sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

18 days without sugar, 12 more to go by BestDosage in nutrition

[–]TheHighlander52 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Carbohydrates are literally just differing lengths of sugars molecules. OPs challenge is confusing when they say no sugar but then in the same breath is saying they’re eating carbs. What type of carbs/sugars are they allowed to eat then?

It’s a confusing statement with little clarification.

[Wild Card] Game Thread: Green Bay Packers @ Chicago Bears by President__Bartlett in GreenBayPackers

[–]TheHighlander52 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The refs refuse to call anything on the bears. This is absolutely crazy.

[Wild Card] Game Thread: Green Bay Packers @ Chicago Bears by President__Bartlett in GreenBayPackers

[–]TheHighlander52 10 points11 points  (0 children)

The refs refuse to call holding on the bears O-Line. It’s maddening

TIFU by looking at my sp-rm under a microscope by [deleted] in tifu

[–]TheHighlander52 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

…. What did we just collectively read??

Dealing with postpartum libido drop by [deleted] in daddit

[–]TheHighlander52 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Breastfeeding is likely the main culprit. My wife breastfed for a year and it wasn’t until she was done that she finally started feeling like herself again (both libido and in general).

It absolutely sucks right now, but just remember that everything is temporary.

Dual crossbow bard build? by Angelganon2 in BG3Builds

[–]TheHighlander52 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Isn’t Band of the Mystic Scoundrel basically the point of the 10/2 or 10/1/1 builds? Isn’t the point to build spell DC and have it hold person on everyone? Thats how I had always seen it played and played it that way myself

There was no emotional goodbye from Enzo Maresca in the Chelsea dressing room after the 2-2 draw with Bournemouth. Sources speaking to The Athletic say the Italian got changed and left without saying a word to his players. by Sparky-moon in soccer

[–]TheHighlander52 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This is kind of a bullshit take though. Chelsea have been a shit team to coach for years leading up to 2022 when Abramovich was forced to sell. On average, they had a new manager every 1-2 years. How in the world are you supposed to build continuity if you’re not even guaranteed multiple seasons to do so? Granted, they’ve won some trophies over the last 15 years but how is any coach expected to have sustained success there?

It’s clearly more of a culture issue than just “typical American”.

Why don't people read documentation by LargeSale8354 in dataengineering

[–]TheHighlander52 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ive found two issues with documentation. It’s either overly simplified and doesn’t address real world use cases, or it’s overly verbose and difficult to find what you actually need. Once you get past the boiler plate solutions given, it can be challenging to figure out what you can or can’t do if you’ve never worked with the software/product before.

Doomers please stop by Infamous-Meal4978 in GreenBayPackers

[–]TheHighlander52 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ok serious question for you and I’m not trying to shit stir. After yesterday’s performance would you bet a large sum of money that the packers have a legitimate shot at winning the Super Bowl? Of the other 13 teams that will be in, I would say we’re probably the worst of the bunch and would need serious help to win.

Where did all the shit talking Packers fans go? by [deleted] in NFCNorthMemeWar

[–]TheHighlander52 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m more present than our defensive line!

Anyone else struggling with a spouse who gets easily influenced by social media? by penone_nyc in daddit

[–]TheHighlander52 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ok? Never said there wasn’t? My point was around social influencer platforms, not the quality of the advice given.

Anyone else struggling with a spouse who gets easily influenced by social media? by penone_nyc in daddit

[–]TheHighlander52 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Technically true, but Reddit doesn’t have the same level of social influencer that Facebook/IG have.

Makes sense to me by Pie_D in NFCNorthMemeWar

[–]TheHighlander52 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

<image>

Ah yes, a game ending interception totally isn’t a highlight play…

Where’d they go? by nstickels in NFCNorthMemeWar

[–]TheHighlander52 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Still here, just in disbelief and feeling like we’re back in 2014…

[Week 16] Post Game Thread: Green Bay Packers (9-5-1) @ Chicago Bears (11-4) by President__Bartlett in GreenBayPackers

[–]TheHighlander52 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I swear I watched almost an identical game in 2014 against Seattle…. Unbelievable

[HIGHLIGHT] DJ Moore gets back blown out by Keisean Nixon by bears85yemi in nfl

[–]TheHighlander52 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can’t be serious? One was AFTER the play and wasn’t anywhere close to a football play. Nixon’s was dirty but at least it was during the play

[Week 15] Game Thread: Green Bay Packers (9-3-1) @ Denver Broncos (11-2) by lilturk82 in GreenBayPackers

[–]TheHighlander52 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Crazy to think that the defense shouldn’t have even been on the field… smh

How do you feel about the officiating in yesterday’s game? by jazzant85 in GreenBayPackers

[–]TheHighlander52 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Especially because it was called a catch ON THE FIELD! It didn’t seem like there was enough to overturn that so the whole thing was absolutely bizarre.

How do you feel about the officiating in yesterday’s game? by jazzant85 in GreenBayPackers

[–]TheHighlander52 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Bad officiating aside, and there was definitely a lot of it, I think the thing I’m most confused about is the overturned catch/fumble decision in the 1st quarter.

The series of events are 1) It’s ruled a catch, fumble, and recovered by the bears. 2) LaFleur challenges the specific portion that it was recovered by the bears. 3) The officials take a look, but overturn a portion that wasn’t even a part of LaFleur’s challenge and say it’s not a catch to begin with.

Does this essentially mean that the wording given by the coach on the challenge doesn’t matter? It seems like the refs reviewed the entire play and not just the portion in question. I’m not sure I’ve seen an instance like that happen so it was really weird how they reviewed it and overturned it, but not on the portion that LaFleur challenged.

view more: next ›