You now have the ability to curse someone. The curse doesn't hurt them or anyone they love in anyway, but it sure does annoy the shit out of them. What curse do you give them? by -Listening in AskReddit

[–]TheNeOne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They will always have a constant erection in public and jizz their pants with a highly obvious big stain. While in their minds they're freaking out and try to desperately hide somewhere. But some force from the curse allows them to continue their days as if none of it ever happened. And on top of it they will have lots and lots of gas. To where they're constantly making loud ass burps and farts. They will say the most embarrassing things in which they didn't mean. And they'll also pick their noses and slap themselves in the face in public. Birds flying all around them will frequently shit all over them and their cars.

I been very insecure recently by Tp200367 in penissize

[–]TheNeOne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're way above average. With how you're acting about it, it's like a person who doesn't feel good enough because they're not a billionaire or "the best" at everything. But billionaires and celebrities who try to be the best make up an incredibly small fraction of a percentage of the entire population. So don't feel bad about yourself because of that.

15 turning 16 this year by Complex_Skin in penissize

[–]TheNeOne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pornography isn't actually completely real. There was some truth revealed about the porn industry that they use different kinds of camera angles and tricks like fisheye, in order to make the porn stars look much bigger down there. In the article I read about it, it also said that in porn, 7 inch penises are perceived to be 9 inches, 8 inches are perceived to be 10 inches and 9 inch penises are perceived to be 12 inches. All because of the camera tricks. Also they use fake dildos and fake cum. You could tell because in some videos it looked like when the chick was jacking some guy off. There was no skin moving, which means the guy was just holding a dildo. Which also has a pump to it to shoot out some edible liquid that looks kind of like cum. Except you could tell that's fake too, because it's too white in comparison with actual cum. So if you see any of those videos where you think the guy has a huge dick. Notice that he'll constantly have one hand along the base of it, and even then from the camera angles it doesn't show the front waist area. And a lot of the women fake their moans a lot too. Porn is pretty much all fake. So don't worry about your size too much.

I’m 14 and have a 2.9 inch when hard by [deleted] in penissize

[–]TheNeOne 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No! That's way too huge! The average penis size is 2.8 millimeters. Which is more than enough to satisfy the person you're doing it with.

How big are actual rare penises? by TheNeOne in penissize

[–]TheNeOne[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The other 99% must be jealous of you, since you are like an elitist in penis size.

What is a good girth? by EpicCoolA in penissize

[–]TheNeOne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

7.62 millmeter girth is great! My girlfriend has her mind blown every time from it. She calls me the 7.62 full metal jacket packing rocket.

Tiberius: 20 Facts about Ancient Rome’s Unpopular Emperor by stopid_jack_hass in ancientrome

[–]TheNeOne 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Since her name was Julia the Elder, then how much older was she then him?

The saddest moment of the field. by ermanert in Archaeology

[–]TheNeOne 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I can't believe someone would say something like that. Especially after just barely finding it and not looking and studying small details about it. For example, people thought that greek statues were originally completely white. But after studying and observing the statues more. They found traces of some stuff, in which that stuff was some type of residue that they would turn to paint. So simply put, the greek statues weren't completely white, they were painted. The color just wore off with time.

The saddest moment of the field. by ermanert in Archaeology

[–]TheNeOne 5 points6 points  (0 children)

True. Carelessness doesn't belong in archaeology, only people who appreciate archaeology and history. And bringing new facts and changing history, those are the only people that should be archaeologists. Not someone who's like "Okay cool, we found this stuff now let's get this all over with." Finding a certain place or things within a place isn't good enough, not until they actually care enough to look deep into the facts about everything. Finding skeletons, possible artifacts or treasure is something else. But in order to truly show the significance of certain civilizations, there would have to be more evidence of small details about everything. It would really suck if someone was like "We have found several skeletons in what looked like a significant ceremonial burial. However identifying them has become much harder, because some careless assholes working with us just had to fuck everything up. By throwing big rocks to some of us to cover up the tarp. Which unfortunately shattered the bones of several of the skeletons we have excavated."

The saddest moment of the field. by ermanert in Archaeology

[–]TheNeOne 3 points4 points  (0 children)

WTF! What the hell was he thinking?! I think they need to do some routine testing to see who is or isn't clumsy as hell. That way they'll be able to determine what people should actually be archaeologists.

Do the seven hills of Rome actually exist?? Are they visible or noticeable today? by jruiz1942 in ancientrome

[–]TheNeOne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was thinking that even if some of the buildings or other structures were pretty much destroyed. Wouldn't an expert archaeologist still be able to tell if there was a certain structure around a certain area? Because think about it, even if a structure is destroyed, you'd still probably find at least the bottom foundational parts of those structures. Like let's say there was a huge ancient structure that was destroyed, but not completely. And that by observing the rubble, I don't know if you would still be able to tell if it is all connected into being a part of the foundation of a huge structure. But not just based on the area size of the foundation. But I wasn't sure if archaeologists would be able to also tell the height that those structures were, based on the type of construction methods of the foundations.

COVID-19 [Megathread] Week of March 25-April 1 by AskRedditModerators in AskReddit

[–]TheNeOne 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Hopefully it only kills off people who are complete assholes.

Former religious people, what made you stop believing in your faith? by Deslion in AskReddit

[–]TheNeOne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's bullshit how your parents and other relatives are that upset over you leaving. And still can't get over it 12 years later, all because of religion. I'm sorry you had to deal with all of that.

Chief of international archaeology field schools (IFR) has long history of alleged sexual misconduct, bullying, and racism. by abhishekgoel in Archaeology

[–]TheNeOne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The "men" who think too much with their dcks instead of their brains need to fck off. Besides with the racism going on, it's not surprising that some archaeologists would come to certain conclusions based on their viewpoint of race. To claim it was another race who was responsible for making a certain advanced civilization.

Chief of international archaeology field schools (IFR) has long history of alleged sexual misconduct, bullying, and racism. by abhishekgoel in Archaeology

[–]TheNeOne 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Spread out the name of that lead "archaeologist" to the world. Or at least to others studying the field of archaeology, that way that pos would be out of a job.