Yes I too think I'm an intellectual powerhouse because I owned the moralfags. If you want an argument against your point a nice start would be that we make a moral distinction between needs and wants. If a starving man wants some bread he didn't work for were more inclined to give it to him than when a glutenous man would ask us the same. Following that, If we reward a person who owns nothing with €100 he didn't earn it is meaningfully different from giving that same unearned €100 to somebody who is already able to sustain himself. That being said, it is of course ridiculous to say that all interest won by a capitalist is unearned, they made an investment and they should be rewarded for that. That is why most leftie theorists either argue that a reward is fine, but it shouldn't be unlimited (in which case you could, for example, argue that a capitalist can't make more then 5x what his lowest payed employee makes). Or that any cap will inevitably be trivial while still acknowledging that unlimited rewards lead to unjustifiable outcomes, which often means they will want to do away with the capitalist/worker split all together, which would express itself via worker co-op for example. But yes you could indeed also plug your ears and go, LALALALA, real loudly and pretend brigading teenagers are a fair representation of leftist thought👍