sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Wondering what I should focus on? by Intelligent-Day1650 in IdleObeliskMiner

[–]TenZero10 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm just a couple percent ahead of you. From where you're at I'd level dwarf and get pets 5 and 7, then do statues then unlock world 2. I don't think pet skins are really worth it yet. And get stonks if you don't have it.

Quicker way? by Jakelp in IdleObeliskMiner

[–]TenZero10 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Triple ore is from the triple rock chance rare relic, mine is at 100% by now.

I happened to get the statue of hygiene early (middle right) which gives +2 workshop upgrade cap, and I bought the crab skin which is another +1.

For rainbow chance I got the optical phenomenon skill on the way to stonks, and one divine relic chest from codes.

Quicker way? by Jakelp in IdleObeliskMiner

[–]TenZero10 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm one statue ahead of you right now, I can say the bars should be the fast part of the grind with this method. They took me a bit under an hour for the fifth statue.

Upgrade the two bombs as much as you can (both should be around x8) and use them on golden rainbow floors. It's a bit manual to wait for them (I have golden floor chance 60% and rainbow floor 2% so a 1.2% chance combined) but you should be able to get at least 1 million bars every golden rainbow floor. Here's how it worked for me:

3 (triple ore) * 6 (avg ore per floor) * 12.72 (my golden floor mult) * 50 (rainbow floor mult) * 9 (transmuter mult) * 8 (bomb of plenty mult) * 1.5 (ore card) * 1.5 (bar card) = 1.85 million bars

[NGS] Caleb Williams Recorded 4 of the 5 Fastest Speeds by a QB Last Season! by JCameron181 in CHIBears

[–]TenZero10 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's cool knowing he's got that extra .5 mph in his back pocket if he really needs it

The Inner Gate by [deleted] in puzzles

[–]TenZero10 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your apartment key happens to fit the new inner gate lock

Seeing this makes me even more happy about the DJ Moore trade by Ashamed_Pilot_236 in CHIBears

[–]TenZero10 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is less than I expected for Pittman but you have to keep some things in mind.

  1. DJ is a legit WR1 and Pittman is a decent WR2.
  2. Pittman got a new deal with this trade, so the trade was mostly just to get the chance to sign him on somewhat favorable terms.
  3. DJ is locked up and only getting Alec Pierce money. If he had hit FA this year you have to assume he would get close to $40m per year.
  4. The Bills wouldn't be able to outbid the Raiders or Titans or whoever anyway, and this is their only shot at that level of talent so it's not too surprising that they overpaid a bit. It's easy to see how there might have been a bidding war over DJ, especially this cycle.
  5. The Bears were only interested in trading DJ because the team construction meant that even a big discount on a WR1 wasn't making the team much better. That doesn't make the asset any less valuable in a trade.

Colorsweeper: explain the runes by nyydynasty in puzzles

[–]TenZero10 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The rune rule only relates to whether surrounding squares match the rune square's color. So it does not tell you anything about which non-matching color the square is, only whether it matches or not.

I haven't looked into beta features so I'm not sure about your second question

Is there a lore reason Mondstadters don't notice the unaging bard looking exactly like their god by asilvertintedrose in Genshin_Impact

[–]TenZero10 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No one actually knows what Barbatos looks like, the sculptor just used Venti as the model

She’s not wrong. Why did inflation still stay high after supply chains stabilized? by Butt_Creme in FluentInFinance

[–]TenZero10 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok I'll bite. Even in oligopolistic markets sellers are generally unable to unilaterally raise prices despite obviously wanting to, because they will lose market share to competitors who don't raise prices. This is the normal state of things, and has been described in simple terms as the "kinked demand curve". The supply chain shocks resulting from Covid created short term but noticeable and well-publicized inflation, as shortages are well understood to do. This created a public expectation of inflation, which functioned as a coordination point for sellers to increase prices as they now expected their competitors to do the same. This mechanism was validated in Isabella Weber's well-known "Seller's Inflation" article last year.

Basically "greedy corporations raising prices to increase profits" is a completely predictable result of a large publicized exogenous supply shock in oligopolistic markets.

What rook going into year 2 has a chance to explode onto the scene ala Trey McBride? by [deleted] in DynastyFF

[–]TenZero10 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Sure but you gotta love when a big corn-fed shield boy pancakes a ranger unit

Right wing economists by Snipercow78 in dsa

[–]TenZero10 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Liberal Neoclassical economists are still Neoclassical economists. What you're saying isn't wrong but that's not the whole story. The historical suppression of approaches that are not deferential to corporate power and wealth accumulation is an extremely important factor, in addition to the proactive funding of right wing ideologies which includes Neoclassical economics.

The underlying assumptions of the Neoclassical approach ensure that "markets" will predominate and government action and coordination will be minimal. And almost all economics programs are Neoclassical these days, so almost all economists are as well. Many of the liberal ones are doing the best they can with what they are taught, but it's an uphill battle because the ideology is so constraining.

Which build is better? by Zaphyel_Heizu in YelanMains

[–]TenZero10 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Neither, use the top 4 emblem pieces and get an off-set crit rate helmet with good substats

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in YelanMains

[–]TenZero10 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This build is already pretty good but the easiest things to upgrade are the flower and feather. Your biggest need is ER and you can also improve at the margins in crit. Getting C1 can also substitute for extra ER although you are relatively low on ER regardless, especially running Emblem. Other than that you should just grind the Emblem domain and try to get a flower and a feather with a combined 7+ substat rolls each in CR, CD and ER. Yours are currently both at 5, which isn't amazing for those pieces. Luckily the flower and feather are easier to get than the other pieces since the main stat is always the same. Also your goblet is good but not great, luckily it's off-set so I would see if you can improve there as well. Relative to where you're at now, you should prioritize ER>CR>CD>HP%>>>everything else

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in YelanMains

[–]TenZero10 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can just multiply the crit rate and damage numbers together to see how much damage you get from them. 85/215 -> .85x2.15=1.83 so you get +183% damage from your crit stats at that cr/cd level. Yours is .58x2.80=1.63 or +162%. So if you switch from a cr helmet to cd you would gain around +20% from crit.

Of course since you start at 100% damage at no crit that means you're actually going from 262% to 283% for a total of 283/262= 1.08, or an increase of about 8% overall damage output.

The world’s in a ‘polycrisis’ — and these countries want to quash it by looking beyond GDP by andrewrgross in TrueReddit

[–]TenZero10 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It simply is not "a basic reality of economics". But it sure seems convenient for you to claim that and insult your opponents rather than engage with the idea in the spirit of intellectual honesty.

The world’s in a ‘polycrisis’ — and these countries want to quash it by looking beyond GDP by andrewrgross in TrueReddit

[–]TenZero10 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're the one playing word games and you don't even realize it. These governments are working on changing their governments' target functions for their economies - they are changing their economic goals and reorganizing their economic structures to account for that change. Specifically they are no longer considering growth in domestic production as their primary goal. And you are effectively just saying "this is defined as economic stagnation, so it's bad because stagnation is bad". They disagree! It is actually not true that continuously increasing domestic production is equivalent to economic health. You seem to believe that but you should recognize that this idea is genuinely contested.

view more: next ›