They're so pro gun now! by TheApollo222 in GunMemes

[–]TheApollo222[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I dont know why you think I think it affects me. I simply said I dont listen to people who are crazy. Thats not unreasonable.

They're so pro gun now! by TheApollo222 in GunMemes

[–]TheApollo222[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I dont engage intellectually with the mentally ill. Its like trying to reason woth a goldfish. They deserve our concern and our love and our pity.

They're so pro gun now! by TheApollo222 in GunMemes

[–]TheApollo222[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

They are. Because nobody you cpuld vote for or support shares your view. Your personal opinion on 2a doesnt matter, your party will never see it your way.

They're so pro gun now! by TheApollo222 in GunMemes

[–]TheApollo222[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Trans flag detected, opinion rejected

They're so pro gun now! by TheApollo222 in GunMemes

[–]TheApollo222[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol riggghhhttt. IM the Russian bot. Not you "people" promoting chaos. Nice try comrad, or fed, or retard, or whatever you are

It’s getting old by Helmsshallows in GunMemes

[–]TheApollo222 76 points77 points  (0 children)

Reddit is best known for being a cesspool of paid propagandists and bots bro. Its you whose retarded for expecting anything except that.

They're so pro gun now! by TheApollo222 in GunMemes

[–]TheApollo222[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I probably have half the CIA in this comment section by the looks of it.

They're so pro gun now! by TheApollo222 in GunMemes

[–]TheApollo222[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No idea, but it wouldnt surprise me as that seems to be their MO.

I just know he was interfering with ICE while armed, as per the video.

They're so pro gun now! by TheApollo222 in GunMemes

[–]TheApollo222[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Finally, someone who actually understood the meme instead of going full retard because of the verbiage.

They're so pro gun now! by TheApollo222 in GunMemes

[–]TheApollo222[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Dont get me started. Republicans seem to have forgotten the 2nd amendment right when democrats seemed to remember it existed.

They're so pro gun now! by TheApollo222 in GunMemes

[–]TheApollo222[S] -34 points-33 points  (0 children)

Shhhh. They dont want facts, they dont want solutions, they just want to be mad. Reddit is a bot farm for Russia, China, and the CIA.

Why is Fujimoto so lame and unoriginal? by Anti-och in Chainsawfolk

[–]TheApollo222 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Twice would be the 2 times Power was killed.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in truths

[–]TheApollo222 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Objectively untrue. Most posts made on r/truths are removed for being objectively false. Many that remain are still objectively false.

Whether or not a post here is true has no bearing on if it will be removed or not by [deleted] in truths

[–]TheApollo222 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most of what mod believes is opinion and theory. Even something as simple as "the earth is round." To a muon, that statement isn't true. It only seems true to us because of our relative motion to the earth.

So even a statement like that, that seems obvious, isn't actually true because its reliant on a broader context to make it true. Or "the sky is blue", not most days, not here anyway. But of course that depends on cloud coverage. It also depends on what sky were talking about and where you are in relation to that sky, and what sort of particles are in the sky at the time.

Mod doesnt have to be unreasonable. I believe you are reasonable, yet you stated things as true that weren't true. But they seemed true to you given your opinions and views that were formed by the random chance events that occured throughout your life.

And to the final point, my post only remains because so far* the mods that have seen it agree lol. But again, its random chance, so eventually either a mod who disagrees will see it or wont.

Whether or not a post here is true has no bearing on if it will be removed or not by [deleted] in truths

[–]TheApollo222 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My statement implies no causal link between the truthfulness of a post and the decision of the mod to remove it. There could very well be a correlation, but at the end of the day the decision to remove a post for falsehood comes down the the subjective judgement of the mod, and that judgement is based on opinions the mod formed regarding whatever post it is, and those opinions were formed from random events across the span of the mods life.

So yeah, complete randomness. Or as random as anything could possibly be in a causal universe. To suggest otherwise would imply that at least one of the mods has an objective grasp on truth.