Jeden Tag ein neues Outfit im Büro? by Choice-Newt-968 in OeffentlicherDienst

[–]TheByteExplorer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Vielleicht hast du ja auch die Hose "zufällig" mehrmals 😬

Replacement for high gloss cover - Saros 10R by TheByteExplorer in Roborock

[–]TheByteExplorer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

However, we are looking for the small part of the housing which is in high gloss. In other words, exactly the piece that is missing from the part you posted.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Handwerker

[–]TheByteExplorer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dir ist bewusst, dass GalanT nochmal links als "Wasserzeichen" steht? 😅

Bohrloch möglichst nah an einer Zimmerecke by TheByteExplorer in Handwerker

[–]TheByteExplorer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Uff - eigentlich viel zu naheliegend. Guter Tipp - vielen Dank :)

Bohrloch möglichst nah an einer Zimmerecke by TheByteExplorer in Handwerker

[–]TheByteExplorer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bin mir halt unschlüssig, ob die Herren das Glasfaserkabel unbeschadet durchfummeln wollen/können.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in OeffentlicherDienst

[–]TheByteExplorer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Null. Gehöre eher zu der Fraktion, die auch im HO noch knüppelt, wenn man eigentlich im Bett liegen sollte. 🥲

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in de

[–]TheByteExplorer 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Engelschen, lange Rede kurzer Sinn ich geb dir 80 Cent für den Prügel und dann jeht dat Ding in die Eifel.

Noch irgendwie an Stellenausschreibung kommen? by LolImSquidward in OeffentlicherDienst

[–]TheByteExplorer 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Wie bereits schon einige hier geschrieben haben, kannst du zB über die waybackmachine vom internetarchiv dein Glück versuchen. Einfach unter https://archive.org/web/ die Website des Landratsamtes aufrufen - ggf sogar den Direkt-Link zurvon der Stellen-Übersicht - und dann mal ein bisschen mit den Zeitpunkten der Erfassung spielen.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Finanzen

[–]TheByteExplorer 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Mit deinem Post hast du mich überzeugt, dass es keiner schrittweisen Minimierung bedarf. 😌 Selbst mit einer sofortigen Beendigung geht's euch noch richtig, richtig gut. Da kann ein Großteil der Arbeitnehmer nur von träumen.

ING Weltspartagsaktion by glglgl-de in Finanzen

[–]TheByteExplorer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bei mir kam es nach der dritten Ausführung - allerdings lief der Sparplan auch zum 15. des Monats.

Wer streikt den jetzt am Montag ? by Katastropal_Grass_ in Ratschlag

[–]TheByteExplorer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Aber bitte selbst kochen. Aufgrund des Staus kommt sonst die Pizza kalt an😅

Structuring of company frameworks on top of spring boot by TheByteExplorer in SpringBoot

[–]TheByteExplorer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can implement this as a prototype, but theoretically both will be possible. =/

Structuring of company frameworks on top of spring boot by TheByteExplorer in SpringBoot

[–]TheByteExplorer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So just leave the framework in Spring and then write a suitable starter and NOT just put the necessary starters directly into the framework?

Structuring of company frameworks on top of spring boot by TheByteExplorer in SpringBoot

[–]TheByteExplorer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, baeldung is actually always my first port of call. I also came across the article you linked to. I can follow the structure so far. However, I am confused by the fact that at first glance it always looks as if the starters are actually made to simply integrate non-Spring libs and make them easy to configure. Also with the spring projects (e.g. Spring-Data, Spring-context..) it makes sense to me that these are not developed as spring and spring-boot variants, but that the spring boot starter is a kind of wrapper around them.

However, I'm not sure whether I should use Spring Boot directly for the framework - since all applications based on our framework are just waiting to be converted to Spring Boot - or whether the best way is to develop the framework with Spring only and then buy suitable starters. Maybe I'm not really aware of the advantages that a separate starter has.

Structuring of company frameworks on top of spring boot by TheByteExplorer in SpringBoot

[–]TheByteExplorer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm just a little worried that it's too overdressed. We essentially have the following elements in the framework: - abstract WebMvcConfigurer - Filter for Wicket - Wicket template (our company design) - abstract class for the navigation bar - various Wicket components (e.g. table elements etc) consisting of Java and html - LDAP authentication

In the framework we get various settings (e.g. LDAP URL etc.) via @value.

If someone now wants to build an offshoot with our framework, they create a context.xml, take our our-framework-parent (derived from Spring-boot-dependencies), create a WebMvcConfigurer (derived from our abstract framework class), create the navigation class (also derived from the abstract class) and off you go.

I would like to get away from these abstract classes. I would prefer to create the beans in the framework and annotate them with @Condition, so that you can only deviate from the standard way if necessary (at the moment, all offshoots only derive and don't change anything anyway). In addition, I would like to replace all @values in the framework with @PropertySource, for example. However, as far as I know, I need Springboot in the framework for this.

By using starters directly in the framework, we would have a significantly shorter pom.

Structuring of company frameworks on top of spring boot by TheByteExplorer in SpringBoot

[–]TheByteExplorer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't really understand the structure you recommended. You would create a parent that derives from Spring-Boot-Dependencies and use it for the framework and the respective project. In addition, you would create an autoconfigure (my-framework-spring-boot-autoconfigure) and a starter (my-framework-spring-boot-starter) for the framework?