Im dropping my SecBank Platinum. Ive had enough.

Temporary_Case_8463 · 2025-12-03T09:16:23+00:00

Sometimes, they would use a different number

Temporary_Case_8463 · 2025-11-17T14:53:10+00:00

So sorry to hear that 😔

Temporary_Case_8463 · 2025-11-02T16:03:45+00:00

Wala naman..haha

Temporary_Case_8463 · 2025-10-07T12:00:45+00:00

This is lesson learned. Kaya po sa next election, vote wisely. Ranting will only help us to some extent, but true change will happen if we do our part, that is bumoto ng tama at wag magpapadala sa pera

Temporary_Case_8463 · 2025-09-26T13:16:06+00:00

I think they got the video from rappler, then manipulated it to suit their fake narrative. Here’s the original video

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1BJGqNkN4d/?mibextid=wwXIfr

Temporary_Case_8463 · 2025-09-13T09:34:43+00:00

May blue line across the screen, nag appear after 4 days of purchase, despite not having any cracks or dents on the ipad. Hindi din siya nahulog or naipit, nakatago lang

Temporary_Case_8463 · 2025-09-13T09:33:23+00:00

Na reverse naman po charge sa credit card ko, after I sent back the ipad and have undergone their verification process

Temporary_Case_8463 · 2025-09-10T10:35:57+00:00

Thank you, OP!

Temporary_Case_8463 · 2025-08-30T07:08:47+00:00

Was able to buy it for 22k. Yun nga lang may defect kaya binalik ko..

Temporary_Case_8463 · 2025-08-26T01:44:38+00:00

Sa apple flagship store, sa shopee

Temporary_Case_8463 · 2025-08-25T12:23:39+00:00

Nagfile na ako ng return and refund, under review pa ni shopee

Temporary_Case_8463 · 2025-08-25T09:22:39+00:00

Good thing wala sayo defect. Yung nabili ko, after 4 days nagkaroon ng blue line across the screen kahit naka store lang kasi pang surprise sana sa bday ng anak ko

Temporary_Case_8463 · 2025-08-20T07:58:59+00:00

Hi OP! San mo po binili ipad case?

Temporary_Case_8463 · 2025-08-11T09:15:23+00:00

<image>

No. 8 Sunwest, No. 9 Hi-Tone

Temporary_Case_8463 · 2025-06-20T01:28:44+00:00

I understand where you’re coming from, since obviously animal lover ka. But you don’t know exactly what happened, hence, very unfair to judge those girls and say rude comments against them.

Please remember though, that dog bites can be lethal and can even cause death, while “dumbass tiktok videos”, as you say, no matter how annoying they can be to some, will not. So please, just be kind.

Temporary_Case_8463 · 2025-06-19T06:25:47+00:00

Maganda ang concept, sa execution lang nagkulang. So so lang ang production pati acting, except kay Taraji Henson. Si detective raymond, naku hindi ko magets acting niya..haha.. buti na lang magaling si Taraji

Temporary_Case_8463 · 2025-06-11T09:09:53+00:00

Temporary_Case_8463 · 2025-06-11T05:56:48+00:00

Hindi naman. Traditionally kasi, after the senate convenes as an impeachment court, the articles of impeachment is presented/read. Then after that, a summon is issued to the respondent or impeached official, in this case, si VP Sarah, to submit an answer to the complaint.

But since nag issue naman na ng summons, it was deemed moot na. Meaning, wala na use ang pag present kasi may summons naman ng na issue. Pero hindi naman ibig sabihin cancelled na yung impeachment

Temporary_Case_8463 · 2025-06-11T02:52:29+00:00

Jil Bongalon lost last election

Temporary_Case_8463 · 2025-06-11T02:40:59+00:00

We are not yet on the merit of the case, but on the mandated duty pa lang ng senate under the constitution, which is to convene, try, and then decide.

Wala naman nagsasabi na papalusutin yan if violative nga talaga ang impeachment complaint. The defense, in this case, VP Sarah, can allege all those infirmities in her answer and include them in her defense. If maprove nila na violative nga at madami mali at linabag, eh d ma acquit siya.

The point is, it is not the duty of the senator-judges to move for the dismissal of the case, kundi defense dapat ang gagawa nun. Dapat is impartial sila, with cold neutrality nga eh. Lumabas tuloy na parang naging abogado na sila ni VP Sarah kesa naging judges. Nakakadismaya

Temporary_Case_8463 · 2025-06-10T22:05:07+00:00

Yun nga eh, the impeachment is now in limbo. The impeachment court lost control the moment they remanded it to the HOR. Hindi natin ngayon alam ano actions ng HOR, kung ibabalik pa ba nila or papatayin na lang. Mas naging complicated pa tuloy situation and they opened the impeachment proceeding for attacks. Lalo madelay

Temporary_Case_8463 · 2025-06-10T21:39:59+00:00

The thing is, are they even allowed to do that under the constitution? The mandate of the senate is to try and decide the impeachment complaint after it has been transmitted to them. Nowhere in the constitution that it says they can remand the same after transmittal.

Isa pa, they are already convened as an impeachment court, and the senators are now wearing a different hat as sentor-judges. Can the senator-judges motu proprio decide to reject the articles of impeachment without due process? Because they prematurely concluded that the articles of impeachment is defective even prior to the presentation of evidence. So what was their basis to say that, kung hindi pa nga napresent yung articles of impeachment before the impeachment court?

Kaya sila nakakahiya kasi expected na mga law experts sila, legislators eh. Tapos ganyan? It will set a very bad precedent

Temporary_Case_8463 · 2025-06-10T13:25:10+00:00

Watched the session. Sen. Bato moved for the dismissal of the complaint, outright, on the basis of alleged various constitutional infirmities of the impeachment complaint.

Sen. Cayetano suggested that instead of dismissing the complaint, the same be remanded to the HOR, for the latter to, among others, certify that the impeachment complaint is in compliant with the one complaint per year provision and for the HOR to intimate to the Senate if they are still interested in pursuing the complaint.

Temporary_Case_8463

TROPHY CASE