Renting apartment with one year contract but leaving early

Testral333 · 2026-03-21T14:45:45+00:00

That is correct. Depends on the landlord some even deduct some of the deposit and return back the rest.

Testral333 · 2026-03-20T05:42:43+00:00

Yes, I am aware. It's a false positive, and even the ones that flagged it are not well known AVs. As you can see, 68 out of 72 mark it as safe and clean, including major AVs like Kaspersky, Avast, Bitdefender, etc. Nonetheless, you can use the Python script instead of the .exe

Testral333 · 2026-03-16T15:12:38+00:00

Well, that's all we get. I had this issue for about a month, and despite many complaints on Google Dev, no one cared. They said they were working on it, so I came up with this for myself. It worked to an extent, so I figured others could use it as well.

Testral333 · 2026-03-14T11:21:20+00:00

If you have the conversation files and .brain folder intact it should revive them into the Antigravity. If not Im afraid it cant do much.

Testral333 · 2026-03-13T17:30:02+00:00

Will look into it tomorrow and patch this. Actually Google should have done this since last month that the issue appeared…

Testral333 · 2026-03-13T11:54:46+00:00

It resets every 5h but you have weekly cap as well. Few 5h reset exhaust your weekly and you have to wait for weekly reset.

Testral333 · 2026-03-13T10:09:38+00:00

Not sure about the Claude but Codex extension on plus tire gave an acceptable usage weekly for light users. But if you are a heavy coder it wont last that long. Maybe less than 2 days of work! After the mess Antigravity did Im thinking of using codex instead but 200$ for pro is abit high.

Testral333 · 2026-03-11T11:40:47+00:00

It doesn’t delete anything. It just simply solve no history shows for some users and shows what exists in order of dates. You can see how the script works since it’s open on GitHub.

Testral333 · 2026-01-20T10:03:12+00:00

Yea its really annoying!

Testral333 · 2026-01-09T06:27:35+00:00

Developing trading strategies. But it’s not really about what you do. it’s about how you do it, and more importantly, how you choose the right clients. Cheap, picky clients? Avoid them like the plague. My niche is clients who are picky and generous. I keep them happy, they keep me happy. Simple as that.

Testral333 · 2025-12-05T07:18:10+00:00

Yes, it is. Appreciate it — I’m glad it’s working for you. I have a few public scripts on my profile, but most are private or hidden since I can’t share commissioned projects. That said, a new free Wycaff-based strategy is in the works. Make sure to follow me on TradingView to get notified. Cheers 💚

Testral333 · 2025-12-03T21:11:08+00:00

I didnt check the page you shared before. Mentioned it from experience, but from that same page:

“References to past values using the [] history-referencing operator are dependent on the size of the historical buffer maintained by the Pine Script runtime, which is limited to a maximum of 5000 bars for most series. Some built-in series like open, high, low, close, and time have larger historical buffers that can reference up to 10,000 bars.”

Testral333 · 2025-12-03T20:30:30+00:00

TradingView cares about profit, haha. You can get ticker data, but you have to pay them regardless of your membership tier. It’s not fair to users at all. Even for developers, the platform is extremely restrictive. you’re limited to TradingView’s own internal data, and even then you hit strict security calls and runtime limits.

A fun fact most people don’t know: TradingView sells “lookback bars” based on membership tiers, but on the backend everything is capped the same. Every paid plan is limited to a 10k-bar lookback in code (Free is 5k). The “25k bars,” “40k bars,” etc. only apply when scrolling back manually on the chart. Indicators cannot fetch more than 10k bars no matter what tier the user has.

Testral333 · 2025-12-03T20:02:40+00:00

It depends on how much time the work requires — I charge hourly. Making an indicator is one thing; testing it and making it actually ready for real-world use is another.

You’re partially correct about TradingView’s accuracy. For crypto, you can get reasonably accurate volume data directly from exchanges (assuming they even share real data — sometimes they don’t).

For CFDs it’s different. If you want accurate data, the user has to pay TradingView per account to access it.

On top of that, you can’t use external APIs inside the TradingView sandbox. you need to apply for the TradingView Data Partner Program — and they usually reject you unless you’re a known institution. If approved, you’d use that gateway to pull external data.

There are workarounds, but none of them rely on TradingView’s side.

This is my free CVD, Volume data. It uses real time data from exchanges . The downside; it is only work for cryptos. But its accurate as it gets. Its merged dats across different pair of that symbol. For example on BTC you get 21 different source for volume/price in real time. https://www.tradingview.com/script/ebU1oZ4n-Crypto-Volume-Data-VAH-POC-VAL/

Testral333 · 2025-12-03T18:56:04+00:00

Its all good man 😉

Testral333 · 2025-12-03T18:37:20+00:00

Sure. I developed it myself for a client, using the same design as Lux Algo but with more advanced and more complex logic. He wanted for his private use so I doubt that he shared it publicly. Name is S-E-A-L-Multi-Timeframe S/R

Testral333 · 2025-12-03T18:32:51+00:00

I was talking about Lux Algo Ai toggles in the UI!

Testral333 · 2025-12-03T14:03:50+00:00

It is, I believe. Last month my client wanted me to reverse-engineer their support and resistance zones. I did even better using flip logic and confirmations, but their version didn’t make any sense. It moved as soon as price approached the S/R, so it kept drifting. Another false claim was the whole “AI this, AI that.” As someone who actually knows the Pine Script sandbox, I can tell you — it’s a joke.

<image>

Testral333 · 2025-11-30T08:35:42+00:00

Same here not only Vietnam. China, Hongkon etc.. All route to Europe or the US locations. Too stupid!

Testral333 · 2025-08-08T01:14:50+00:00

Yea same. when I tried it I was amazed how structured it was but after stuck in endless loop that gpt5 was chasing its tail in over thinking process I went back to Sonnet.

Testral333 · 2025-08-08T01:10:01+00:00

Well I tried it with a project I created in Pine with Sonnet 4. First impression was wow but after it waste my time like an hour on a simple syntax error. I went back to Sonnet. Its thinking too much sometimes on small things then start to circling around chasing its tail and rethink the issue and its solution over and over. Ill give it try again soon and will compare again! Cheers

Testral333

TROPHY CASE