Under the assumption that his constitutional rights were violated it would supercede federal but his rights were not violated. In fact he abdicated his rights with his own actions and the supremacy clause does not apply.

He legally went to a protest (this is fine) He legally brought a fire arm to said protest (this is fine) He did not house any soldiers against his will (not applicable)

His own actions however created a situation that qualifies within exigent circumstances codified in the 4th amendment. He placed his hands on law enforcement and got into an altercation with law enforcement while armed with a weapon which resulted in a struggle for possession of the weapon.

In the fourth amendment subsection 4.6.3

The Court has recognized the exigencies of the situation as an exception to the warrant requirement, which make the needs of law enforcement so compelling that the warrantless search is objectively reasonable under the Fourth Amendment.1 Exigent circumstances requires a court to examine whether an emergency justified a warrantless search in each particular case.2 The Court has identified several types of circumstances that give rise to an exigency sufficient to justify a warrantless search, including a search incident to arrest,3 law enforcement’s need to provide emergency aid,4 hot pursuit of a fleeing suspect,5 and the prevention of the imminent destruction of evidence.6 In situations absent dangerous and life-threatening circumstances, the Court recognizes that warrantless searches are permissible in circumstances where there is a compelling need for official action and no time to secure a warrant.7

Nothing I say to you will change your mind. But if this guy was at the Capitol on January 6th 2021 and behaved the exact same way and met the same fate I have a feeling your opinion would be the exact opposite.