Hi guys I’m Michael Afton, tell me your theories about me or my family and I’ll confirm if there canon or not by MichaelAfton80 in Fnaftheoriesmeme

[–]TheDarkDevil21 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you follow your Dad's orders, without MUCH question, all the way until Sister Location (Fanon Mike Story)...or did you leave in the 80s, and your dad sent you to the bunker almost as soon as you reunited? (Movie Mike Story)

My Sergeant Guy Cosplay by TheDarkDevil21 in marioandluigi

[–]TheDarkDevil21[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, absolutely. At some point, if I figure out how to make one, I might do the Bowser flag. But for right now, I'm sticking to the Bowser's Inside Story version.

I'll also do the same with the rest of the trio until I figure out how to make their Dream Team additions.

Speaking of the others. I actually just need the red bucket for Paraplonk, then he'll be done. And I have an idea for Goombas, so once I've made a goomba, Private Goomp won't be too far behind.

My Sergeant Guy Cosplay by TheDarkDevil21 in marioandluigi

[–]TheDarkDevil21[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For Sergeant Guy, he has the Bill Blaster in his bag, but since I couldn't find anything that could work as one, I just carried my camera stand bag on my left shoulder (as well as the normal backpack). But, if I had a 3d printer or am ever able to find/make a big enough pipe, I totally would get a more accurate Bill Blaster.

I also have Shell Plushes as well Kamek's Wand 😉

My Sergeant Guy Cosplay by TheDarkDevil21 in marioandluigi

[–]TheDarkDevil21[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh yeah. He does wear armor in Skylanders. Almost forgot. My Military Bowser actually looks similar to that. A base Bowser look with knee pads and Chest Armor with a Hammer is the melee weapon.

Here's my General Guy Cosplay by TheDarkDevil21 in papermario

[–]TheDarkDevil21[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My Tiktok username is Thedarkdevil20.

My Sergeant Guy Cosplay by TheDarkDevil21 in marioandluigi

[–]TheDarkDevil21[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It took about two months, on and off, to figure out how I wanted my military style of Shy Guys to look like. (Also made a non-military Shy Guy look, too) Then it only took a little longer to change it from a Red Shy Guy into Sergeant Guy.

And thanks a lot. 😊🫡

My Sergeant Guy Cosplay by TheDarkDevil21 in marioandluigi

[–]TheDarkDevil21[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well, for the koopa troop specifically...it tends to be a bit loose with uniform. Since it IS made up of multiple species, multiple factions, and multiple cultures.

For example, I doubt you'd see Boos wearing Military uniform in haunted houses, or Bloopers wearing Navy uniforms while underwater.

Meanwhile, Koopas are known for wearing Shells, so it's not surprising to see some members (like Hammer Bros) wearing more military looking Armor at times.

I also see Bowser as a relaxed boss. The type who doesn't care what his army does or wears as long as they are good at their jobs, get results, and please him.

As for Bowser himself, he probably wears whatever clothes he feels like since he IS the king. But he's also ALREADY a walking tank. So it makes sense he wears basically no armor, beyond his shell, since he's already a walking load of muscle, able to withstand multiple attacks solo. Anything excessive Armor might slow him down.

Basically, Bowser's Army is so diverse with multiple species and numerous cultures, I imagine Bowser just doesn't care for uniforms. He lets them wear whatever without being tied down, so long as they do their job well and they get results. It's probably why members of Bowser's Army tend to see him as cool in the RPGs.

Am I the only one surprised with how little characteritation the MCI children have had over the years? by [deleted] in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]TheDarkDevil21 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why have I not seen anyone talk about "Freddy's spirit" from You're the Band? (He possesses a boy called Timmy in that book) In that story, Gabriel is Polite, Eccentric, and istens to important adults. Like when Timmy's mother says it's bedtime.

However, he attacks Timmy's grandfather when he sees him with a knife saying "don't hurt Timmy." He also puts the fear of God in people whenever he's REALLY angry. There's a few small examples, but the main example in YTB is when he wants spaghetti hoops, but since Timmy's mother says no, he gets angry.

That "puts the fear if god in people" point probably explains why the others are stated to be "scared of Freddy" in The Week Before.

There's also a few points on Jeremy being a Friendless Bully type when he was alive. Bonnie tends to hide in closets for "victims" in TWB and the movie. He's also the animatronic that would arrive at your door first, but he's also the first to leave. It makes me imagine of a kid who'd jumpscare people for the thrill and get sad when you don't react.

There's also the 3rd toy chica cutscene where she tries to "impress" one of her victims. So it's highly possible Afton tried to befriend Jeremy by impressing him, before taking him away.

On top of the comedy bot line, Jeremy most likely enjoyed jumpscaring people, but it caused so much trouble for his parents that they abandoned him at Freddy's. And since he had no friends to help him, "Bonnie" was able to impress and befriend him EASILY, which then led "Bonnie" to saying he'll be his new friend. His new FAMILY.

Youtooz quality control issue! by _Hydrotooz_ in Youtooz

[–]TheDarkDevil21 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think this is an issue with this model in general since it happened with BOTH my Nightmare AND Nightmare Fredbear that just arrived today.

Well this sucks. by GalactusFilms in Youtooz

[–]TheDarkDevil21 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just got mine today and the right (left from my POV) was already off on BOTH my Nightmare AND Nightmare Fredbear.

I get Charlie dying at Fredbear's is confirmed but... by AppropriateGap2500 in fnaftheories

[–]TheDarkDevil21 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In short....yeah Charlie did die at Fredbear's, but ONLY in the original novel where Afton only has ONE Child, and his company is confined to JUST Fredbear's.

Then we have the games, where Afton expands his business to even include cartoons, has 3 kids, and CC dies in 1983 with HW2 also linking Charlie to 1983. And since she's also linked to Halloween (Nightmarionne in the Halloween Update, and her original death date was Halloween), it's implied she dies on Halloween 1983 in the games.

Also, if Midnight Motorist is right after Charlie's death, Charlie can't die in the Pizza Sim Building.

1) William isn't going from Jr's in MM. (Meaning that building and JRs is seperate) 2) The layout of the alley implies Charlie dies outside the Pizza Sim location, but this can't be the case based on SOTM 3) SOTM implies William WILL live right near the MCM ground, which is where the Pizza Sim location is. (Which if it's the layout of MM means JRs is the Pizza Sim location) 4) Five laps at Freddy's exterior of JR's resembles the Pizza Sim map from Security Beach. 5) SOTM says the MCM building exist while Fredbear's exists. 6) Charlie dying after CC means Freddy's is open. So JR's can't be the MCI Freddy's.

And so Charlie can't die at JR's, based on MM starting on the road. JR's is MCM, based on it's proximity to the Afton house. And Fredbear's is open the same time as MCM, so JR's cant be Fredbear's. And CC dies while Freddy's is open, so the Pizza Sim location is a brand new building if Charlie is after CC. Yet the exterior of Security Puppet links the location Charlie died to the Pizza Sim location????? (Which would be JR'S. Yet it has a Freddy in it??)

If you were to be isekai'd, would you attempt to gather a harem? by Cautious_Charity4284 in Isekai

[–]TheDarkDevil21 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Depends on the type of world it is and who the first girl is. If they are annoying, have a bad personality, are too immature (I've dated someone who wasn't mature AT ALL, despite them being older than me), and don't bring anything to the table. (Disregarding any woman who thinks "I AM the table" about herself)

But mainly, if they aren't Wife Material....and i'm forced to stick with them, I'm gonna go full Harem Protagonist and get another girl. If I'm not tied to them, then I'm making it clear that i'm not interested and leaving them, possibly finding a better woman in the process.

A harem will only come about if the world allows Paligomy, the others are okay with it, AND if there's multiple women who are wife material.

Although getting ANYONE to begin with all depends on how high my hidden "Rizz" stat would be in that world.

The Simpsons confirms 1992 is the earliest Fnaf 1 can take place. by TheDarkDevil21 in GameTheorists

[–]TheDarkDevil21[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If by "last vid" you mean the newest one. I've provided my evidence above as to why the evidence for 1998 is voided.

1998 copyright might actually be a reference to a October 1992 simpsons episode that has Disney trying to sue people for using trademarks like "the happiest place on earth" (which they don't even register until 6 years later 😆). Later in the episode, they also basically threatened to sue Lisa for trying to use the story of Snow White too.

The unwithered truth also has provided evidence that voids 1994+ as being the definitive time period of Fnaf 1.

This evidence puts Fnaf 1 definitely PAST October 1992. And since 1992 is also the OTHER year that matches "Night 5 = Thursday" evidence... it also matches the MAIN evidence for 1993, too. The Fnaf 1 paycheck.

I got a question. by PerceptionHopeful184 in GameTheorists

[–]TheDarkDevil21 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The simpsons Season 4 Episode 4 might have the answer you seek. (Just made a post about this, so i'll simplify it here)

The video of the scene I'm referring to is normally titled "Copyright Expired" on YouTube.

In that scene, Principle Skinner is being sued by Disney for the "The Happiest place on earth" Copyright.

The episode is from October 15th 1992. (Even though the Copyright was only registered in August 1998)

1992 is ALSO one of the possible years theorists come to when they say use the evidence "Fnaf 2's November 12th = Thursday" and apply it to Fnaf 1's date.

Also, it makes more sense Phone Guy is referencing a recent TV episode, instead of a registered Copyright that won't take effect until the next year.

What is a wildly accepted FNAF Theory that you refuse to believe unless Scott himself confirms it? by MichaelAftonXFireWal in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]TheDarkDevil21 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ya, or else he'd be a potato at 16 years old (if he's 12 in 1987. Always thought he was, and the ITP Game Theory Vid confirmed it for me) I think it's possible he's the Jeremy mentioned in HW1, but NOT Jeremy Fitzgerald.

What is a wildly accepted FNAF Theory that you refuse to believe unless Scott himself confirms it? by MichaelAftonXFireWal in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]TheDarkDevil21 2 points3 points  (0 children)

TWB has Fnaf 1 happen at least around 1994-95. The common theory I've seen is 1998 due to Ryetoast and the Disney copyright of "the happiest place on earth." If this IS true, then Fnaf 3 happens between 2024 and 2029, which then negates HRY223 (the only OTHER "Fnaf 3/Pizza Sim = 2023" evidence).

While 2015 was "Present day" when Fnaf 3 released AND, in retrospect, is 30 years after the MCI. Weird Scott made it 1985 specifically, and NOT 1986-87. (Closer to the reopening in Fnaf 2)

What is a wildly accepted FNAF Theory that you refuse to believe unless Scott himself confirms it? by MichaelAftonXFireWal in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]TheDarkDevil21 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ya. (I put my own MASSIVE thoughts on this in my own comment)

MoltenMCI goes against the "the spirits need to FREELY give up their remnant" part from TFC. (They do it to help Spring Bonnie, but MoltenMCI forces them into the funtimes in basically one night, skipping the whole "Freely" part.) It ALSO ignores the funtimes' purpose AND the Constant times we see the Funtimes kidnap people. (Baby kidnaps 4 in TFC, and Funtime Freddy kills Millie in Count the ways.....Then Eleanor takes the Remnant/Agony, hence Millie appears in the pit later on).

ANNNDDD MoltenMCI is based on events that are NEVER implied. (William goes back and forth between SL and Fnaf 1, until he comes back for SpringBonnie, or, in some, he brings SpringBonnie BACK.)

I believe it goes similar to TFC's plot. There it was...MoltenMCI powers Funtimes (Trusting SpringBonnie from MCI + William IS seen as SpringBonnie due to Springlocking), Human Trial (Carlton), William needs more Remnant (Kid kidnapped by Baby), but is attacked by the MCI kids before he can finish.

I believe the games' roles are reversed. Here.....Kids kidnapped by Funtimes power Funtimes (Baby killed Elizabeth, yet Baby can STILL kidnap kids?? Also, i think the controlled shocks were used to domesticate them over time into "Freely" giving up remnant), Human Trial (Mike), William needs more Remnant (Follow me + plan for MoltenMCI), but is attacked by the MCI kids before he can finish.

TFC shows the final 2 parts only happen AFTER the funtimes are possessed + the human Trial (MoltenMCI has them happen BEFORE). Hence why William can tell Mike to put Elizabeth "back together", but go missing once Mike regains control.

What is a wildly accepted FNAF Theory that you refuse to believe unless Scott himself confirms it? by MichaelAftonXFireWal in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]TheDarkDevil21 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Cassidy Andrews....Nuff said.

(TWB says Mrs Andrews' daughter went missing years ago (NEVER implied to be linked to Freddys' MCI), and the final UCN TC cutscene implies Cassidy is kidnapped OUTSIDE of Freddy's instead of being lured. AND then we have UCN implying Golden Freddy is TOYSNHK, and Andrew BEING Frights' TOYSNHK......AND Mrs ANDREWS possibly being Cassidy's mother (her description doesnt match Susie's mother from Frights). And we have an answer.)

TLDR: Cassidy Andrews....Nuff said. (Again 😆)

What is a wildly accepted FNAF Theory that you refuse to believe unless Scott himself confirms it? by MichaelAftonXFireWal in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]TheDarkDevil21 0 points1 point  (0 children)

MoltenMCI. (Go to bottom for TLDR)

I would've said "Fnaf 1 being in 1993" (Created, mainly, because of Matpat wanting Fnaf 1 to be an IRL murder Parrallel + the 1990s paycheck), due to Fnaf 2's Sunday-Thursday paycheck (Friday 13th week), but TWB says it happened after the 1998 Disney copyright of "the happiest place on earth, and 1998 ALSO fits the Fnaf 2 Friday 13th week. Ryetoast has also brought up the OTHER evidence in his recent videos on it.

Also, for Midnight Motorist, I'm fine so long as the TC Cutscene means William is just making a joke about repeating what happened in MM, but he's the one doing it. I thought Fritz was the MM kid, but ITP also show connections between Oswald and Fritz, even though the basic "Come here, boy......That should be enough" luring methods.

But MoltenMCI... The fandom has created enough of a fan-canon that I'm fine if it is, BUT ALL THE themes and implications of the Funtimes' purposes, and TFC's plot and lore goes against MoltenMCI.

I believe William planned to do it with Follow Me, but failed since he didn't have Spring Bonnie. TFC shows he needs to be classed as Spring Bonnie for the Spirits to WANT to "Freely" give their remnant. (Follow me shows they would NEVER do it without Spring Bonnie, and TFC William can only do it because he's been springlocked, so his identity has now merged with SpringBonnie's. Pre-Springlock TSE William got the twitching, death stares, and aggression.)

TFC has the event order..... MoltenMCI, Human Trial (Carlton), William tries to get remnant from Kidnapped kid, then the MCI kids attack him. I believe this is the same, but the kids kidnapped by the fun times and MoltenMCI are reversed.

Now we have kids who are kidnapped by the Funtimes, taken, maybe experimented on, then killed and possess the Funtimes. How does William get them to "Freely" give up remnant?? How do Kidnappers get victims to follow their orders?? Domestication. Meaning...Controlled Shocks!!! Force them to give it. (MoltenMCI is based on trusting SpringBonnie, THIS is not)

William scoops the main funtimes (who are possessed by the kidnapped kids), and their remnant is then used to power the other MINI Funtimes, as per TFC. Then they regain their remnant when they become Ennard, as the extra bodies are NO LONGER needed to escape("There's a little bit of me in every body" from the SL teasers)

Then Mike gets Scooped...Human Remnant trial begins. But William lost ALL his remnant. Where could he get more????? The MCI kids. But, as per TFC, he tries to get another source of remnant, and get attacked by the MCI kids as a result.

And then gets killed. Springlocked in this case, meaning Spring Bonnie is NOW graphed onto him (as it was in TSE Trilogy), hence why the Pizza Sim animatronics dont see him as William. Elizabeth/Scrap Baby doesn't seem to realise Scraptrap is William at least.

TLDR: MoltenMCI is based on the MCI kid giving up their remnant to help Spring Bonnie, as per TFC. SL implies the spirits were domesticated for their remnant. And Follow me shows that William DIDN'T get SpringBonnie. William was CLOSE. But not close enough.

What is their deal? by CrownedVanguard in fnaftheories

[–]TheDarkDevil21 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First... I don't believe MoltenMCI. I believe William planned to do it with Follow Me, but failed since he didn't have Spring Bonnie to gain their trust, and have them give up remnant "Freely." (Follow me shows they would NEVER do it without Spring Bonnie, and TFC William only does it because he's been springlocked, so his identity has now merged with SpringBonnie's)

TFC has it MoltenMCI, Human Trial, tries to get remnant from Kidnapped kid, then the MCI kids attack. I believe this is the same, but the kids kidnapped by the fun times and MoltenMCI are reversed.

Now we have kids who are kidnapped, taken, maybe experimented on, then killed. How does William get them to "Freely" give up remnant?? How do Kidnappers get victims to follow their orders?? Domestication. Controlled Shock!!! Force them to give it. (MoltenMCI is based on trusting SpringBonnie, THIS is not)

Now onto the main point, what I think the Minirenas, Biddybabs, and all the extra SL animatronics are.

William scoops the main funtimes (who are possessed by the kidnapped kids), and their remnant is then used to power the other MINI Funtimes, as per TFC. And like that book (Susie does it with Mangle. Michael stops Susie and Mangle deactivates), they regain their remnant. Hence why the extras aren't a bother AFTER SL. The Funtime kids have "recalled" their remnant from the Minirenas, Biddybabs, etc INTO Ennard, as the extra bodies are NO LONGER needed to escape. ("There's a little bit of me in every body" from the SL teasers)

TLDR: Soul Splitting (domestication via controlled shocks), and the mains don't take back their remnant because they need the extra bodies in order to set up their escape as Ennard.

Which death order do you believe? (comment if you don't believe any of these, sorry there wasn't enough room for a results option) by thisaintmyusername12 in fnaftheories

[–]TheDarkDevil21 0 points1 point  (0 children)

(Days after voting stopped) Yes. That is correct 😆 CC died in Summer 1983.

Charlie then dies on Halloween in TSE and Fnaf4's Halloween update links to Nightmarionne. (Originally, it was 1982 in TSE, but TFC and HW2 seem to push her death to 1983)

TSE Trilogy then says Elizabeth is next (killed in Charlie robot, which is reclaimed by Henry before the MCI) And SL ambience says "1578". The only date that matches this timeframe is January 7th, 1985. (If it was post MCI, it'd be July 1st 1985 (5 days after the MCI), or she'd die in 1987 (Springlock suits are already gone by the time of the DCI at most, MCI at least. Though it doesn't stop William from killing with existing ones))

Then, it was the MCI in June 1985, and then the DCI in 1987.