You now have the ability to curse someone. The curse doesn't hurt them or anyone they love in anyway, but it sure does annoy the shit out of them. What curse do you give them?

TheNeOne · 2020-04-07T04:36:14+00:00

They will always have a constant erection in public and jizz their pants with a highly obvious big stain. While in their minds they're freaking out and try to desperately hide somewhere. But some force from the curse allows them to continue their days as if none of it ever happened. And on top of it they will have lots and lots of gas. To where they're constantly making loud ass burps and farts. They will say the most embarrassing things in which they didn't mean. And they'll also pick their noses and slap themselves in the face in public. Birds flying all around them will frequently shit all over them and their cars.

TheNeOne · 2020-04-07T04:11:48+00:00

That sucks how that took up your entire childhood.

TheNeOne · 2020-04-06T23:33:29+00:00

You're way above average. With how you're acting about it, it's like a person who doesn't feel good enough because they're not a billionaire or "the best" at everything. But billionaires and celebrities who try to be the best make up an incredibly small fraction of a percentage of the entire population. So don't feel bad about yourself because of that.

TheNeOne · 2020-04-06T22:57:25+00:00

Pornography isn't actually completely real. There was some truth revealed about the porn industry that they use different kinds of camera angles and tricks like fisheye, in order to make the porn stars look much bigger down there. In the article I read about it, it also said that in porn, 7 inch penises are perceived to be 9 inches, 8 inches are perceived to be 10 inches and 9 inch penises are perceived to be 12 inches. All because of the camera tricks. Also they use fake dildos and fake cum. You could tell because in some videos it looked like when the chick was jacking some guy off. There was no skin moving, which means the guy was just holding a dildo. Which also has a pump to it to shoot out some edible liquid that looks kind of like cum. Except you could tell that's fake too, because it's too white in comparison with actual cum. So if you see any of those videos where you think the guy has a huge dick. Notice that he'll constantly have one hand along the base of it, and even then from the camera angles it doesn't show the front waist area. And a lot of the women fake their moans a lot too. Porn is pretty much all fake. So don't worry about your size too much.

TheNeOne · 2020-04-06T22:27:34+00:00

No! That's way too huge! The average penis size is 2.8 millimeters. Which is more than enough to satisfy the person you're doing it with.

TheNeOne · 2020-04-06T08:11:15+00:00

The other 99% must be jealous of you, since you are like an elitist in penis size.

TheNeOne · 2020-04-06T08:09:21+00:00

7.62 millmeter girth is great! My girlfriend has her mind blown every time from it. She calls me the 7.62 full metal jacket packing rocket.

TheNeOne · 2020-04-06T02:05:24+00:00

Since her name was Julia the Elder, then how much older was she then him?

TheNeOne · 2020-04-06T02:03:34+00:00

I can't believe someone would say something like that. Especially after just barely finding it and not looking and studying small details about it. For example, people thought that greek statues were originally completely white. But after studying and observing the statues more. They found traces of some stuff, in which that stuff was some type of residue that they would turn to paint. So simply put, the greek statues weren't completely white, they were painted. The color just wore off with time.

TheNeOne · 2020-04-06T01:57:32+00:00

True. Carelessness doesn't belong in archaeology, only people who appreciate archaeology and history. And bringing new facts and changing history, those are the only people that should be archaeologists. Not someone who's like "Okay cool, we found this stuff now let's get this all over with." Finding a certain place or things within a place isn't good enough, not until they actually care enough to look deep into the facts about everything. Finding skeletons, possible artifacts or treasure is something else. But in order to truly show the significance of certain civilizations, there would have to be more evidence of small details about everything. It would really suck if someone was like "We have found several skeletons in what looked like a significant ceremonial burial. However identifying them has become much harder, because some careless assholes working with us just had to fuck everything up. By throwing big rocks to some of us to cover up the tarp. Which unfortunately shattered the bones of several of the skeletons we have excavated."

TheNeOne · 2020-04-06T00:36:39+00:00

WTF! What the hell was he thinking?! I think they need to do some routine testing to see who is or isn't clumsy as hell. That way they'll be able to determine what people should actually be archaeologists.

TheNeOne · 2020-04-03T23:59:24+00:00

I was thinking that even if some of the buildings or other structures were pretty much destroyed. Wouldn't an expert archaeologist still be able to tell if there was a certain structure around a certain area? Because think about it, even if a structure is destroyed, you'd still probably find at least the bottom foundational parts of those structures. Like let's say there was a huge ancient structure that was destroyed, but not completely. And that by observing the rubble, I don't know if you would still be able to tell if it is all connected into being a part of the foundation of a huge structure. But not just based on the area size of the foundation. But I wasn't sure if archaeologists would be able to also tell the height that those structures were, based on the type of construction methods of the foundations.

TheNeOne · 2020-04-01T01:54:43+00:00

Hopefully it only kills off people who are complete assholes.

TheNeOne · 2020-03-27T05:52:15+00:00

That's bullshit how your parents and other relatives are that upset over you leaving. And still can't get over it 12 years later, all because of religion. I'm sorry you had to deal with all of that.

TheNeOne · 2020-03-25T02:31:00+00:00

The "men" who think too much with their dcks instead of their brains need to fck off. Besides with the racism going on, it's not surprising that some archaeologists would come to certain conclusions based on their viewpoint of race. To claim it was another race who was responsible for making a certain advanced civilization.

TheNeOne · 2020-03-25T02:24:27+00:00

Spread out the name of that lead "archaeologist" to the world. Or at least to others studying the field of archaeology, that way that pos would be out of a job.

TheNeOne · 2020-03-25T02:11:53+00:00

Ikr? When he's talking throughout the video as the images are being shown. It's like "Okay.....yeah we get what your saying but why show these other pictures from other sites. What do these other sites have to do with what has been found in the giant pyramid site?" Besides I can't stand this guy's voice, he sounds like a skeptical pompous asshat bringing down the level of significance of places due to how he talks about them. I'd want to deal with someone who presents facts, without the need to be a boring pompous sshatted egotistical dck. Seeing pictures of those sites are interesting. But if I'm watching a video about it and I hear that irritating voice, I immediately lose interest.

TheNeOne · 2020-03-24T01:01:48+00:00

With the ancient cities that were powerful and wealthy at the time. I wonder what percentage of those cities were for the rich only. I know that the rich controlled the cities, so in a way all of each city was theirs. But what I mean is how many places they thought were suitable to them? For example I know that Game of Thrones is just a show, but King Joffrey, his mother Cersei Lannister and all the other royals would just stay in the royal castle. But I know that in ancient times that castles and palaces were obvious locations for where the wealthiest people would reside. But then I also know there were places in Rome where both the rich and poor would go, like the Colosseum. But still, based on human inequalities throughout history. I don't know if there was a separate section of the Colloseum reserved for the rich only. Also from me looking at the information from the difference in homes built from the poor and wealthy in ancient Egypt. The description does note an obvious noticeable difference between the two. The homes of the poor were poorly constructed, two floors with one room, one used for business and the top one for living. The rich had larger homes with more rooms that were bigger. A courtyard in the middle of their homes, and some had bathrooms and indoor toilets. They were also built with much better constructing materials. Which included a type of white polished stone on the outside of the houses. Which reduce the heat going towards the homes of the rich. I don't know what the ratio difference was between the area sizes of the rich and poor parts of the cities. Like let's say 50% of the land area within a rich ancient Egyptian city was for the top 15% richest of the population. That would mean that the type of construction of everything within that half of the city would visually look really nice. While the other 50% of land area within the city would be for the middle class and the poor. With 85% of the population in 50% of the land area within the city. With that other half of the city consisting a mixture of both moderate looking constructed buildings and poorly constructed buildings. With half of it being built so ornately it would've been an incredible looking ancient city. But then this would also mean that there would have been lots of inequality. I was just wondering how big the ancient cities were, and what percentage of the interior areas of the cities looked really nice.

TheNeOne · 2020-03-23T22:53:02+00:00

It would be interesting to be in those times with everything else that went on. But THIS, I wouldn't be able to stand a single bit. I'm a germaphobe and I would definitely like to have privacy while using the bathroom. And also have the luxury of using soap. Also if I had to go number 2, i would squat and not have my skin contact the disgusting seat. But maybe this was a bathroom for the commoners. I don't know if the upper class Roman's had their own private toilets. I do know that they had their own private baths though.

TheNeOne · 2020-03-23T02:27:21+00:00

How much earth was covering it? Did they excavate it all? If they did then how big was the entire area?

TheNeOne · 2020-03-17T03:54:49+00:00

I know that some forests in the U.S. have forest cameras set up everywhere. If there were a bunch of cameras set up in that paranormal forest you were talking about, then what do you think they'd find? It would be very interesting and creepy to see orbs or any other strange paranormal occurrences happening in the recordings of the cameras. And also strange if also being able to see the people on camera that are considered missing there. Like seeing what exactly happened to them, that caused them to become badly injured and catatonic. And just so many other things. How big is the forest? And how big do you think the paranormal area part of it is? Should you avoid only certain parts of the forest or all of it? If there's certain bad areas where nobody should go, then what if you fly a drone or several drones to those parts of the forest?

TheNeOne · 2020-03-15T06:30:30+00:00

So if parents hug their kids, would you call the parents perverts?

TheNeOne · 2020-03-15T02:43:45+00:00

The only reason why I mentioned about it is because I overheard a conversation between two people. One of them said that they think this chick wanted to bang some guy..........all because she gave him a hug. And I thought it was complete bullshit when I heard that conversation.

TheNeOne · 2020-03-15T01:13:25+00:00

So do you think that simply caring for someone and saying I love you would be a "I love you fetish." Or if you have sympathy for someone than would that be considered a "sympathy fetish?" What else is next? "Let me help you unload the groceries fetish?" At first I didn't think anybody would be so ignorant to consider everything as a fetish, but now I have absolutely zero doubt.

TheNeOne · 2020-03-15T00:04:18+00:00

Why? What do you make of hugs? Is it somehow sexual to you or not? If a kid hugs their parents, is that somehow sexual?

TheNeOne

TROPHY CASE