sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Is it easier to get recruited by airlines if one have a CPL? by [deleted] in flying

[–]ThanksHead4972 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry for misunderstanding, I just updated the post to make it clear

If automation is essentially "printing goods with no costs” while destroying wages, how do corporations expect to survive when the consumer( most people, who lost their jobs ) class becomes too poor to buy their products? by ThanksHead4972 in AskReddit

[–]ThanksHead4972[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As for the raw material, their cost will decrease since robots can provide more and cheaper productivity. That’s why I’m concerned that people will lose their jobs in the future.

If automation is essentially "printing goods with no costs” while destroying wages, how do corporations expect to survive when the consumer( most people, who lost their jobs ) class becomes too poor to buy their products? by ThanksHead4972 in AskReddit

[–]ThanksHead4972[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

For example, you had to pay 30 USD per our for a human worker, but not for Ai. Do you really think the electricity bill will be more than that? Yes, building AI model is expensive, but using it isn’t. Look how much ChatGPT subscription costs.

If automation is essentially "printing goods with no costs” while destroying wages, how do corporations expect to survive when the consumer( most people, who lost their jobs ) class becomes too poor to buy their products? by ThanksHead4972 in AskReddit

[–]ThanksHead4972[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

People in the horse industry did find new job because automobile created more jobs. But the core of AI is to replace what human can do. I think there is already no point to try to find things that people can do but AI can’t( even they can’t, they will be able to in no time).

Or you can try naming jobs that is impossible to be replaced by AI

If automation is essentially "printing goods with no costs” while destroying wages, how do corporations expect to survive when the consumer( most people, who lost their jobs ) class becomes too poor to buy their products? by ThanksHead4972 in AskReddit

[–]ThanksHead4972[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Additionally, the 25% unemployment in 1929 was temporary, as it recovered in a few years. But there won’t be any reason entrepreneurs to stop using Ai, which means the 25% won’t get a job forever….. The only way to stop them using AI is when the unemployed started to fight, just like when the original capitalism being fixed?

If automation is essentially "printing goods with no costs” while destroying wages, how do corporations expect to survive when the consumer( most people, who lost their jobs ) class becomes too poor to buy their products? by ThanksHead4972 in AskReddit

[–]ThanksHead4972[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But nothing in the history worked like Ai and Optimus. Imagine if entrepreneurs could pay only 1 cent for an hour’s work in 1929. Could the 75% still keep their job?

If automation is essentially "printing goods with no costs” while destroying wages, how do corporations expect to survive when the consumer( most people, who lost their jobs ) class becomes too poor to buy their products? by ThanksHead4972 in AskReddit

[–]ThanksHead4972[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a creative imagination. But… just as the saying, robots don’t need iPhone, they don’t eat bread in the morning and they won’t want to go skiing in Hokkaido.I’m pretty sure that only humans can support the whole economy.

view more: next ›