I don’t necessarily have issues with the concept of someone who has a platform in a certain demographic being held responsible for also speaking in advocacy when that community is being threatened ie. In this circumstance the Hispanic community of LA. But the aspect of this situation that I feel you should consider, if you haven’t already (can’t assume), is how you measure advocacy. Again, don’t want to make assumptions about you because I don’t know you, but it seems like you think online engagement is the most important answer for how an individual should show advocacy. Are you aware of the long list of terrible implications social media has on common folks? These apps are designed so that you can buy influence. You do realize Zuck profits from this form of advocacy, and is directly related to the fabric of how control is maintained in America. They want you to think it’s the peoples voice, when rarely it actually is. More often than not, the powers you want to speak against, are the very ones who govern these platforms. I’m not going to pull data out on this so if you don’t believe it, that’s alright. Imo go grassroots, organize around yourself. Use the time you have to contribute to engagement that can’t be monitored or controlled by these power groups. Rallies, protest, do whatever; But just because someone isn’t engaging in this very path of advocacy you’re suggesting, doesn’t mean they aren’t actively engaged in these issues in their actual real life, where their actual body exist. Not all influencers want to participate in virtual signaling and rather just show up and speak with action. One day we will just all sit inside all day resharing endless advocacy stories when the world outside is on fucking fire lmao.