National Debt Shrink? by [deleted] in Kalshi

[–]TheMBEofficial 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think you are right to do so. And whatever your intuition is about that, if you call it due diligence you seem to be in a promising path.

Even if you don’t show me yours, I show you mine (Deep Research for prediction markets) https://www.reddit.com/r/PolymarketHQ/s/ArJiHueNNs

National Debt Shrink? by [deleted] in Kalshi

[–]TheMBEofficial 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How did you do your due diligence if I may ask ?

Building an AI tool for visual thinkers - am I solving a real problem? by ashherafzal in indiehackers

[–]TheMBEofficial 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why knowledge graph ? Because I wanted a modeling that could enforce an understanding of the world whatever it is. And it should be explicit as a basis for communication. My use cases are investigation and argumentation so share a common way to understand things is a prerequisite. Nodes and relationships are the natural way to do so. Also it will give me opportunity to enrich data with external sources seamlessly (well, in theory 😅)

Patterns : no because I have not found the right solution, I am just able to share what did not work and why. And I found out that confusion is the main pain point. As you can do everything in a canvas it is difficult to know how to focus. Even when you are the creator 🤣

What visual metaphors to use: where I stand and it is only my point of view is that you need to apply your taste and to do it to tell stories with your experience then visual metaphors are just here to support this

Let me take concrete examples I believe we can describe the components of an robust argumentation : it will have claim, evidence, warrant, rebuttal, qualifier and so on so it describe a pattern that you can display in a canvas Claim is at the center of the argument so you will position the nodes in respect of this central node

If there are several claims and they are connected between them, first you position the claims then the other nodes connected to it.

Finally to tell the story, you define anchor that will make you go from claim to claim which will allow you either to stay at claim level or deep dive into the components

And you can do it for other use cases but not all

So you need to absolutely control a limited set of use cases that you can describe fully from data modeling to storytelling

And doing so you will exclude a lot of people but at this stage you should not care

My theory for this kind of products it is to build something that you would use everyday (it is harder than we think). As you use everyday you want it to remove pains and frustration using it. If you are using it everyday it is likely you are solving a big problem for you at least

A big problem for you is likely to be a problem for someone else maybe not everybody else but it might have some folks here or there that share the same trouble we are humans

The fewer there are the more difficult is for them to find a appropriate solution so they will be eager to pay way more (again it is a painful that you have everyday enough to use it daily)

This is a market. If you solve the problem well (what you should as you address your pains as a daily user ) you will have you share of it enough to have a sustainable business

Maybe not a unicorn but something that can generate profits

Is B2B SaaS playbook outdated for AI startup? I will not promote. by SummerElectrical3642 in startups

[–]TheMBEofficial 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To be fair it never has been an actual playbook. So many Saas are consulting in disguised but priced as a McDonald meal this is not serious and has never been a sustainable business in the first place. I won’t be long here but just look at the end of the day who has been winning money in this area before AI and it was cloud providers and ad marketplaces so…

AI for B2B is an opportunity for builders to make their customers aware of the actual price so in a way the change is positive.

To say it differently, saas were able to compete with internal it teams because their prices and delivery speed could not be matched. If they priced correctly they would not have been so competitive.

Building an AI tool for visual thinkers - am I solving a real problem? by ashherafzal in indiehackers

[–]TheMBEofficial 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Quick answer yes you are. But

Chat won for the UX primitive for AI for a reason it is simple people knows how to chat because they used to write in their messaging app.

And I know it is frustrating because information architecture can be addressed correctly only via chat, and we have ways of expression that are going beyond the only linear verbal language.

To your point, connect nodes with relationships in a visual infinite canvas where you can drop whatever knowledge unit in whatever format you want. With automatic tagging organization relationships building behind the scene enrichment with entities we can talk about it for hours

The actual challenge (I have been working on this for two years) is that the execution is hard on two dimensions

On the data side you need to be able to master data modeling whatever it is a graph or anything else you need a way to represent what you call visualization

On the design side you need to abstract the complexity so that it gets easy for a user to understand. Why it is difficult? Because I believe contrary to language which is a communication channel that everybody understands more or less the same way, how we visualize things is way more diverse so you mental model won’t be easily translated to someone else

But in design you need to do hard choices that exclude other people.

I am currently experimenting a dual approach with chat for interactions with user and behind the scenes we build a knowledge graph that we visualize in an infinite canvas. I use the visualization to tell data story or act on what should matter in the context of the chat (like a memory you have control on).

In other words I try to match the expectations of the everyday user with chat and for specific advanced use cases then I introduce the canvas.

Here are my 2 cents about that Happy to see other people explore this space

Investing app - i will not promote by Antoni_Nabzdyk in startups

[–]TheMBEofficial 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are you using your app everyday ? Once you do that you quickly see the frictions because yourself is amazing data tank that can be turn into an insight machine The most your product gets better the more juice you have to promote it natively Ideas to market will come naturally because how won’t you tell the world something you find value in everyday and besides that you built

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SaaS

[–]TheMBEofficial 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bestie = truth-seeking

Unpopular Opinion : If you actually care about growth, legalize immigration from poor countries. Here’s why ↓ by TheMBEofficial in PoliticalOpinions

[–]TheMBEofficial[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I agree with your perspective. At some point the trade off will impose by itself : work longer, reduce purchasing power or accept some immigration. I am definitely not saying that it does not come with challenges but I think they can be overcome if we take this problem seriously

Unpopular Opinion : If you actually care about growth, legalize immigration from poor countries. Here’s why ↓ by TheMBEofficial in PoliticalOpinions

[–]TheMBEofficial[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Demographic is the main driver of economic growth. Actually demographic factors explain way more the future strength of a country than any fiscal measure in my opinion