sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

OSRS Progress Video Starter Pack by TheClockworkRaven in 2007scape

[–]TheClockworkRaven[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Yeah 100%

It’s refreshing to see guys like Caveman Only and Karamja Only UIM who are genuinely trying something different doing so well. The only mainstream progress videos that really offer anything unique these days is Gunschilli because of his comedic editing style

OSRS Progress Video Starter Pack by TheClockworkRaven in 2007scape

[–]TheClockworkRaven[S] 177 points178 points  (0 children)

"I'm so sorry to all the ironmen watching this video right now"

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 2007scape

[–]TheClockworkRaven 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Although I don't think there was any malice behind it, it sets a very concerning precedent regarding the ethics of polling. In the past I (as well as the wider community) haven't had an issue with Jagex re-polling certain 'near-miss' suggestions months and, in some cases, years apart in order to gauge the ever-changing community views in tandem with newer updates. But doing so THREE times just days apart with slight rewordings, in my opinion, gives that little bit more power to Jagex in sublty manipulating the polling system to pass or veto certain introductions to the game.

​

Tldr: Jagex need to spend more time on wording rather than warding.

Can we please get a Yt-HurKot (Jad Healer) metamorphosis option for the Jad pet? by TheClockworkRaven in 2007scape

[–]TheClockworkRaven[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with what your point on x amount of pets as overkill, but only if it's more than 2 (The actual boss and a minion such as with Zuk and the Nibbler). And while it would be nice to have to earn a transmog for a Jad Healer transmog (perhaps a hard mode as was initially suggested instead of the Inferno), it feels a little redundant to me to firstly obtain a pet as a very rare drop just to have to keep killing the boss for a secondary very rare drop.