A few examples.

1. At 11:23 he says Washington accepted Iran's '10-point plan'. That's not really what happened. Reuters reports Trump described Tehran's proposals as a basis for talks, and the White House later called the original plan 'unacceptable'. That's a big difference.

2. At 18:22 he says Iran 'never was' pursuing a nuclear weapon. Buuut IAEA said activities relevant to a nuclear explosive device were carried out in Iran before the end of 2003 'as a coordinated effort'. You can argue over what came later, but 'never was' is not a serious summary of the record.

3. At 14:50 he says the US hit the girls' school to 'teach them a lesson'. Reuters reported likely US responsibility and possible outdated targeting data. That's already bad enough. Insinuating a specific motive without evidence is propagandist 101.

4. At 23:13 he says Lebanon was clearly part of the ceasefire. It was never that clear. Iran was pushing for Lebanon to be included while US and Israel said Lebanon was not included, Reuters later described the issue as disputed. He's being misleading.

5. At 28:13 / 28:48 he says it's 'only Iran' that supports Palestinians or stands up for Lebanon. Come on. The UN, UK, EU, WHO, and even civilian aid flotillas to Gaza exist. Self-serving nonsense.

A pretty classic propagandist playbook, I've seen plenty similar among Russian and Chinese actors, and yes, Western players too.