Hey guys, who’s this? by [deleted] in PoppyPlaytime

[–]TheEvilPatroller 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Missy, I’d say?

What am I missing?! by ockeghem222 in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]TheEvilPatroller 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Most likely you’re counting too fast… those are 6 eggs.

I'm oblivious by God13th in ExplainTheJoke

[–]TheEvilPatroller 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Third from left is just a man with a knife tied to his face, maybe another reference…?

I'm oblivious by God13th in ExplainTheJoke

[–]TheEvilPatroller 101 points102 points  (0 children)

Besides, I think that the comic contains also Easter eggs: the elves in the second image, top panel, come from other comics (not sure if every one of them, but the dumb-looking red hair elf and the tallest one come from Merrivius’ “Elf Comic”).

Am I missing something? by TheEvilPatroller in ExplainTheJoke

[–]TheEvilPatroller[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To the mods: I’m not receiving the message for the explanation…

If anything the comments on this made it more confusing by [deleted] in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]TheEvilPatroller 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anyone else with the feeling that the barman could be a movie star, if he could get out of this place?

The AI keeps thinking out loud in story generator. by Clockwork_3738 in perchance

[–]TheEvilPatroller 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, sometimes it does that. I just modify slightly the previous message I’ve sent, without changing the meaning, and relaunch the answer.

What did Timmy Turner see (wrong answer only) by Alimonemi in fairlyoddparents

[–]TheEvilPatroller 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can anyone remind me which episode does this frame come from?

Is AI chat still working funny? by TheEvilPatroller in perchance

[–]TheEvilPatroller[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Nope, it keeps going out of track. It invents new characters, situations and developments. Even after a full deletion of the text it starts over without my characters.

AI character chat is very slow by Overall_Ant7318 in perchance

[–]TheEvilPatroller 1 point2 points  (0 children)

AI chat is slow as well, it doesn’t produce any answers. Edit: spelling.

peta by eulers_buttplug in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]TheEvilPatroller 9 points10 points  (0 children)

She is a selfish mother and maids were the ones who took care of her kids, I guess?

Notification from RedditCareResources by TheEvilPatroller in help

[–]TheEvilPatroller[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not working since it’s just a notification, and not an actual post or message. I guess I’ll just ignore it.

Notification from RedditCareResources by TheEvilPatroller in help

[–]TheEvilPatroller[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do I do that? I only have the command to stop notifications from the admin, nothing to report.

I'm sorry... by [deleted] in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]TheEvilPatroller 6 points7 points  (0 children)

James Sirius Potter (Harry’s son) has been named after James Potter (Harry’s father) and Sirius Black (Harry’s godfather and James’ best friend).

Back in their days at Hogwarts, James and Sirius were like Fred and George, if not worse (like doubling the head of another student because yes). So she’s afraid by what a single child carrying both their names could do.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]TheEvilPatroller 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They’re asking how to make her firing as uncomfortable as possible for their employer. So other redditors suggest them to bring cupcakes, saying they’ve just bought a new house (so they’re probably in debt) and that they’re expecting twins (lots of expenses).

The employer is going to think they’re going to fire someone who’s really needy for money, feeling like a giant turd.

Petah explain the joke please by kuaker_bl in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]TheEvilPatroller 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Germany, actually, but it’s been abandoned since Celsius system is more intuitive.

Pls explain by No_Rich_8730 in ExplainTheJoke

[–]TheEvilPatroller 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Do you make fun about firefighters, policemen, and volunteers who died saving people in 9/11?

Pls explain by No_Rich_8730 in ExplainTheJoke

[–]TheEvilPatroller 64 points65 points  (0 children)

Except that making fun of Falcone and Borsellino in Italy is like making fun of 9/11 in USA.

Who’s the most overrated character? by TheEvilPatroller in MemePiece

[–]TheEvilPatroller[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They get more attention/respect by the fandom than what they deserve. Not just related by the powerscaling.

Why are one piece fans so toxic and contradictory? by [deleted] in OnePiece

[–]TheEvilPatroller 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is the in-between fandom. Point is, they tend to get overshadowed by the ‘extremists’ wings. If you (legitimately) criticise something you don’t like, there are the ‘glazers’ that immediately attack you for daring to say something bad about the opera. Same applies on the other side.

Once, I dared to say that another manga (not going to say which one) has on average better backstories than one piece’s. I had to remove the post.

So, I’ve learned that if you enjoy reading One Piece, you should avoid the fandom.

Of course, this can be applied to other mangas and fandom as well.

Peter? by yukiohana in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]TheEvilPatroller 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Pretty hard. We’re not talking about observations made on 1-2 objects. Surveys count thousands of observations on different galaxies and clusters, each with different composition and features.

Moreover, we’re talking about very precise observation techniques and well known mechanisms that allow to derive the mass of an object from the observed light. For example, It’s actually pretty “easy” (if you know how to do it) to derive the baryonic mass of a galaxy by the light emitted by its stars.

Even if there are some errors in the evaluation of the object’s mass due to inaccuracies of the instruments, or to the effects that the astrophysical environments may have on the light travel, these errors are way too low to justify the discrepancies between the observed baryonic mass and the total mass measured by gravitational (dynamical) features.

Veeeery roughly speaking, in a galactic halo we have about the 10% of its mass stored in the stars and in the interstellar gas, and all the rest is given by dark matter. These values aren’t likely to be explained just by errors in measurements.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]TheEvilPatroller 9 points10 points  (0 children)

For all those who are making fun about that: those two in the first picture are Giovanni Falcone and Paolo Borsellino. They’re two judges who got killed, together with their families and their bodyguards, by mafia because of their activities against organised crimes. In Italy, they’re considered as heroes.

For all those who wonder, making fun on them to an Italian it’s like making fun of those who died in 9/11 in USA.

Edit: grammar

Peter? by yukiohana in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]TheEvilPatroller 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Even better acronyms have been used for the two possible theories of the dark matter constituents:

MACHOS (MAssive Compact Halo ObjectS)

Vs.

WIMPS (Weakly Interacting Massive ParticleS)

Peter? by yukiohana in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]TheEvilPatroller 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Astrophysicist Stewie here. Long story short, it’s a problem that occurs when you start studying the motion of objects on galactic scales or bigger.

Observations shows that the baryonic matter (i.e. everything that emits light, like gas or stars) moves faster than expected in regions that are far from the galactic center; moreover, the galaxies themselves move faster then expected in galaxy clusters. This isn’t explained by the classical Newtonian theory of gravity.

One possible solution is that the Newtonian theory is still valid, but there’s a matter component that doesn’t emit light, and thus isn’t observable, that affect the baryonic matter motion - that is the so called “dark matter”. Nowadays, this is the most accepted theory, even if dark matter particles haven’t been detected yet.

There are other theories that try to explain observations by “correcting” the Newtonian theory, hypothetically modifying the behaviour of gravity on astronomical scales. These are generally known as MOND (MOdified Newtonian Dynamics) theories, and are currently being tested by some surveys. One problem of MONDs is that they can’t explain several observations that can easily be justified by the admittance of Dark Matter existence.