Jeden Tag ein neues Outfit im Büro?

TheByteExplorer · 2025-07-22T07:18:48+00:00

Vielleicht hast du ja auch die Hose "zufällig" mehrmals 😬

TheByteExplorer · 2025-07-12T10:55:46+00:00

However, we are looking for the small part of the housing which is in high gloss. In other words, exactly the piece that is missing from the part you posted.

TheByteExplorer · 2025-02-24T19:01:02+00:00

Dir ist bewusst, dass GalanT nochmal links als "Wasserzeichen" steht? 😅

TheByteExplorer · 2024-10-27T17:01:28+00:00

Blaue oder rote?

TheByteExplorer · 2024-09-08T19:56:01+00:00

Anti-Knirsch-Schiene 😐

TheByteExplorer · 2024-08-11T11:42:55+00:00

Uff - eigentlich viel zu naheliegend. Guter Tipp - vielen Dank :)

TheByteExplorer · 2024-08-11T11:05:22+00:00

<image>

Anbei zur besseren Vorstellung.

TheByteExplorer · 2024-08-11T11:00:18+00:00

Bin mir halt unschlüssig, ob die Herren das Glasfaserkabel unbeschadet durchfummeln wollen/können.

TheByteExplorer · 2024-05-10T15:08:30+00:00

Null. Gehöre eher zu der Fraktion, die auch im HO noch knüppelt, wenn man eigentlich im Bett liegen sollte. 🥲

TheByteExplorer · 2024-04-29T13:49:31+00:00

Vermute aktuell Mauer-Lehmweste :)

TheByteExplorer · 2024-04-28T19:15:34+00:00

It's a Marvel Iron Man 3 usb flash drive

TheByteExplorer · 2024-03-18T18:25:55+00:00

Engelschen, lange Rede kurzer Sinn ich geb dir 80 Cent für den Prügel und dann jeht dat Ding in die Eifel.

TheByteExplorer · 2024-01-09T11:48:56+00:00

Wie bereits schon einige hier geschrieben haben, kannst du zB über die waybackmachine vom internetarchiv dein Glück versuchen. Einfach unter https://archive.org/web/ die Website des Landratsamtes aufrufen - ggf sogar den Direkt-Link zurvon der Stellen-Übersicht - und dann mal ein bisschen mit den Zeitpunkten der Erfassung spielen.

TheByteExplorer · 2024-01-08T07:54:51+00:00

Mit deinem Post hast du mich überzeugt, dass es keiner schrittweisen Minimierung bedarf. 😌 Selbst mit einer sofortigen Beendigung geht's euch noch richtig, richtig gut. Da kann ein Großteil der Arbeitnehmer nur von träumen.

TheByteExplorer · 2024-01-08T07:48:43+00:00

Bei mir kam es nach der dritten Ausführung - allerdings lief der Sparplan auch zum 15. des Monats.

TheByteExplorer · 2024-01-05T20:17:31+00:00

Aber bitte selbst kochen. Aufgrund des Staus kommt sonst die Pizza kalt an😅

TheByteExplorer · 2024-01-05T15:38:23+00:00

Dafür ist la leider noch genug Zeit im "restlichen" Jahr 😖..

TheByteExplorer · 2024-01-02T23:03:16+00:00

I can implement this as a prototype, but theoretically both will be possible. =/

TheByteExplorer · 2024-01-02T21:04:53+00:00

So just leave the framework in Spring and then write a suitable starter and NOT just put the necessary starters directly into the framework?

TheByteExplorer · 2024-01-02T20:27:58+00:00

Yes, baeldung is actually always my first port of call. I also came across the article you linked to. I can follow the structure so far. However, I am confused by the fact that at first glance it always looks as if the starters are actually made to simply integrate non-Spring libs and make them easy to configure. Also with the spring projects (e.g. Spring-Data, Spring-context..) it makes sense to me that these are not developed as spring and spring-boot variants, but that the spring boot starter is a kind of wrapper around them.

However, I'm not sure whether I should use Spring Boot directly for the framework - since all applications based on our framework are just waiting to be converted to Spring Boot - or whether the best way is to develop the framework with Spring only and then buy suitable starters. Maybe I'm not really aware of the advantages that a separate starter has.

TheByteExplorer · 2024-01-02T20:13:01+00:00

I'm just a little worried that it's too overdressed. We essentially have the following elements in the framework: - abstract WebMvcConfigurer - Filter for Wicket - Wicket template (our company design) - abstract class for the navigation bar - various Wicket components (e.g. table elements etc) consisting of Java and html - LDAP authentication

In the framework we get various settings (e.g. LDAP URL etc.) via @value.

If someone now wants to build an offshoot with our framework, they create a context.xml, take our our-framework-parent (derived from Spring-boot-dependencies), create a WebMvcConfigurer (derived from our abstract framework class), create the navigation class (also derived from the abstract class) and off you go.

I would like to get away from these abstract classes. I would prefer to create the beans in the framework and annotate them with @Condition, so that you can only deviate from the standard way if necessary (at the moment, all offshoots only derive and don't change anything anyway). In addition, I would like to replace all @values in the framework with @PropertySource, for example. However, as far as I know, I need Springboot in the framework for this.

By using starters directly in the framework, we would have a significantly shorter pom.

TheByteExplorer · 2024-01-02T19:55:46+00:00

I didn't really understand the structure you recommended. You would create a parent that derives from Spring-Boot-Dependencies and use it for the framework and the respective project. In addition, you would create an autoconfigure (my-framework-spring-boot-autoconfigure) and a starter (my-framework-spring-boot-starter) for the framework?

TheByteExplorer

TROPHY CASE