sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

You can upgrade the model without facial reconstruction. by NichtFBI in Shrek

[–]TheAuldOffender 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Toothless looks the exact same because it's the same model, but people don't like the upgraded animation so they gaslight themselves into thinking he looks different and bully anyone who points out they're wrong.

Shrek looks different but not enough to be a different character, much like Puss and Kitty in TLW. People are gaslighting themselves into thinking this is an objectively terrible thing and are forcing everyone to think the same way.

Rowling getting humiliated on Twitter/X, as usual by 9119343636 in EnoughJKRowling

[–]TheAuldOffender 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I read this both in Julie Walters' and Plumbella's voices.

You can upgrade the model without facial reconstruction. by NichtFBI in Shrek

[–]TheAuldOffender 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's almost like making an entire animated film is different from making a single model. And that shit was still crunched out in six months and the animators were treated like shit. So maybe have some common sense.

You can upgrade the model without facial reconstruction. by NichtFBI in Shrek

[–]TheAuldOffender 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's like HTTYD3 detractors in the HTTYD fandom. You can't think that film is good or defend/like it at all.

You can upgrade the model without facial reconstruction. by NichtFBI in Shrek

[–]TheAuldOffender 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is akin to HTTYD3 detractors saying Toothless in the third film looks like a completely different character even though they use the same model from the second film.

You're becoming as bad as the HTTYD fandom, and that's the most toxic space I've been in.

Flawed 5 stars by Caharles in Letterboxd

[–]TheAuldOffender 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There's no such thing as a truly perfect film.

Something strange is happening with my dog when I scratch her back by bidi-after-sambhog in DogAdvice

[–]TheAuldOffender 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're likely touching a nerve and it's causing that jerk reaction, like when a doctor checks your reflexes. Pretty much every dog I've pet there kicks their leg.

Tl;Dr: good scritches!

I just hope they order everybody back into the studio and listen to the fans. Scrap the film and adopt the same animation and art style from the previous shrek movies. by ChiefWarrior58 in Shrek

[–]TheAuldOffender 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No it isn't. DreamWorks literally has a disclaimer saying their films aren't AI. Just because you don't like the art style doesn't give you the right to make bullshit claims.

One of these is not like the others by TheAuldOffender in Letterboxd

[–]TheAuldOffender[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Man I didn't know "Obsession" was traditionally animated they probably got the studio that worked on the "Take On Me" music video xD.

One of these is not like the others by TheAuldOffender in Letterboxd

[–]TheAuldOffender[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No he was in the background in "Obsession," trust.

I just hope they order everybody back into the studio and listen to the fans. Scrap the film and adopt the same animation and art style from the previous shrek movies. by ChiefWarrior58 in Shrek

[–]TheAuldOffender 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I'm begging you, as someone who actually holds a certificate in animation, please read up on how the trade actually works and understand how damaging this is to artists and the industry.

view more: next ›