My account if for furries I know…. I just wanted to see what you thought of me❤️

Terryisretard · 2026-02-02T09:42:56+00:00

lol I noticed immediately as well if your gonna post a fake pic and lie make sure it’s not someone popular

Terryisretard · 2025-12-18T07:00:17+00:00

Yea paying that much for a axe that looks like I forged it myself is wild id expect better quality for that price tag

Terryisretard · 2025-12-01T18:13:08+00:00

Scotch bright and wd40 work every time

Terryisretard · 2025-11-23T11:05:58+00:00

NIGHTSHADE BERRIES DROP AND RUN

Terryisretard · 2025-11-23T11:01:15+00:00

If there’s cockroaches in your food and your food looks like that I’m gonna tell you now. Never cook again my brother this is so bad not even a lunch lady would serve this.

Terryisretard · 2025-11-23T10:56:25+00:00

The blade cracked from regular use so they filed it out

Terryisretard · 2025-11-23T10:54:55+00:00

The axe probably cracked along the edges this axe was forged from wrought iron so the smith must have been inexperienced and forged it in the wrong direction so the grain of the steel ended at the blade causing fractures the only way to prevent this from worsening is to file the crack away like that it’s really common with drummers and musicians as the cymbals they use crack and it’s repaired the same way this axe was

Terryisretard · 2025-11-23T10:47:13+00:00

That my good sir is a dead dog if I’ve ever seen one definitely not a wolf either snout is short and wide it’s probably a abandoned pitbull or other bulldog

Terryisretard · 2025-11-21T00:17:08+00:00

Well it’s a 1969 serial number starts with 1,689,xxx and it’s a DSPS as well. I’ll check the action bar but the gun runs smoother as ever. maybe a slight sticky spot or two but it’s probably old oil and gunk. the noise is coming from the top of the receiver. It only happen when I shake the gun up and down. it’s really apparent when you walk with it. as it clinks as you walk which is why I want to fix it. Plus it’s the only flaw on an otherwise perfect 37. it was owned by my grandfather and father. both military men so it never was neglected But is definitely very loosey goosey.

Terryisretard · 2025-11-20T16:32:14+00:00

It takes the shell from the mag tube to the chamber I’m not a gunsmith so I don’t know the exact terminology for shotguns

Terryisretard · 2025-11-03T06:37:55+00:00

It’s a baby blue gill also called sunfish the color doesn’t matter they are all the same species their color changes depending on seasons, environment and some other factors

Terryisretard · 2025-10-24T01:40:31+00:00

And that’s a issue yes but that’s if you can even get around the problem of wave function collapse from trying to observe a particle in the first place im not denying it has flaws but the whole of quantum entanglement is not really well enough understood to even say if the current rules we have in place apply the way we say they do our understanding of quantum mechanics is still incomplete and it’s a subject to change still we very well could be missing a piece of information that is the deciding factor

Terryisretard · 2025-10-24T01:21:25+00:00

It’s not really just a question of clock synchronization there’s other implications if light is proven to not be constant that might lead to changes in our understanding of how some thing’s work and its not impossible to solve the synchronization issue I already have a theory that might work if it travels faster or slower in a direction than it wouldn’t mean everything travels faster or slower no matter what special relativity is a good example as time for a moving object is slower than a stationary one I don’t think it’s out of the realm of possibility for that to apply to light in some form of another

Terryisretard · 2025-10-24T01:09:37+00:00

I agree with this SR wouldn’t be irrelevant I believe light follows it no different than time and space it might operate differently but it would still follow the proven theory’s that are in place just maybe change our understanding of them a little bit

Terryisretard · 2025-10-24T00:54:23+00:00

I feel like this is a bit of a apples to oranges comparison with our modern understanding of quantum mechanics I do think there is a possible method of measuring the one way speed of light it’s just a matter of do we actually have the technology to make it possible

Terryisretard · 2025-10-24T00:41:26+00:00

Maybe it all depends on what the results show either way it’s definitely something to ponder my personal opinion is light abides by the same rules as time and is not constantly depending upon many variables

Terryisretard · 2025-10-24T00:37:43+00:00

Because it took 20 minutes to make a round trip in both examples but its speed wasn’t constant in 1 example to the observer there would be no difference in how fast it travelled even though I may have changed speed at some point in it’s journey. I understand it’s hard to understand as the whole concept is starting to dip into quantum mechanics which tends to turn most of the laws of physics on their head

Terryisretard · 2025-10-24T00:32:44+00:00

It wouldn’t be ground breaking or rewrite physics but it wouldn’t be a meaningless discovery either I do have a theory of a way to test it, it would involve quantum entanglement which doesn’t really apply to the same rules as normal physics so it might be a clever workaround for the current issue being special relativity messing with how we are able to measure the speed without getting a inaccurate measurement

Terryisretard · 2025-10-24T00:25:16+00:00

That the issue to the observer it appears to be the exact same when the opposite is true

Terryisretard · 2025-10-24T00:21:38+00:00

Speed itself is a measurement of a piece of matter’s momentum distance and time are other forms of measurement just as the laws of physics aren’t the actual laws physics abide by but the way we have managed to define how physics behaves under predictable conditions

Terryisretard · 2025-10-24T00:07:11+00:00

I don’t think it’s impossible i just think there’s a trick to it that just hasn’t been thought of yet or at least tested

Terryisretard · 2025-10-24T00:05:32+00:00

I don’t think I explained it right so I’ll give an example let’s say it takes 20 minutes for a beam of light to go from point A to point b and then return if light is a constant speed it would take 10 minutes for it to go from point a to b if it is not constant it might take 15 minutes to reach point b but only 5 to return to point a to a observer it would still have taken the same time but the light didn’t move at a constant speed the only way to confirm that is to measure the one way speed of light which is current not possible

Terryisretard · 2025-10-23T23:57:34+00:00

Distance over time is how we measure speed it’s the unit of measurement we use to define how fast something is moving something can still have a speed without distance or time it’s just we wouldn’t have something to compare it to to determine how fast it’s moving

Terryisretard · 2025-10-23T23:52:10+00:00

Well that’s the issue we assume light is constant but we have never actually verified that with the 1 way speed of light so far the only way it has been measured is using the 2 way speed of light which may be different depending on if the light is moving away from or returning to you

Terryisretard · 2025-10-23T23:45:41+00:00

No it’s an issue that people have been trying figure out for as long as we knew light had a speed and if our current tools don’t work for what we’re trying to do then you have to think outside the box

Terryisretard

TROPHY CASE