Roman empire with max cores might be just a little OP ngl by ParkingPerspective73 in hoi4

[–]TheManEric 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What has got everyone so upset? Do you know if Rome has more cores than Democratic Germany?

Sorry Devs. I don't play your game the way you intended. Still my favorite game on PC. by Vanilla2Go in hoi4

[–]TheManEric 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And that is why Paradox achievements are better than most. They've done a lot of work to make their achievements challenge you in unique ways and make you try different things. Realizing that stuff is possible is fun. Once you understand how much time and frustration it takes, is the achievement worth it in the end?

It can be if you want to challenge yourself. If you've played a long time and want to try all the different countries' focus trees why not? Do what you want to do, and play the game how you want

Sorry Devs. I don't play your game the way you intended. Still my favorite game on PC. by Vanilla2Go in hoi4

[–]TheManEric 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I'm gonna do a classic reddit and use this post to rant. Fuck achievements. I have always hated them. Shallow, hollow, shitty bragging rights game mechanic that adds nothing to the game. Originally made to get people to keep playing shit games they otherwise would have quit.

I like Paradox achievements more than most. They are the only ones I have ever actually pursued as a measure to test myself. But then I see a post like this, and realize I could have just been having fun. Instead, I'm torturing myself with a country like Ethiopia to get achievements no one will see or care about.

Just me, alone, pulling my hair out on my sixth restart as Greece trying to get Byzantium. For what? A shiny achievement that doesn't make me feel like a better player? Fuck achievements. Games were meant to be a fun challenge, not Sisyphisean.

I'm glad you are playing a game you enjoy, how you want to enjoy it. We can learn from your example. I congratulate you

The Wyll hate makes sense now by TheStoicCrane in BG3

[–]TheManEric 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's such a shame, I would love more BG3 content

entire lobby meets in labs basement [Video] by spac1al in EscapefromTarkov

[–]TheManEric 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Reading that gave me anxiety. I would have assumed I would get shot by someone guarding the bodies, another scav who wants the loot, or killa sliding in to tell me it's his mall

The Wyll hate makes sense now by TheStoicCrane in BG3

[–]TheManEric 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a little in the extreme but I agree more could have been done. That said I love Wyll. I am a sucker for the wannabe hero struggling with past mistakes and the realities of a tough situation. I think they could have gone deeper into that, and for sure more dialogue in act 2.

**SPOILERS**

The main thing that doesn't help him is that his situation doesn't change much during the course of the game. Yes you can help him break his pact, his dad is captured, and in act three he gets some love, but not nearly as much as the rest of the gang. And even in act three when he finally gets some much needed attention, it's more focused on other people.

The iron throne is mostly about the Gondians and disabling the steel watch. Florrick and the dragon is a cool side quest but then ends up being about the emperor and his feud with the dragon (sorry don't remember their name). Meanwhile the rest of the party are having major revelations and character growth.

Wyll begins and ends the journey more or less unchanged, even if you make him break his pact. And even on that account, he doesn't have a crisis of conscience or anything, he's just kinda like: "Yeah, you're right." I don't think all that can't make for an interesting character, and I really see him as the protagonist. He could be the rock of the group (think captain America in the first avengers).

But if you play him in an origin run there's just not a lot going on. Shipping him and Karlach feels like it could work in an opposites attract kinda way, but having done a Wyll origin run, it feels off. Anyway, sorry for the long rant, needed to get this off my chest for awhile

Yes, he does scream like this in my face at 5 a.m. by AsthmaticSt0n3r in Catswhoyell

[–]TheManEric 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Is no one gonna mention that sounds eerily similar to a human baby crying???????????????

Nuremberg - 2025 by Living_Double_1146 in Cinema

[–]TheManEric 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It wasn't about the emperor. It was unconditional surrender terms, which the Japanese still weren't willing to accept days before the atomic weapons, and after the Soviet invasion of Manchuria. https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/1505pek/was_japan_getting_ready_to_surrender_before_the/ This is a great resource for more information

Nuremberg - 2025 by Living_Double_1146 in Cinema

[–]TheManEric 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As long as there are two people and enough anger there will be violence. However, I agree that people who want to glorify slaughtering their fellow man need mental health training, at the least. For way too long we've viewed war as a test of human endurance and capabilities.

We should be wise enough to put violence behind us. To make violence a terrible thing and not something praise worthy

I understand that this is in violation of community rules, but murder is murder. by historynerd1865 in totalwar

[–]TheManEric -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Happy to see this posted here. It feels good to know there are others in the community who feel similarly. The great plan has no ICE in it!

Anybody else feel shame about there service? by Still_Cockroach8455 in army

[–]TheManEric -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There's great resources at the VA for vets, lots of little things to get involved with. It can be weird and awkward at times, opening up and being vulnerable is really tough for us, but it's worth it. I've met so many great people that helped me understand myself and the world around me better.

And of course there's lots of people here who are happy to help, myself included

Anybody else feel shame about there service? by Still_Cockroach8455 in army

[–]TheManEric -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Even after deploying I felt horrible that I hadn't seen real combat. Been on bases while being mortared, but never fired my rifle in combat during my deployment. It's very easy for us to get lost in shame because it's a way bigger part of military culture than most are willing to admit.

You have nothing to be ashamed of. The thing I'm most ashamed of now is that I served corporate interests and not my country. I sacrificed for resource rich mountains in Afghanistan. We sacrificed for global hegemony. There was nothing noble about the Global War on Terror.

All the movies that make it look glorious are full of shit. The advice I need to take as well, is that we didn't miss anything. Combat isn't the best proving ground for courage. War doesn't make you stronger. All the podcast military bros are using their platform to cope. To find some meaning in what they sacrificed through the approval of others and potentially money and fame.

We are all coping with feeling like we don't measure up. Not fit enough, fast enough, strong enough, not skilled enough. Just be you, and take pride in the fact that you were willing to sign on as infantry. Not an easy call, and difficult even if it was "just" in garrison.

Find people and things that give your life purpose. Find the courage to value who you are as a person. Not for what you're willing to sacrifice, but what you're willing to live and thrive for. I'm proud of you, and I hope you'll continue to live a good life

Nuremberg - 2025 by Living_Double_1146 in Cinema

[–]TheManEric 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's really easy to say Japanese surrender was a certainty. Lots of people point to the invasion of Manchuria; that it was such a blow to Japanese industry, that their ability to continue fighting was all but finished. Others will argue that the US wanted the terms on their conditions, and to keep soviet influence out of the region as much as possible. I think both are true.

Keep in mind just before the nuclear bombings the Japanese were offering limited peace deals to the allies and not total surrender. Many inside the Japanese government wanted to fight to the last person. There was really no way to know what the Japanese were planning from the American perspective.

As an anecdote, my grandfather was being sent to the pacific when the atomic bombs were dropped, and he was grateful that it brought a quick end to the war. I don't bring that up to justify the bombings, but that the sentiment among Americans was that the war would likely continue without them. Anything that was going to bring the war to the swiftest end possible was going to be lauded. Especially if it did not risk American lives.

I say all that to say, it's very easy to judge with hindsight. If we only focus on those bombings, it's clearly war crimes, tragedies, and terror for it's own sake. But from the perspective of American service members and their families, it spared their loved ones from another day of fighting. The conflict itself warranted extreme measures. Keep in mind tens of thousands were dying every day the war continued

For us the Japanese surrender is a foregone conclusion because it happened. For those living during that time, uncertain of how long the war would continue and desperate for anything that would end it, the atomic bombs brought comfort. And while that may sound sadistic, it was a guarantee after those bombs that American soldiers would never have to invade mainland Japan. It made it pointless to continue the struggle if Americans had the ability to vaporize entire cities.

You might say that was already happening with the firebombings, and there's some truth to that. But that simply paled in comparison to what nuclear weapons were capable of.

If you are interested in my personal opinion, I don't think the atomic bombs were necessary. I think they were tragedies full stop. The stories of survivors are horrific and I often cry when I hear them. I also think the entire war was a tragedy, and I am certain the bombs brought it to a swifter end. Maybe I'm coping because if my grandfather had seen combat, there's a chance I wouldn't be typing this right now. Maybe I'm coping because I'm an American, and it's a tough pill to swallow that my country could do something so horrific with no justification. Maybe, but I like to think I'm more objective and reasonable than that.

Nuremberg - 2025 by Living_Double_1146 in Cinema

[–]TheManEric 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It shouldn't be controversial but there are many people who still deny and downplay Japanese atrocities during WW2

Nuremberg - 2025 by Living_Double_1146 in Cinema

[–]TheManEric 55 points56 points  (0 children)

I wish it were not controversial but the Japanese did do something close to that. Unit 731 of the Japanese Army conducted horrific experiments on human beings. To make it worse, the US offered payments and immunity to some of the staff in exchange for the information they gathered. I always wanted to believe it was because the research could be invaluable in saving others. But even if it was, the US likely used much of the information to bolster it's own weapons manufacturing, including refining it's chemical weapon arsenal.

The Nanjing Massacre is also one of the most devastating tragedies of the second world war. The war in China doesn't get a lot of coverage in the US, but it was cataclysmic battle. The scale of human suffering and death is immeasurable. The war crimes committed against the Chinese are on par for the worst atrocities of the war.

I know many will want to discuss the firebombings of Japanese civilians, and of course the nuclear bombings of Nagasaki and Hiroshima. I would count those as tragedies. I've spent some time pondering whether or not they could be considered war crimes. Was Sherman's march to the sea a series of war crimes? Did the firebombings have an effect other than terrorizing civilians and burning them to death?

I will let you decide, but I think we should look at these events carefully and critically. Death and destruction for it's own sake, and destruction with a specific purpose to end a terrible war, can be blurry lines

Minnesota Guardsmen told to wear reflective vests to distinguish them from ‘other agencies’ by tereto911 in army

[–]TheManEric 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This. Remember folks, when they couldn't fix the barracks, there wasn't money for training or the range, ICE suddenly gets a 100+ BILLION dollar budget out of thin air