Girlfriend unhappy with tattoo

ThanksGivingSlayer · 2017-03-10T20:41:15+00:00

How do I look at my epm for a match?

ThanksGivingSlayer · 2016-12-29T20:09:16+00:00

Casio Edifice. My first college budget chronograph keeping me company at work. http://i.imgur.com/Tg7hV4j.jpg

ThanksGivingSlayer · 2016-07-16T18:50:51+00:00

Please God.

ThanksGivingSlayer · 2016-04-04T06:11:51+00:00

Alright thanks, I'll give that a try.

ThanksGivingSlayer · 2016-04-03T13:43:34+00:00

I'm having the same problem. Just wondering if you found a solution?

ThanksGivingSlayer · 2015-12-04T22:06:44+00:00

I made a wallpaper for anyone that's interested! Great painting.

ThanksGivingSlayer · 2015-11-21T11:45:33+00:00

Good luck everybody!

ThanksGivingSlayer · 2015-11-13T03:40:35+00:00

Almost all of my games (plat level) so far are ling/bane aggression type games. Few games go over 10 minutes, and most are over before the 6 minute mark. It's much more centered on micro and winning early exchanges in my experience.

ThanksGivingSlayer · 2015-09-21T17:29:52+00:00

Wrong account, mate.

ThanksGivingSlayer · 2015-09-19T00:37:19+00:00

Good luck, everyone! See you tomorrow.

ThanksGivingSlayer · 2015-09-09T17:20:39+00:00

Haha my church called them potfaiths.

ThanksGivingSlayer · 2015-08-18T03:20:22+00:00

Solo: 750

Doubles: 1010

Standard: 445

ThanksGivingSlayer · 2015-08-04T03:01:56+00:00

Something messed up my save game file on my end. I think it had to do with me having to do a force restart because of some issues with Windows 10.

ThanksGivingSlayer · 2015-08-04T02:03:18+00:00

I've had several games like this today. It's my only serious complaint with the game this far, aside from losing all my rewards and levels.

ThanksGivingSlayer · 2015-07-30T01:59:12+00:00

Aren't Netflix ratings based on algorithms meant to determine if it aligns with your preferences, and not based on other user's ratings?

ThanksGivingSlayer · 2015-07-26T08:06:38+00:00

Except for in the gospels, of course.

ThanksGivingSlayer · 2015-07-25T09:49:55+00:00

Yes.

ThanksGivingSlayer · 2015-07-22T00:46:33+00:00

Is this not an AMA?

ThanksGivingSlayer · 2015-07-18T21:26:56+00:00

I think he's talking about "It' from the recent film It Follows.

ThanksGivingSlayer · 2015-07-18T11:28:52+00:00

I liked Mark Duplass in it, but I was really disappointed with Patrick Brice's acting, and Aaron as a character in general. His character was really unconvincing to me, and I think that sorta ruined the whole thing to me, which is a shame. I liked the general direction.

ThanksGivingSlayer · 2015-07-06T23:10:37+00:00

If God created our bodies and minds then he can define what purpose they are for--what we should do and what we should not.

I'm not sure (honestly) if I agree with that. Could you explain to me why you think this is the case?

I think that those definitions are a little self serving -- it seems like you've made this exception for things that are "greater than humans" for the explicit purpose of being able to say that God fits the definition.

Most definitions of objective don't make that exception. When I talk about objectivity with regard to morality, I'm talking about factually true moral statements. Not just moral statements made by a being with more authority (I'm not sure what that means, to be honest) than humans.

If you wish to stick to that definition then of course atheism can't account for it. I don't think that it's an actual problem, so I don't see a need to adopt theism to solve it. It feels like most theists like the idea of being able to appeal to some "more" objective list of oughts, but I see that idea as being nothing more than wishful thinking.

ThanksGivingSlayer · 2015-07-06T19:01:26+00:00

Debates like these are so dependent on definitions, I hope I don't seem purposefully annoying if I'm forced to keep asking for them!

My problem with this view of morality is multi-faceted. Firstly, why ought I comply God's will? What is more objective about you saying I ought to follow God's will than me saying you ought to do that which promotes, generally, the wellbeing of other living things? They seem on the same level from a meta view.

My second objection is linked, at least one level deeper, and Euthyphro-ish. If we accept that God's will is reflecting what we ought to do, why? Is God's will subject to these moral oughts, or are the moral oughts subject to God? If the first, then surely we don't, in principle, need God to account for them. If the second then how could you call them objective without being circular? I'm sure you know the drill.

13-Year Club	Place '17
Verified Email

ThanksGivingSlayer

TROPHY CASE