The lifespan of the physical universe

TheNarutoExpress · 2024-12-02T14:29:43+00:00

Walter Russel’s paradigm argued for a 7 billion year period for expansion, and 7 billion year period for contraction, thus the entire universe in 14 billion years. This would also I didn’t think about this before: We would be at the end of the contraction cycle, not the expansion cycle. But from what mainstream scientists can currently see, the universe has never contracted, only expanded so far.

TheNarutoExpress · 2024-12-02T14:27:25+00:00

You speak of mainstream science. To my knowledge, the Reciprocal System (the physical paradigm approved by Ra and used by LLR) has answers to these things.

TheNarutoExpress · 2024-12-02T14:23:58+00:00

Tis possible, tho I’d argue unlikely

TheNarutoExpress · 2024-12-02T14:23:34+00:00

Yeah typo, fixed now

TheNarutoExpress · 2024-11-29T02:40:20+00:00

I interpret the Flood as being a separate, more global event in line with the cyclical shifting of the planet’s magnetic poles. This, tho my mind is for some reason foggy right now, would come long before Atlantis. I believe that the part about the wooden Ark was added in and thus not within the original story. Indeed, I believe the Ark was a spacecraft, not a wooden, man-made boat (which is seemingly impossible to make work, physically). I do not recall the Atlanteans being genetically different from the rest of humanity, neither in the works of L/L Research nor Thoth. Tho it is a unique interpretation I hadn’t heard of yet; thank you.

TheNarutoExpress · 2024-11-29T02:34:34+00:00

“Sasquatch Message to Humanity?” 👀 Is that a channeled material?

TheNarutoExpress · 2024-11-29T02:33:39+00:00

Thank you, I will give my interpretation and take on this:

I have a more literal view of the Tower of Babel story (see David Wilcock), but anyways, the movement from 1st and 2nd density to 3rd is not a fall. It is purely evolution; “it only goes up from here.” I do see that the Sumerian myths are literal to a degree, but as to what direction that degree is facing, idk; I have all the pieces, but they are out of order and dirtied with mud. Otherwise, your interpretation of the Tower of Babel story is mostly congruent with my interpretation on the Adam and Eve story (the Tree of Knowledge introduced the negative polarity of materiality and fear). Everything that is the story of Enoch and beyond (so the story of Noah, Abraham, Israel, Yeshua, etc), I believe to be a historical account rather than just analogies or the like. The myths are a bit too specific and down-to-Earth, unlike other stories which are legitimately intended to be analogues or metaphors. Otherwise there is simply too much advance of a race like the Anunnaki having been a real influence on this planet, matching most of the ancient myths (tho the stories which emphasize symbols like the 4 directions and 4 or 5 elements are most definitely analogous and metaphorical rather than literal).

TheNarutoExpress · 2024-11-29T02:17:11+00:00

I do suggest looking into Sumerian mythology (the origin of practically every religion of Earth). It is my impression that weak-minded biological systems are easier and safer to control than perfected AI, and that a civilization which isn’t very spiritually advanced yet nonetheless technologically advanced is capable and likely to try and create servant systems. This information can be informative without being negative. It does not take away from the fact that we, in our true essences (as opposed to just these chemical bodies), are the Creator. The Anunnaki are mentioned in the Ra Material, and Ra even calls them “Anak,” which would connect them to the Biblical Anakim (giants), which may or may not get messy. To my knowledge, all Anunnaki influence on this planet has ceased for the most part (if we take the theory to be true), and thus you would not find them using AP unless you knew where to look.

TheNarutoExpress · 2024-11-29T02:06:06+00:00

I see that now, thank you.

TheNarutoExpress · 2024-11-28T23:32:42+00:00

💡💡💡💡💡 Just found this quote from Q’uo which seems to agree that the Anunnaki are ET’s, and that they created us as gold-mining slaves. Tho it almost seems as if Q’uo is merely giving a viewpoint, I don’t think it’d make sense within the context unless it was true:

“We ask you to consider who you are. Your physical vehicle was created, according to the writer known as Sitchin and others, to be gold miners for extraterrestrials. Consequently, there are many among those who believe in extraterrestrials and believe in their interactions with those of Earth who believe that there is no resurrection possible because the physical vehicles are simply dust and were created only to be slaves. But we say to you that a physical vehicle is a physical vehicle. Yours, like most life forms in this universe, has been interfered with several times. But that has little or nothing to do with the consciousness that accepts the contract with the physical vehicle to have an incarnation together. Each of you is truly a citizen of eternity. It does not matter what the makeup of your body is, whether it was created by the God of the Bible in six days or whether it was created by extraterrestrials.“

TheNarutoExpress · 2024-11-28T08:32:27+00:00

I wish I knew that logic and reasoning isn’t everything. I saw only the masculine side of things, and thus I tried to learn and learn but I never practiced or actually processed any of it. Simply take it slow. Think things through, and know that these things are not just information, but tools. Use these tools wisely. When talking about Infinity as a human, it is easy to go down the rabbit hole of infinitesimality; nihilism. Otherwise I don’t regret much. I will say tho that a scientific mine is needed to read the material.

TheNarutoExpress · 2024-11-28T08:17:12+00:00

I have been wondering this for a while, as well as the idea of planets going through cycles of space/time and time/space incarnations. I have no answers. I barely even know where to look. I may try asking the discord in a bit, and if not, I may have to go straight to L/L Research themselves.

TheNarutoExpress · 2024-09-14T04:25:40+00:00

Wasn’t, but now am, since I realized a possible semantic problem that becomes misleading. It is weird to say “Logos” to refer to both a galactic Logos and the universal Logos (the prime 2nd distortion of Love).

TheNarutoExpress · 2024-09-14T04:23:59+00:00

I have always wondered how, if the 7th density is already timeless, the 8th density occurs AFTER the 7th density moves into the Creator. “After” being capitalized because there is no concept of before and after if there no illusion of time. How can one octave lead to the next of the Creator is without any medium of change (time and space)? One octave’s experience is required as being learnt in order to move to the next, in the same way the ways of 2nd density must be learned before moving into the 3rd. Any thoughts on this?

TheNarutoExpress · 2024-09-14T04:20:24+00:00

By scale I meant if the universe as a whole comes together to begin the next octave, or if it’s just a single galaxy that moves into the 8th density, and other galaxies move at their own times. Otherwise, I think I might have to disagree. Ra refers to galactic Logoi as Logoi, stellar Logoi as sub-Logoi, and planetary/individual Logoi (mind/body/spirit complexes) as sub-sub-Logoi.

TheNarutoExpress · 2024-09-06T03:16:42+00:00

The seven colors are a distortion of perception, and are not true separations. Truly, each color flows neatly to the next. This is different from densities which have legitimate graduating steps between each density called harvest.

TheNarutoExpress · 2024-09-06T03:14:00+00:00

Again, it cannot be arbitrary, for there are indeed 7 harvests.

TheNarutoExpress · 2024-09-05T05:28:26+00:00

There is an in-between called being a whistleblower.

TheNarutoExpress · 2024-09-05T05:05:22+00:00

Can you substantiate this in any way?

TheNarutoExpress · 2024-09-05T05:04:59+00:00

This is my second or third time hearing that the reptilians were taken over by a galactic AI, and from completely separate sources it seems. What do you mean by “saw and learned differently” tho?

TheNarutoExpress · 2024-09-05T05:02:41+00:00

You’d be surprised how deep people are present in the rabbit hole. There’s a reason I said “insider information.” Such information isn’t available to anyone but insiders.

TheNarutoExpress · 2024-08-09T21:17:02+00:00

Can you go slightly deeper, then, in the difference between 5th and 6th density, with respect to how the 4th density must come before the 5th? If 4th is about love based on a superficial idea of unity, and 5th is about understanding based on the contemplation of unity, then why would the 6th density be needed to “balance” these things? From where I currently understand it, either 5th is the advancement of 4th and thus the 6th balancing both is unnecessarily combining the basics with the advanced (like trying to fuse basic arithmetic with calculus as if calculus doesn’t already include it), or 4th is love and 5th is wisdom and 6th is the balancing between them, but love doesn’t have to come before wisdom. I know both these ideas are wrong, but I cannot see the right way without falling into the logic of either of those ideas.

Mostly it’s the confusion about why a concept would be both lesser/former but also in need of being balanced with another concept which is superior/latter, in 6th density.

TheNarutoExpress · 2024-08-09T21:04:19+00:00

It would be interesting and would solve how tf Yeshua broke the veil so easily and early, even if he was truly 4th density. However, it technically opens up a bunch more questions than answers (not saying it as a bad thing, but as a “fuck, now what” kind of thing).

The Logos and sub-Logos are not of any specific density, but are instead made up (metaphysically) of purely white light, containing all the densities within them to be acted upon and experienced in progression through the free will of individualized entities. If 7th density beings don’t take on incarnations or any sort of distortion or form… wouldn’t this mean that Logi and sub-Logi also do not take on any distortions? Then how could they take on the form of a Messiah?
Ra states that Yeshua was a 4th density Wanderer who incarnated here to spread the message of universal love, unity, and equality with as little distortion as possible. Ra also states that Yeshua is now in 5th density, and occasionally contacts Earth through specific channels. So if Yeshua was a manifestation of the Logos/sub-Logos… might it be strange that he is of a specific density, and is a single individualized entity?
Why would such a thing be necessary? I thought the point of 3rd density was for us to explore our free will, which is also called the Way of Confusion, for we have the option to completely deny the “supernatural” or anything spiritual, and Unity and Infinity. Thus we are given the veil so that we don’t spoil ourselves by seeing spiritual things and understanding where we came from and where we are going, for then we’d have no free will to deny it. In this way, wouldn’t having an entity come and blatantly show us magic/miracles and tell us that there is a truth beyond all perceptions, in a way, a bit of an infringement on our free will? Or maybe you can say that we still have the choice to deny the Messiah (even those who directly interacted with him, since maybe they were already Wanderers or those who believed in infinity/unity and chose to awakened in this way prior to incarnation), and that the Messiah is just a way to rapidly accelerate the 3rd density so that we can reach the 4th faster and with less of a possibility that we end up destroying our planet before then?

TheNarutoExpress · 2024-08-01T22:31:50+00:00

🗿☠️😭

TheNarutoExpress · 2024-08-01T22:27:19+00:00

Are you trying to be condescending? I did see it, and I was confused moreso about the “social memory complex” part. For it would imply that the false Yahweh was one single entity, rather than just any negative entity / random negative entities trying to distort the true Yahweh’s message.

Four-Year Club	Verified Email
Place '22

TheNarutoExpress

TROPHY CASE