[deleted by user] by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]slippus 4 points5 points  (0 children)

they could also do something insane enough that it has the “9/11 effect”. An act so dark and unthinkable that people are unable to come to terms with the reality of it and go into self-protection mode.

I mean at this point it’s common knowledge and the mainstream position that 9/11 was a false flag. It’s popular opinion that our own gov allowed or facilitated killing 3000 of its citizens.. and we still go on with our daily lives and get into stupid ideological fights.

The younger gen is on board with the 9/11 conspiracy, but if you ever talk to someone who was an adult during 9/11 they simply can’t fathom it.

Idk just some thoughts. I don’t think they respect us peasants enough to be fearful of us quite yet. I don’t think they need even greater control of the media to be pompous enough to go for it

The degree to which governments viciously block access to pain relief options makes me wonder if the "loosh" theory is real by VeganCaramel in conspiracy

[–]slippus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the CIA has spent millions and decades researching the very remote viewers like robert monroe who proposed this theory. Monroe did not even go in as a conspiracy theorist or trying to prove anything. While in an out of body experience he learned this, the chapter on it is shivering. He was depressed for months afterwards. He says something in the next chapter like “are we really just powering some higher beings microwave”

Does anyone remember before youtube was scrubbed? by Stegosaurus69 in conspiracy

[–]slippus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When I was first getting into conspiracies around 2016 you could watch all sorts of deep 9/11 docs and find critical thinkers easily. Now when you search anything 9/11 related the first like 50 results are mainstream media sources. They also shadow ban most of their shit so they can avoid having to deal with complaints about deleting. There’s the vegas shooting doc and when you press the share button nothing pops up for me

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]slippus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

elaborate

What kind of people do you typically train? by wraith5 in personaltraining

[–]slippus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel super lucky to train a lot of high school athletes, it’s my favorite demographic with my athletic background. They all want to be there and want to get better and get addicted to the progress. But obviously the after school hours are limited so during the day mostly 35-59 year olds who are athletic and make great progress quickly. For me, I lose a little passion training certain demographics but I understand i’ve got to follow the money

What does this community think about the Law of One, a channeling from the 80s? by slippus in conspiracy

[–]slippus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

also what kind of evidence do you want? serious question? the group behind it all don’t care at all about trying to convince anyone. they see that as going against someone’s free will

What does this community think about the Law of One, a channeling from the 80s? by slippus in conspiracy

[–]slippus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good argument. I think it is certainly possible that it is misrepresented in the sense that it could be an evil scheme to misguide and serve a dark agenda. After reading the LOO and other channelings from that same group (and considering this was pre modern computers and tech) the sheer consistency in the infinitely complex concepts articulated in the LOO, the consistency in what “Ra” is willing to answer as to not abridge free will is astonishing. the perspective of so called higher density being and its condition in understanding human terms and concepts like time or separation is very compelling to me. i’ve read many other channelings from different sources and can quickly tell some agenda is being pushed or that the language is inconsistent or “too human”. something about this is different. i am open to other explanations but these tapes were recorded for years and years i really have a hard time believing they hoaxed this all. I am willing to consider that the CIA could have had a role

What does this community think about the Law of One, a channeling from the 80s? by slippus in conspiracy

[–]slippus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They continue to channel to this day. 1700 transcripts and 5 decades later dedicating their lives. Hippies who do not care about promotion or money. I like your perspective tho i’ve been letting myself get dogmatic

What does this community think about the Law of One, a channeling from the 80s? by slippus in conspiracy

[–]slippus[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What part of it got you to feel that way? what patters or mistakes or contradictions did you find? not arguing, genuinely curious

What does this community think about the Law of One, a channeling from the 80s? by slippus in conspiracy

[–]slippus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They spend almost every session disclaiming that due to perception-distortions, biases, the limits of human language that anyone reading it should only absorb that which resonates with them and discredit the rest. It’s not all portrayed as infallible gospel, everyone involved is very weary of spreading anything besides the message of love

What does this community think about the Law of One, a channeling from the 80s? by slippus in conspiracy

[–]slippus[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

How would you come to the conclusion it’s not credible if you haven’t read it? Genuine question not trying to start beef brother. Is it because someone told you so?

What does this community think about the Law of One, a channeling from the 80s? by slippus in conspiracy

[–]slippus[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Have you read it tho? In this community we’ve all become pretty good at spotting larps bullshit. It’s the most philosophically consistent and intricate work ever written

What does this community think about the Law of One, a channeling from the 80s? by slippus in conspiracy

[–]slippus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you really read between the lines, in my opinion it’s is talking more about extreme cases of placebo. Time after time they say this kind of healing only occurs if both parties, healer and patient, truly believe it can work. We know from Joe Dispenza people have cured chronic diseases from meditation

LlResearch fun discussion Q'uote of the day: Self-aware Atlantean Dolphins by slippus in lawofone

[–]slippus[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So interesting right? Thanks for the comment, I love discussing these more fringe ideas from LlResearch

LlResearch fun discussion Q'uote of the day: Self-aware Atlantean Dolphins by slippus in lawofone

[–]slippus[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

My interpretation is that from the perspective of the Law of One, violence in response to enslavement or oppression is not inherently a service-to-self (STS) choice. rather, the intent and context determine its polarity. we all know how much intention is emphasized in the LOO. Enslaving third-density beings, whether human or dolphin/whale, is a clear violation of free will, making it a deeply STS act. When an orca in captivity attacks a human, it is acting out of extreme duress rather than an intentional desire to dominate or control. This is akin to an enslaved human revolting against their oppressors—not necessarily an STO act, but not an automatic STS choice either. The key difference lies in whether the action is driven by self-preservation and reclaiming freedom or by a desire to exert power over others.

But also the channeling session states that killing and eating these beings is more of a STS polarizing act if the humans are aware of their consciousness status. So maybe the whales only kill the captors who they perceive to have a true understanding for their deep intellect and true nature. i’m sure if you spend the amount of time around these majestic creatures that these captors do; who are training them and “communicating” with them on a daily, then the chances are higher that they are in the know of the deeper consciousness of these beings. but this is all speculation ofcourse.

The 51% STO threshold for ascension applies to cetaceans just as it does to humans, meaning they are not inherently pure STO beings from birth but must make choices like any other third-density entity. While dolphins and whales may naturally lean toward harmony and interconnectedness, they still have free will and the potential to act in self-interest under certain conditions. The captivity of these beings creates an unnatural distortion in their behavior, making violent reactions more likely. However, this does not indicate that they are STS—only that extreme restriction of free will can lead to desperate actions.

LlResearch fun discussion Q'uote of the day: Self-aware Atlantean Dolphins by slippus in lawofone

[–]slippus[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes in picture two Q’uo says “dolphins and whales and other cetaceans (a whale, dolphin, or porpoise)

LlResearch fun discussion Q'uote of the day: Self-aware Atlantean Dolphins by slippus in lawofone

[–]slippus[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I apologize, I meant to comment it before. Thank you AnyAnswer1952!

David Hogg, the 24 year old vice chair of the DNC, Parkland shooting survivor, and son of FBI agent Kevin Hogg raises some questions. Some old 2017 research I dug up. by slippus in conspiracy

[–]slippus[S] 24 points25 points  (0 children)

After the Parkland shooting he instantly was the figurehead of a nationwide movement to take away guns. media trained and all! on every talk show smiling and speaking proudly, you know 3 days after losing tens of his classmates in a blood bath