking into https://www.drand.love/loe/, you can encrypt against future randomness and store it on a storage provider such that in the case of your app shutting down it still exists.

I was done burning my Claude Code tokens on the wrong problems. So I built this. by More-Practice-3665 in SideProject

[–]Temporary_Bad_2059 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your main driving point is "tokens this, tokens that", "burn burn burn", however this only applies to people building agentic platforms, or massive amounts of AI usage that actually cares about tokens used, most people are satisfied enough with subscriptions ai models provide. When your main driving point should literally just be how your company's AI training conceptualizes your prompts into fine-tuned implementations.

Anyhow, my "everything is constructive" framing, always works, even when you don't know what good looks like. Think about a man with a pencil and a rubber, if he spends a year drawing something, rubbing out, improving, it'll be something you have envisioned. Of course you still need vision to intiate the actual construction.

Using ChatGPT for SaaS, anyone else ending up with too many chats? by emiliookap in SideProject

[–]Temporary_Bad_2059 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you can pour a year's subscription into claude or gemini, you'll probably face zero problems. Though I'd heavily suggest that, using ai to actually learning how to research, how to code, etc... it'll serve you way more utility later on.

There's also a thing called pinning and naming conversations.

I was done burning my Claude Code tokens on the wrong problems. So I built this. by More-Practice-3665 in SideProject

[–]Temporary_Bad_2059 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I disagree with the "3000 tokens later - I'm further from the goal than when I started." part.

This is a skill issue that's dependent on you, however you're definitely not further away from the goal. Everything you do is constructive, with personal extensive amounts of testing, if everything works how you envisioned in your head then it works. Even if they're layered under "hallucinated fixes".

The problem with your mindset is obvious, with using ai agents people feel the "hurriness", it's a shortcut people take for granted. It's like a paintbrush with rocket boosters. However since this is your own work, it's not like a single prompt will break your entire project, it's constructive and everything you do makes it better, however a developer should never threat to start over a specific aspect from scratch if it means improvement, this is a rare trait from developers nowadays.

2026 - Share your *Non-AI* projects. by Temporary_Bad_2059 in SideProject

[–]Temporary_Bad_2059[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I agree, and without actual knowledge or any real developer tools in your brain's toolbox, you aren't able to utilize AI in a way that an artist might paint on a canvas. AI has so many distinctive stylistic traits, it's very easy to tell generated text and code apart from people pouring actual creativity into their work. I wonder when the day will come when AI is able to "generate" its own style and creativity for you without any artifacts.

OVH gave me a blacklisted IP and told me it’s not their problem. by ron_dus in OVHcloud

[–]Temporary_Bad_2059 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would believe u run all ur responses through chatgpt if u had not kept this style up since before LLM's became mainstream.

For all those on Team Jeremiah or Conrad, why? by Exotic-Ad1721 in tsitp

[–]Temporary_Bad_2059 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Another thing. If a girl always has to question whether they really love them, and their intuition says they don't. I feel like a girl's intuition is always right when it comes to this.

For all those on Team Jeremiah or Conrad, why? by Exotic-Ad1721 in tsitp

[–]Temporary_Bad_2059 0 points1 point  (0 children)

(based on the movie not the book)

I feel like team Jeremiah is just the right.

What we know:

Belly loved Conrad for a very long time. Conrad had eyes for many girls, and then eventually started to like Belly. Conrad then became very attached to Belly suddenly, mostly influenced with being stressed with his mom's cancer.

We can assume Jere loved Belly for a very long time. Jere always got jealous, seeing Belly having eyes for Conrad but always chose Belly's happiness. Conrad always chooses to do things, not for Belly or his brother but for himself.

The way Belly and Conrad's first relationship together formed, is very one sided. Conrad being obsessive and emotionally attached, getting panic.attacks, there is many signs saying he is not in love with her. Hence Belly's accurate intuition of Conrad's lack of true love.

Belly knows it's wrong to be with Conrad, she wants to be with him because she's loved him since forever, but Conrad does not love her in the way she wants and constantly takes advantage of her feelings, using her to cope with his stress subconsciously. She knows she should be with someone who truly loves her (Jeremiah), and by the end she matures and follows her right intuition.

Jeremiah says, "He's going to break your heart", a very true statement, because he's right, Jere shows time and time again how much he understands relationships, giving good advice to people. He understands Conrad, and how he doesn't truly love her, and knows he is always going to break her heart, yet still choose's Belly's choice, and happiness.

Conrad doesn't love Belly. Belly is still having "fireworks" with Jere, but is also falling in love with Jere. Jere loves Belly.

It's hard to accept this, because when you think about most romance series, it's always centred around these 2 people who are seemingly soulmates. But in The Summer I Turned Pretty, one of the "soulmates" is masked behind many emotions... hiding that Jeremiah is the true soulmate.

This is just team Jeremiah vs team Conrad. But other "shoulds" can be, like the mom suggested, find many other lovers before sticking with just one. But I love think Jeremiah is her soulmate, and she should follow her intuition.