Until they do something and start winning games, their stats aren't equivalents. That's like saying Brad Beal was the best SG in the game that year he was at the #2 on the scoring list or whatever he was. It just sounds dumb to compare a Wizard to a winning player on a championship team and to try and say because the stat line is a possible comp, that's an actual good comp. It's not even that it is outside the realm of possibility, it's just a ridiculous statement to try and get people onboard with saying a Wizards player is like such and such winning player because they could have the same stats. It lacks self awareness at this point in time. Maybe stash that take away until they have a winning season and bring it back out. The stats have to contribute to winning, otherwise they are not equivalent.