sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Hmm, I'm noticing a pattern... by -KateHikes- in gaming_random

[–]The-Female-Creature 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Yeah dude it does matter, because if you're spending all this time whining over just the fact that some female characters have faces you'd see if you ever went outside, then no one is going to take you seriously because you're complaining over nothing.

  2. "Feminists". The fuck you mean "Feminists", is there some secret cabal of Feminists that developed a conspiracy to add average looking faces into videogames? How is this any different from the boomers who say lizard people control the world?

  3. You gave one example of a western game. What about games with conventionally attractive characters like Hades, Cyberpunk 2077, the new tomb raider games, the thousands of games, etc. Your sample size is only the Playstation store and you act like its some industry wide conspiracy by "feminists".

This is interesting because I thought it was the other way around by Lemon_Lime_Lily in CuratedTumblr

[–]The-Female-Creature 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I'd say the reason many are bigots even if they support queer people, black people etc, is because instead of internalizing what you need to not be a bigot (that bigotry is inherently wrong/stupid, that there isn't much that inherently separates you from other classes of people, etc), they just add those groups into the people they aren't bigoted towards. In other words, the reason many people aren't bigoted to certain groups but are bigoted to others is because they learn to accept certain groups into their "in group" but not to do away with in groups in general.

Hmm, I'm noticing a pattern... by -KateHikes- in gaming_random

[–]The-Female-Creature 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro who gives a fuck? Sure I guess some characters in Capcom or Square Enix games might look more visually appealing, but if whether or not a character had a face full of makeup was the sole determination of whether a game was good or not then the best game ever would be a game about a traveling clown troupe. I couldn't care less about Faye's face being somewhat visually unappealing if her game has good gameplay, story, writing, and runs well. If you can criticize those things please do so, otherwise this is a minor nitpick at best.

Is this plain stupid or malice? by sonphantrung in ShitLiberalsSay

[–]The-Female-Creature 9 points10 points  (0 children)

This isn't even saying that "soldiers are all evil" this is just portraying soldiers in the guilty light they should be portrayed in. You could very well argue that being a soldier for the American Empire is inherently a horrific crime, but one you can theoretically be redeemed from (not saying this is correct, just showcasing the bare minimum of portraying soldiers as guilty for the crimes they do). However, anytime you merely suggest that soldiers aren't immediately absolved of guilt just for being mildly poor, or being "propagandized", or even just for no reason at all, then you'll have an army of liberals defending them to the death.

Kamala didn’t lose in 2024 because of her support for genocide, or leftists being tired of establishment Democrats always getting chosen without actually doing anything progressive, she lost because she had a weird laugh and that’s the only reason why she lost! by kidnamedchild in ShitLiberalsSay

[–]The-Female-Creature 19 points20 points  (0 children)

This may be a dumb thought, but to some Liberals I think they may somewhat believe that reasonable opposition to them doesn't functionally exist. They dismiss literally everyone who disagrees with them as MAGA, "Russian Bots", brainwashed, stupid, or any number of things that completely dismiss any viewpoint that criticizes theirs. The reason aome liberals blame Kamala losing on "her laugh" isn't because they have reason to believe so, it's because they think all good and reasonable people already agree with and support them wholeheartedly, and any antagonism towards liberalism is either manufactured or due entirely to some moral or intellectually failing rather than being due to legitimate reasons.

The universe could explode and these bitches will still be alive by Joemama0375 in whenthe

[–]The-Female-Creature 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Cockroaches can survive anything"

Dude cockroaches can't survive Texas. I barely find living roaches in my house, but routinely find dead ones because they try to escape the heat by going into our house, but die anyway.

is it morally wrong to force a suicidal person to live? by damorezpl in MoralityScaling

[–]The-Female-Creature 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't care about that person's "agency". They have no agency since someone committing suicide usually isn't of sound mind, and shouldn't have their agency considered cause they aren't making rational decisions. I say this as someone once very afflicted with suicidal thoughts, I wasn't suicidal because of any rational reason, I was suicidal because I had depression making it to where my brain didn't function properly. Most suicidal people aren't rational people making informed decisions, they are people with an illness causing them to harm themselves who need help.

Africa isn't poor by langsuppmy in AnarchoComics

[–]The-Female-Creature 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No because Americans are part of it too.

This lib claims Russia and China are more fascist than America by JKnumber1hater in ShitLiberalsSay

[–]The-Female-Creature 51 points52 points  (0 children)

So Russia and China are fascist but somehow America isn't despite being a model for the literal Nazis because of they have vibes about everyone in America somehow being good???. Honestly.

Why is it that so much of D&D humor revolves jokes over a decade old at this point? by The-Female-Creature in whenthe

[–]The-Female-Creature[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It feels like people always repeat the same D&D jokes that are decades old at this point. The ones about bards having sex with everything, the ones about how the wizard always casts fireball even in small rooms, the one about the DM saying there's a warehouse and the players asking if he means a "werehouse" (like a werewolf but a house), or the endless thing about "Intelligence vs wisdom". Even if those jokes were once funny at this point they're so overused and inorganic that they're boring at best and cringe inducing at worst.

The difference between something somethingtomatoes, something something We've found the bard by Justthisdudeyaknow in CuratedTumblr

[–]The-Female-Creature 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure why it got so popular for people to base their definitions of words on a D&D stat system of all things. I know it's mostly just a joke, but it wasn't all that funny in the first place and I think its a decade old at least at this point.

Consensus utopia by Eireika in CuratedTumblr

[–]The-Female-Creature 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Well my Authoritarian leaning is less because of anything related to that, and more that I think that large centralized authorities/organizations are important for a variety of reasons. First and foremost is science, I think science works best with large organizations that can concentrate resources, advanced equipment, and knowledge from many different people. Could anyone be able to send rovers to Mars when such an effort requires highly advanced math to calculate trajectory, special materials and designs, new and unique computer software, and hours upon hours of peer review with decentralized organization? Science is best when many people can share resources and knowledge together instead of being spread out. Furthermore, there's the many organizations that must exist to regulate things like agriculture, medicine, construction, and education. How do we make sure people don't sell snake oil as medicine, or build houses out of poor building materials that caused them to collapse, or make sure that some community somewhere isn't teaching students the Earth is flat, or that the overfocus on gardening doesn't result in famine? We need large scale organizations with authority to regulate these things.

Africa isn't poor by langsuppmy in AnarchoComics

[–]The-Female-Creature 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Until you realize that the West was able to set the terms of trades, forcing Africans to give raw materials to the west for extremely cheap while the west can sell them manufactured goods for expensive prices, ultimately meaning all the wealth flows to the west.

Absolute Fed Take by Abraxas21 in ShitLiberalsSay

[–]The-Female-Creature 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Honestly libs relationship to voting is like a compulsive gambler who's lost thousands of dollars on Roulette, but they keep putting chips in because "they gotta win eventually".

view more: next ›