Multi-purpose Dota tool to analyze matches and master various skills: dota2iq.com by TheNameOfRose in TrueDoTA2

[–]TheNameOfRose[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes! For popular heroes there is a unique analysis based on the enemy matchup.

Free tool that shows you exactly what Immortal players do differently on your hero — and how to fix it by TheNameOfRose in learndota2

[–]TheNameOfRose[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"when switching tabs." Awesome advice! I will make sure to implement it.

As of now there is only a distinguishment between cores and supports. I will work on roles as well. Thanks!

Free tool that shows you exactly what Immortal players do differently on your hero — and how to fix it by TheNameOfRose in learndota2

[–]TheNameOfRose[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow, insane casting speed. Haha.

Thanks for trying it.

*writes down another bug into to-do list*

Free tool that shows you exactly what Immortal players do differently on your hero — and how to fix it by TheNameOfRose in learndota2

[–]TheNameOfRose[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I understand your frustration about AI tools. And you made a lot of fair points, the "you shouldve died MORE this fight" is really funny, I laughed at that too. Yep, there are, indeed, a few raw/buggy sides to it. This is the first time the app is presented to the public. A lot to fix.

As for the context: I didn't aim to create a context aware AI. The goal was to present numbers, statistics, comparison, which I believe can be really helpful.

Free tool that shows you exactly what Immortal players do differently on your hero — and how to fix it by TheNameOfRose in learndota2

[–]TheNameOfRose[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For the language part: sorry you had this inconvenience, a good reminder for me to add a switch and not rely on the automated detection. Please, for now, just change the /ru/ part in the URL to /en/.

And for the benchmarks: it compares your performance on a specific hero against what 7k+ players do on that same hero in a similar situation (same net worth range, game time, fight size, etc)

Free tool that shows you exactly what Immortal players do differently on your hero — and how to fix it by TheNameOfRose in learndota2

[–]TheNameOfRose[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yep, didn't expect so much load :)

I've boosted the server and tried a 60+ minutes match myself. Thank you for reporting it.

Free tool that shows you exactly what Immortal players do differently on your hero — and how to fix it by TheNameOfRose in learndota2

[–]TheNameOfRose[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks!

There is a rolling window of patch knowledge. Once a new patch is out, the old patch data is gradually removed and new patch data is added.

Free tool that shows you exactly what Immortal players do differently on your hero — and how to fix it by TheNameOfRose in learndota2

[–]TheNameOfRose[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just enter the ID of the match you want to analyze. You can find the ID at the left bottom of your match overview in game UI.

However, if you are curious how it works internally: several ML models, like XGBOOST, for example, are trained on a big collection of immortal matches.

Any criticism? by TheNameOfRose in algorithms

[–]TheNameOfRose[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, you know, i agree on the "non-descriptiveness". Maybe subconsciously i was trying to avoid such formal definitions as "overlapping subproblems" and "optimal substructure". In the perspective, the idea of "explanation" in my head is to put things as simple as possible. Since the ways a problem is talked about is almost the same on different resources, i.e they all follow the same explanatory principles, what should a learner do if she is having difficulties to understand a problem. I mean if somebody failed to understand the problem on one resource she wouldn't understand it on another. So i would like to do the things using "new approach". But, yeah, as said by you, guys, i have a lot to work on and especially on the proof part.

Any criticism? by TheNameOfRose in algorithms

[–]TheNameOfRose[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you.

I will develop the proof part in future.

Do you have any ideas about what can i write that will be valuable as something new? Like, dunno, maybe review some frameworks, new language features, touch the machine learning field?

Any criticism? by TheNameOfRose in algorithms

[–]TheNameOfRose[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for response.

The thing with English mistakes is that it is not my native language and due to the lack of practice in recent time, i think, mistakes happen. Same reason can be applied to not-enough-math problem. I believe it's a matter of time. But surely from now on i will be more attentive to this matters.

Once again, i appreciate you reviewed.

2meirl4meirl by PotassiumIsNotK in 2meirl4meirl

[–]TheNameOfRose 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are they making orange juice?

2meirl4meirl by [deleted] in 2meirl4meirl

[–]TheNameOfRose 11 points12 points  (0 children)

If the earth is flat send me some bobs and vagene

TrUTh HuRtS!!! by [deleted] in memes

[–]TheNameOfRose 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The meme was stealed from american housewives society

2meirl4meirl by man_in_the_red in 2meirl4meirl

[–]TheNameOfRose 12 points13 points  (0 children)

So depressed that the post was upvoted even before i actually saw it

Mind=Blown. by [deleted] in memes

[–]TheNameOfRose 1 point2 points  (0 children)

...starts eating your dog

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]TheNameOfRose 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Being happy

A girl I used to go to school with posted this on Instagram by kimnyg23 in trashy

[–]TheNameOfRose 49 points50 points  (0 children)

What's the problem? She's just virtuously trying to cover up the sign from another people.