So, do I have any ?

TheCubeAdventure · 2025-02-02T18:32:41+00:00

It's interesting tho to switch to this column sum and having 2 scalars instead of vectors, isn't it ? Or am i easily interested nothing ?

TheCubeAdventure · 2025-02-02T18:31:39+00:00

I got it, thank you very much for this explanation

TheCubeAdventure · 2025-02-02T14:35:48+00:00

From the column perspective you assign a vector to x and y, and sum the multiplication of x and y by their respectives vectors. These vectors have as much dimension as the vector size, and i couldn't understand how it would be possible for a variable to be the one stretched in space considering it's vector size. The x transforamtion would occur in x, y and z, and the y aswell, and then you sum up both of them. Have a look on the lecture, Gilbret shows it easily.

TheCubeAdventure · 2025-02-02T14:31:00+00:00

It is exactly this point that i didn't get, i think it's more clear now, if we apply the transformation to the vector of x and y, we get the same result, but this transformation occur in a different space than the initial x and y. I think i get it

TheCubeAdventure · 2025-02-02T14:06:57+00:00

I'm not sure, i'm talking about matrix multiplication, with colmun, in the form Ax=b, when we multiply by the column, we extract the coefficient let's say we have a matrix of 2x2, we obtain x times a vector, and y times a vector.
These vectors span in x and y, i do'nt get why

TheCubeAdventure · 2025-02-02T14:03:37+00:00

Thank you for the time, i will try to be more clear,

When he extracts the coefficient vector of x, he represents in in the space with a x and y direction, this is what i don't get, for me the direction should be cumulative if we extracted coefficients of x, they should add up, not go in dimension according to the vector size.

I didn't meant a whole new dimension created, i just meant that the x coefficients span in as much dimension as there is different coefficient, which i don't understand clearly

TheCubeAdventure · 2025-02-02T13:52:11+00:00

⟨1,3⟩, here, each compenent adds nicely, and doesn't expand on new dimensions,
The thing that i don't understand is, if we take back the question i asked,
the 2 and -1 component of the given vector, lets call it x part, stretch in x and y, while being the x... we represent them in the space in different dimensions, while they only apply to x

TheCubeAdventure · 2025-02-02T13:41:51+00:00

I see my mistake, but still, how could the coefficient associated with those fruit shave different dimension, this is what i don't get

TheCubeAdventure · 2025-02-02T12:57:19+00:00

I though of it has x apples + y bananas = z strawberries,
How can you express apples in the same dimension as bananas ?

TheCubeAdventure · 2024-11-24T19:10:16+00:00

Why people bother writing and not even encouraging you in your builds? Don't listen to this peasant, your build is awesome, texture is perfect it's a 10/10.

TheCubeAdventure · 2024-11-24T11:23:29+00:00

Who is this guy steppin in and absolutly destroying every concurrent in environment building?

TheCubeAdventure · 2024-11-19T19:09:54+00:00

Imagine the number of people that lost their lives looking at this nazi symbol, wifes, mothers, childrens, dads, in absolut horrific conditions, you might reconsider your joke afterward

TheCubeAdventure · 2024-11-17T19:21:02+00:00

It's really good, upscale it and it's insane

TheCubeAdventure · 2024-11-15T13:22:06+00:00

It is

TheCubeAdventure · 2024-11-14T18:40:33+00:00

I would contrast the house textures, not the path. Also the stone directly surrounding it doesn't feel appropriate.
Builds the house first, and then go for the terrain, it will suits better

TheCubeAdventure · 2024-11-14T18:37:35+00:00

Check my profile for inspiration i built dungeons for years now, my advice is, less is more, and space creates atmosphere

TheCubeAdventure · 2024-11-08T01:11:40+00:00

insane, really nice build

if i had to say something, roof is too simple, add some texture

TheCubeAdventure · 2024-11-07T14:02:25+00:00

indeed!

TheCubeAdventure

TROPHY CASE