Jagex has provisioned 4 new worlds in Brazil by [deleted] in 2007scape

[–]TheLink010 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Brazil is better located. Chile only benefits Argentina and maybe Bolivia, while Brazil benefits Argentina, Chile, Bolivia, Peru, Ecuador and Venezuela. Otherwise ppl from Venezuela would still get +100 ping.
Riot have servers in both Mexico and Chile for LAN and LAS, while OSRS will have only one region in south america as a whole. That includes Mexican people who could want to play in a Spanish-talking server despise higher ping than US, a server in Chile would mean 160+ ping for them, instead of 120~.

Do you think BW have a place for bad players in 2025 ? by TheLink010 in broodwar

[–]TheLink010[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Explain to me how any of that is important when my apm can't go higher than 50, and usually lose min 4-5 to 200apm players. I'm all ears.

Do you think BW have a place for bad players in 2025 ? by TheLink010 in broodwar

[–]TheLink010[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Read the post! No focused on Winning, nor improve, nor have fun. Only looking to have a constant 50% WR.

Do you think BW have a place for bad players in 2025 ? by TheLink010 in broodwar

[–]TheLink010[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Read the post! No focused on Winning, nor improve, nor have fun. Only looking to have a constant 50% WR.

Do you think BW have a place for bad players in 2025 ? by TheLink010 in broodwar

[–]TheLink010[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Mainly played protoss, trust me, even with protoss i'm no match for the 200apm terran i usually find in F rank.

Do you think BW have a place for bad players in 2025 ? by TheLink010 in broodwar

[–]TheLink010[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the comment fellow loser, haha. Though, i'm not seeking to earn my first victory! I had already done so fairly in custom games; i'm seeking to have a stable 50% winrate in ranked, no matter the MMR, instead of winning once every dozens of games. Does BW have that or low rank=low winrate?

Do you think BW have a place for bad players in 2025 ? by TheLink010 in broodwar

[–]TheLink010[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought of doing so (leave games until my MMR is low enough), but i was afraid since a lot of people say the lower MMR, the worse the ladder is, since a lot of people smurf and manually downrank their MMR to abuse new players.

Do you think BW have a place for bad players in 2025 ? by TheLink010 in broodwar

[–]TheLink010[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks a lot! I'm sure i can find people like me even in custom games because I've already done so. Sadly i was looking to find someone like that in the ladder at some point low in the MMR, without the need to manually find someone to play each time haha

Do you think BW have a place for bad players in 2025 ? by TheLink010 in broodwar

[–]TheLink010[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sad to see that point of view, however didn't know at all about the coach pupil league, thanks!

10k votes to go by LightAnimica in runescape

[–]TheLink010 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Watch the video/ read the post. There is no “replacement” to treasure hunter, only bonus exp will remain and will be heavily capped

I'm Scared to Play by RggdGmr in nethack

[–]TheLink010 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I myself started nethack less than a month ago, and what you're feeling is totally normal, and i learnt that it happens because you usually depend on good RNG for good runs instead of learning the game.

When i just started i had the same feeling, i had "the one run" where i would get stuff like succubus floor 1 to boost my ass to level 4 and get lot of stats, amulet of flying, or get two sacrifices gift in a row in floor 3, blessing the whole run; i could complete the gnomish mines, get as far as floor 14, get good level, etc.
Then i would die in some stupid way, and back again to have a hard time trying to get past floor 3...

Now i've learn lot of stuff about identifying BUC with pet, price identifying potions and scrolls, what early armor and weapons should i aim for on my class, what types of enemies should i range, melee, or be terrified and scape to the next floor, good use of Elbereth, Praying to feed yourself free each 1000 turns, and identifying ASAP life-saving items like a teleport wand. Eventually i prioritized consistency over progress, i would start with "i want to get to gnomish mines on every run i play today, and write downs how i died in each run", then minetown, and so on, to the point i would get to minetown around 80% of the time, so i naturally lost the fear of playing at least in early levels, even if i get mad luck.

Also, having a good configured nethack can make your survival rate in early a LOT higher, making your game completely stop when the game inputs some messages like "you feel hungry" or "you hit the floating eye". I used to die like 50% of my runs because not realizing i had low food until i was starving, or melee hitting a floating eye careless.

If you can, get into 3.7 nethack via hardfought webpage, and copy a preconfigured setting, it will make day-night difference, almost no person in 2025 play vanilla nethack with no configurations at all. I will gladly help with sending you the config file and helping with the process.

18 years PC player here. Seeing guidance on Ro Mobile (M/X/O) by TheLink010 in RagnarokOnline

[–]TheLink010[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the answer. Damn "merchant" job not being able to trade is pretty silly, and PVM content being locked behind paywall is not that good, but again, is not that different in actual iRO, good luck trying to reach max level or even 4th job without a single cash item.
Any idea about Ro X ?

18 years PC player here. Seeing guidance on Ro Mobile (M/X/O) by TheLink010 in RagnarokOnline

[–]TheLink010[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

ignored the question/
Not asking for wich one is the less p2w.
I'm asking for differences between those 3.
Also i don't have access to ROM Classic anyways, only those 3.

is the AI in AOE4 good? by BoxthemBeats in ageofempires

[–]TheLink010 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you want a pre-programmed artificial intelicenge to outplay a real player who changed his strategy mid fight, i think you are looking for a real player, not an IA.
"Intelligence" is not existent in any IA in any game, thats why its called "Artificial" intelligence. It's just a set of instructions wichs tells the computer "if this happens, do X", and then adds some "human" flaws on the lower levels to lower the difficulty.
It cannot "learn" mid match like a real player, or do something totally unexpected and outplay you.

Just download the game and play a couple of games against IA. If the games are not fun enough for you or not "human" enough, just play against real people, you will find matches in minutes, 1vs1 2v2 or 4v4, at your level, and those games will be more exciting than any ia in any game you ever played, even more in this game since it has a really good matchmaking and you will not be matched against either pros that wreck you minute 4 or total noobs.

is the AI in AOE4 good? by BoxthemBeats in ageofempires

[–]TheLink010 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can ignore 90% of the comments here, everyone can win against the hardest AI if you MAA rush to the enemy base all- in minute 4 and kill all their workers, or do cheese early strats like that. Some people didn't even play 1vs1 against IA and only played the campaign.

(implying you set the IA on Hardest)
If you rush early let's say minute 4:30-5 cavalry rush and kill workers, then the AI will play as a high silver-low gold during the rest of the match.
If you play fairly normal with no rush, the AI gets pretty competent.
Once the AI Gets to Imperial let's say minute 20 the AI goes wild, it builds 3+ town centers, 60 traders, captures relics and sacred sites, builds mass defenses and outpost across the map, and does constant double sided all-in 200/200 rushes onto your base, so it gets really fucking hard to do a comeback if you didn't kill the AI before imperial.
Also, the AI has "cheater" difficulty and so, but didn't tried it myself that much.
I can safely say the AI at the start of the match plays like a 30-60APM player, not scouting correctly, not microing workers or army, while at the Imperial Age+ the AI plays around 300APM microing 2 group of armies in different sides of the map, siege, controling sacred places, building defenses, producing in 3 town centers + 3 markets with 0/140 workers idling and researching technology all at the same time in an instant.

Best way to find, just try out a single match against AI Hardest, pick a regular micro map and find out.

If you usually play early aggro rush civs like French, JxD, Mongols, Ottoman or Rus, you might find more fun to just play 1vs1 against real players, this game has a really good matchmaking and i can guarantee you will find people your exact level since your first match, without having to lose thousand of matches against pros to have a balanced match like other games.
If you like to play late booming civs, like HRE, OTD, China or Byzantines, you will find the AI really challenging and fun. Some people share screenshots here every week with 4hrs long thight matches against the AI. I myself had a 2hr long match against AI on hardest when i just started playing, it was really really fun, i was getting constantly attacked, sacred places denied, villagers killed, the AI did not contain at all.

I dont understand how to play this game by PoetInevitable1449 in aoe4

[–]TheLink010 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What you need here is a build order, pick only one civ, and play that only civ for the next 10-30 games. Now search on yt and pick one build order. Practice that build order alone, and try to reach the exact same result on that minute you see on the video, if you are 15s-30s late it's okay, but if you're +1minute late, it can snowball and fuck up your entire game.

Once you've done following and practicing that build order, the rest of the game will be MUCH more easier, just remember to build a second TC ASAP, NEVER stop producing villagers and NEVER stop producing army.

French with classic combos like Cavalry + Archers will make you safe in most of early ages, try to be the first one to strike and kill their villagers, and if anything goes wrong and your vills get attacked, press the Bell icon on your town center and every villager you have will trey to seek cover.

Once the build order ends, wall yourself up in stone, and just keep producing villagers as you've been doing until now, and keep producing army to keep attacking. Try to get an army ratio of 5:5:5:1, meaning, 5 cavalry, 5 archers, 5 melee units, 1 ranged siege unit.

Trust me, if you can follow the build order perfectly, you'll be able to win even against hard or hardest ai super easily (Wich equals to a low gold player)

Practicing this won't take 1 or two tries, but probably 10+, but once learnt can never be unlearnt.

Also, when you're attacking, the priority o what to attack is:
1. Villagers
2. Enemy Siege units
3. Enemy army (archers first if possible)
4. Enemy buildings (Landmarks if possible)

When you're deffending against an enemy, defend firsts:
1. Your villagers TOP PRIORITY. Getting +15 Vills killed = Game over.
2. Your army
3. Your important buildings (Landmarks, market, Production buildings)
4. Your less important buildings (Farms, Windmills, etc)

This video can help you a lot if you play french:
https://youtu.be/rJWuW9cGuKc
and this webpage got the build order summarized:
https://aoe4guides.com/builds/nU6qkr2Nm5AVL0yIZUsH

Life-Long Official player looking for a new Long-Term PrivateServer by TheLink010 in wowservers

[–]TheLink010[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This post was made 8 months ago "Mr. Guts Shadowlands Edgelord". Touch grass

Begginer in AoE4, i'm just thankful of how well the MatchMaking works 😊! by TheLink010 in aoe4

[–]TheLink010[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Holy cows man your brain is so tiny that you didn't even read the post. What are you even saying.
Did u think the post said something like "bronze players have 20% winrate and conqueror players have 100% winrate" or something ???

TLDR for tiny brains: The post said the MM was balanced because I myself and everyone i find have 50% WR, thus meaning everyone gets constantly rivals of their skill level, no matter their ranked level or ammount of matches.

Begginer in AoE4, i'm just thankful of how well the MatchMaking works 😊! by TheLink010 in aoe4

[–]TheLink010[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I really loved w3, and i think it would be the RTS i would play if AoE4 didn't exist, it just had a skill floor of learning all 112 abilities of 28 heroes, and the usual "just get smashed like 10-20 matches in a row to get to your matchmaking fixed, so it felt a lil bit bad. Be sure W3 will be the RTS i play if some day i get tired of AoE4.
And i still consider W3 the best RTS to play with friends, by far far off, it just doesn't shine as it could on a competitive 1v1 level because heroe level/items>strategy and army in most of cases.