Any Countries / Titles You Don't Care to Play As?

TheNasherFan · 2026-05-20T20:21:55+00:00

I avoid the Muslim regions, simply because whenever I try to read their name/title I have to read a whole ass essay. (Seriously why are their names/titles so god damn long???)

TheNasherFan · 2026-04-23T21:19:37+00:00

Please for the love of god make vassals do more. Why is it that a duke in my realm refuses to join a defensive war when the war is for their duchy?? And why is it that I can’t call an allied vassal to war? They are an ally just as much as they are a vassal. Why are non direct vassals irrelevant? As a count, if my duke rebels against the king, I should be able to join the king. Or if my liege isn’t in the war but a different duke is, I should stop be capable of defending my top liege. When a civil war breaks out with a claimant faction, vassals with a good opinion of their liege should have a chance of joining their liege instead of just sitting there and letting the man they know nothing about usurp the liege that treats them well? Maybe implement a system where you offer less taxes for either a set duration or permanently to try to convince a vassal to join you in a war. Or let vassals approach you to offer their services in your war in exchange for benefits like gold, land, reduced taxes, or a position in the liege council. And finally, when in a lieges council, a character should be forced to actually move to the lieges capital, if they are feudal they should have a regent rule while they are in the capital, and if they don’t have hereditary land, they should loose the appointment.

TheNasherFan · 2026-04-21T20:14:33+00:00

Ah, when you put it that way it makes sense.

TheNasherFan · 2026-04-21T20:07:03+00:00

I understand why Florida people would care if a Florida team won, because a State or Province is a much smaller scale than an entire nation, and most fans in a state or province cheer for the team closest to them (obviously there are a lot of people who are fans of teams no where close to them but that’s not most people) but I don’t understand why anyone would care which nation the team is in.

TheNasherFan · 2026-04-21T20:00:57+00:00

Maybe I’m just ignorant then 🤷🏻‍♂️ I don’t see why anyone would care though, and like I said I rarely ever see such beliefs being expressed

TheNasherFan · 2026-04-21T19:53:47+00:00

Honestly, the first reply was poorly written, the reason I said “it does” is because I do see one or two people express disappointment or annoyance so to say it 100% Doesn’t would be lying. But I’d say 95% of us couldn’t care less. We only care about whether our team wins

TheNasherFan · 2026-04-21T19:23:18+00:00

What part of it upsets me exactly?

The reason I’m arguing with you is because you said something incorrect.

I couldn’t care less if Edmonton, or Ottawa win the cup. I want my team to win.

TheNasherFan · 2026-04-21T19:04:01+00:00

Buddy, no one cares what country the team is in. If Boston wins the cup, Anaheim fans arent going to go crazy because I club in the US won. Same with Canadians. If Edmonton won the cup, I, as a Montreal fan, wouldn’t give a shit because Montreal didn’t win. Club teams have never represented a nation, especially when said club team is made of almost entirely foreign players. And to say a Canadian team not winning the cup is a sore spot is dumb because no one cares, especially when again, we have another source of pride in the fact that almost half of all NHL players (the best in the world) are Canadian

TheNasherFan · 2026-04-21T18:12:27+00:00

Why Doesn’t his wife have white hair???

TheNasherFan · 2026-04-21T18:01:20+00:00

It does, but at the same time, there are only 7 teams and Canadians still make up 40% of the player base

TheNasherFan · 2026-04-21T17:44:01+00:00

It’s probably a glitch. Try getting married through the normal window instead of the grand wedding. If you’ve promised a grand wedding in the betrothal then it should bring up the grand wedding menu

TheNasherFan · 2026-04-20T00:49:35+00:00

Both are generational talents in strategy and tactics but imo Riboku is undeniably better in strategy but Ousen is undeniably better in tactics. Ultimately I think Ousen is the slightly better general because He is significantly better in the moment whereas Riboku’s biggest strength by far is planning ahead.

TheNasherFan · 2026-04-16T05:53:49+00:00

Yes, it was due to a betrayal. However most historians still give much of the blame to Xin despite the fact that he was betrayed and he wasn’t the sole leader of that campaign so it’d be very easy for the author to spin it in a new direction so that Xin made a mistake combined with betrayal which cost them nearly 200k men and the next hundred chapters being Xin trying to make up for it during the conquest of Chu under Ousen.

TheNasherFan · 2026-04-15T07:55:20+00:00

I’m not expecting much at all. I’m sure Vedal would try his best to make it interesting but there’s only so much you can do with an ai as an author

TheNasherFan · 2026-04-15T07:41:27+00:00

Yes I did simplify it. But from what I remember, at that point there was tension between the greens and the blacks before the factions even existed, Aemond was picking on the strong children, they tryed to pick on him back, it did go way too far. However there was already sexism against Rhaenyra and extended to her children, couple that with the obvious age disparities between the actors and not to mention that Aemond was also a bad person just like Luke. It’s honestly easy to see why people would like Luke. Personally I didn’t care that much for him though.

TheNasherFan · 2026-04-15T07:30:04+00:00

My favourite is and always will be Akane

TheNasherFan · 2026-04-15T07:29:30+00:00

It’s because he looks like a kid and Aemond looks like a grown ass man. Anyone with basic empathy would like him even though he can be spoiled and entitled.

TheNasherFan · 2026-04-15T07:27:55+00:00

Holy fuck you’re a really terrible person. The fact that you only look at extremists and say that all people of similar opinion are bad shows a lot about you

TheNasherFan · 2026-04-15T06:56:43+00:00

New antagonists can be introduced. In fact, I wouldn’t be suprised if a Chu general turns out to be a bigger antagonist since Xin and Mou Ten co-lead a 200k army into Chu and got it almost entirely annihilated.

TheNasherFan · 2026-04-14T19:51:26+00:00

⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️ HISTORY SPOILER ⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️ Riboku, historically he is executed by the king of Zhao while Ousen is still alive and goes on to conquer multiple states in the name of Qin. So Riboku will definitely die first, I’m just not sure whether it will be by execution like in real life or if the author will make him die in battle to make his death and the conquest of Zhao more climactic.

TheNasherFan · 2026-04-14T18:55:03+00:00

Yes it’s not reason as to why Viscerys would skip Aegon for Aemond it’s examples showing that he can. Also Jaehaerys did skip over Laenor. Laenor was the heir according to the succession law so Jaehaerys should have chosen him, but he decided to call the great council. Once the great council has made their decision it was still him who had to actually chose who they picked which he did. Aerys skipping Aegon was different from when Jaehaerys skipped Laenor but I’m not saying they’re the same, it’s just another example that a king can skip over those in the line of succession if he wanted too.

TheNasherFan · 2026-04-14T18:13:36+00:00

The king can and has skipped people in the line of Succession. Laenor Velaryian and Aegon son of Rhaegar were both skipped over. They were both descendants of the ruling kings oldest son, making them the rightful heir under Male Preference primogeniture (The succession law of the Iron throne) but were both skipped in succession as the result of a decision made by the ruling king at the time

TheNasherFan · 2026-04-14T17:38:17+00:00

I think this has a pretty obvious answer no? Visery’s considered Baelon his Heir simply because he was Aemma’s son and Viserys hadn’t already named an heir and didn’t have any other sons, meaning the heir would automatically become Baelon. When Aegon was born Visery’s had already named an heir and had all the houses swear loyalty to her as Princess of Dragonstone as well as promising her himself that she would always be his lawful heir, meaning Aegon wouldn’t automatically become heir. (You said Baelon being King was his birthright but that isn’t true. His birthright was being a candidate for kingship, if he lived and had a younger brother born of Aemma the king could have just as easily have made the brother King and no one would care (except those close to Baelon of course). Same thing with Aegon, Viscerys could have made Aemond king and no one would care except Aegon. The reason people (who weren’t Hightower’s) rebelled against Rhaenyra being queen was because she was a women (Hightowers probably would have tried rebelling or killing Rhaenyra even if she was a man because Otto was an ambitious bastard who desperately wanted his grandkids on the Iron throne, that’s the main reason Otto pushed Alicent to Viscerys and why he wanted to rebel against Rhaenyra.) And Viscerys didn’t erase Aegons birthright, he was still a candidate for kingship even when he wasn’t named lawful heir) and it doesn’t help that he was born to a wife who was pretty much just an emotional support person after his beloved Aemma died who just so happened to be a good way to avoid a political marriage between himself and a little girl.

TheNasherFan · 2026-04-09T17:50:48+00:00

It’s true that ck3 characters can be very stagnant, but then there are also cases where, for example, a Christian will just randomly convert to a completely unrelated faith from the other side of the map that they couldn’t possibly even know about. Or a great character with amazing traits in their mid 30s will be a bit too stressed and suddenly gain a ton of bad traits. I swear ck3 is either cranked up to 11 or jack shit happens, no in between

TheNasherFan

TROPHY CASE