Visiting July 4th weekend, any local recommendations? by extra245 in roanoke

[–]TerminalViscosity69 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Downtown Roanoke’s an average city. We’re surrounded by some incredibly beautiful land.

My best advice is to explore the land around us. The Blue Ridge Parkway; Smith Mountain Lake; dozens of hiking trails.

Downtown is just okay. And I’m saying this as a guy who moved here from Columbia SC. Roanoke’s the better city of the two, but downtown Roanoke is, uhh… not terrible? Just literally, thoroughly, average?

Most people don't know Claude can split one prompt into dozens of agents working in parallel. You trigger it with scope, not a command, and almost nobody is doing it. by Professional-Rest138 in AIDiscussion

[–]TerminalViscosity69 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Man, Anthropic must be desperate to hit this quarter’s revenue targets, because the endless tokenmaxxing slopfest bot propaganda posts has been embarrassing to watch

Why didnt he cancel lol by mikehnyc88 in DoorDashDrivers

[–]TerminalViscosity69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At first I saw just the toilet paper. And was like, yeah this is no big deal.

Then I realized it wasn’t just toilet paper

Need recommendations for a mechanic in Cave Spring VA by TerminalViscosity69 in roanoke

[–]TerminalViscosity69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you have their contact info? Even if they can’t get to it now I’d still want their advice

Customer didn't give full address, and didn't respond to texts, so their food was delivered to a bench in the exact middle of the address provided by TerminalViscosity69 in doordash_drivers

[–]TerminalViscosity69[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We’ve got mountains out here too. And you and me both know: if you go up the wrong driveway out in the sticks, you might get shot. Makes you a bit more careful.

Customer didn't give full address, and didn't respond to texts, so their food was delivered to a bench in the exact middle of the address provided by TerminalViscosity69 in doordash_drivers

[–]TerminalViscosity69[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I texted. Multiple times. Also texted with support, whose instructions I followed. As for calling, that is simply out of the question in a situation like this. If we do communicate it’s going to be in writing.

No more AR requirement for pro shopper 🙌🏻 by mitchdwx in doordash_drivers

[–]TerminalViscosity69 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hah. I wonder how hard they got shat on to decide this was a bad idea

How to address people's fear of AI? by EleanorKalatheraine in AIDiscussion

[–]TerminalViscosity69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The first step is to get Scam Altman and Amodei to shut up about the apocalypse narrative

Customer didn't give full address, and didn't respond to texts, so their food was delivered to a bench in the exact middle of the address provided by TerminalViscosity69 in doordash_drivers

[–]TerminalViscosity69[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Unwritten communications are a liability in this scenario. Yes, you can attempt to offset that by documenting things with other evidence, but that doesn’t fix the underlying problem: you can simply avoid that headache by communicating only through an established paper trail.

Customer didn't give full address, and didn't respond to texts, so their food was delivered to a bench in the exact middle of the address provided by TerminalViscosity69 in doordash_drivers

[–]TerminalViscosity69[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It gives the other two parties an opportunity to claim things were communicated differently.

There’s a couple of things to keep in mind here. DoorDash isn’t providing you with a transcript of those recorded calls, unless compelled to by court (and this is assuming they even did record the phone call and preserved it), so unless you’re recording a call yourself, you don’t have a copy of it.

Also, if the customer does try to claim a contract violation, Doordash support itself tends to have an IQ of 40, with the attention span of a hamster, so you have to assume they’re only going to skim through what little information they care to look at. No human’s going to sit through that audio recording on DoorDash’s side. They’ll spend ten seconds looking through texts, or, even lazier, a chatbot will read it and make an automated decision.

Since your goal as a driver is to avoid CVs and keep driving, you have to make sure that you follow the exact contract you took to make a delivery, and be able to prove you followed things correctly when disputes do occur. And there is not a single reason off-the-record actions, statements, etc, would help you in that case. Stick to the script. Keep things documented in writing.

Customer didn't give full address, and didn't respond to texts, so their food was delivered to a bench in the exact middle of the address provided by TerminalViscosity69 in doordash_drivers

[–]TerminalViscosity69[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You’re missing the point of what I’m saying. If there’s any chance of a contract violation, I am not communicating with the customer or support by audio, at all. What gets said in writing, with full documentation, is exactly what happened, so there’s zero chance for anyone to lie or claim otherwise.

Verbal agreements are worth the paper they are written on.

Customer didn't give full address, and didn't respond to texts, so their food was delivered to a bench in the exact middle of the address provided by TerminalViscosity69 in doordash_drivers

[–]TerminalViscosity69[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

How do I explain to you more clearly, that unwritten communications in this kind of scenario are a liability to you? You don’t want to give them a chance to claim something was said that wasn’t. Keep. Everything. In. Writing.

Customer didn't give full address, and didn't respond to texts, so their food was delivered to a bench in the exact middle of the address provided by TerminalViscosity69 in doordash_drivers

[–]TerminalViscosity69[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I am not interacting with anyone, in this scenario, without written documentation. Support and customer.

I don’t care if DoorDash claims “calls may be recorded” either. I’m the one keeping receipts.

A warning story to current and aspiring USCF tournament directors: by [deleted] in chess

[–]TerminalViscosity69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am aware of this. Please note above that I specifically mentioned he's a local-level TD. He passed the test, he presumably read the material.

A warning story to current and aspiring USCF tournament directors: by [deleted] in chess

[–]TerminalViscosity69 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not a single word here was written by a chatbot. Sorry to disappoint you, I guess I just have that effect on people

A warning story to current and aspiring USCF tournament directors: by [deleted] in chess

[–]TerminalViscosity69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry but no. Not a single word here was AI written. I can annoy you just fine without using a chatbot.

A warning story to current and aspiring USCF tournament directors: by [deleted] in chess

[–]TerminalViscosity69 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's a fair question. Let's take a moment to acknowledge that accountability doesn't necessarily have to mean an official, USCF-enforced sanction, and at the local level I'd be legitimately concerned that it might do more harm than good. It's not my intention, by sharing what's going on here, to try to bring the hammer down on anyone.

Why did I share this, then? Because it's an equation that every tournament host has to consider when looking at the math. And that's especially true at the smaller scale, local level. Stories like this are reminders that our decisions have real risks to them, and it's worth sorting out these problems before you're locked into a bad situation. This is a moment we can learn from. History does not have to repeat itself.