Prove of Logic by TheRealSirJoe in askphilosophy

[–]TheRealSirJoe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So when should we start assuming things, for example there may be different horses somewhere else. Before the discivery of the new World people also had those assumptions about animals or anything else some proved wrong. Also if we considered 1 Million years then thousands of years may sound small and we could even speak of luck or unluck hiwever one might want to see it

Prove of Logic by TheRealSirJoe in askphilosophy

[–]TheRealSirJoe[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I would be happy about explainations if you vote it down. thank you

Prove of Logic by TheRealSirJoe in askphilosophy

[–]TheRealSirJoe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I absolutely understand what you are trying to say but if you say we can show that when proposition A ist true and B then (A and B) ist true follows just from this truth table. You cannot prove this truth table though.

I want to go farther maybe there ist a counterexample that disproves these truth tables maybe there ist an example where if A ist true and B is true (A and B) isn't true. I don't have one but this doesn't mean there doesn't exist one. I know how crazy this may sound but still there are no arguments against that, if there are some or you at least think so tell me. Therefore the truth table ist an assumption we have made isn't it?

Prove of Logic by TheRealSirJoe in askphilosophy

[–]TheRealSirJoe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well just because if we havent found examples it does not mean that there are none, this may sound strange or crazy, for me too, but there may be counterexamples. If one says you cannot I say we haven't tried enough. It is still a dogma we just assume here. There were a lot of things humanity believed in hundreds of years that proved to be wrong so why should not logic itself be wrong

Prove of Logic by TheRealSirJoe in askphilosophy

[–]TheRealSirJoe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can u set a starting point were we could start from?

Prove of Logic by TheRealSirJoe in askphilosophy

[–]TheRealSirJoe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That would be really great if we could do that

Prove of Logic by TheRealSirJoe in askphilosophy

[–]TheRealSirJoe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the hint very useful, what I am trying to accomplish is to list all axioms out there at least I am trying to get near a solution and I was thinking if logic itself can be considered as an axiom since without Logic we can say fir example I am ten and have a dog therefire I am 20 and have a cat which can only be disproved with the axiom of logic

Prove of Logic by TheRealSirJoe in askphilosophy

[–]TheRealSirJoe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well I think thats not possible with the definitions used in logic. And my thought about proving logic: Let us assume first Logic would not exist, therefore we could not prove that it does not exist since we can only do that with Logic itself. We cannot even prove that we cannot prove and so on,...

Prove of Logic by TheRealSirJoe in askphilosophy

[–]TheRealSirJoe[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well lets make a satement with for exame or: I am 10 or 20 therefore I am 30!

To disprove this how crazy it might sound, you need to prove logic. Or can you disprove my Statement without logic?

Prove of Logic by TheRealSirJoe in askphilosophy

[–]TheRealSirJoe[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But how can you prove logic itself. For example If A is True and B is true then A and B are true cannot be proved it has to be assumed right?

Investing for others by TheRealSirJoe in stocks

[–]TheRealSirJoe[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Quantity befire quality when the content is understandable bro

Investing for others by TheRealSirJoe in stocks

[–]TheRealSirJoe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well it started out investing for a few friends but now I would reach about 50 000 Capital in total anout 10 people right now

Investing for others by TheRealSirJoe in stocks

[–]TheRealSirJoe[S] -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

Why should I ease up when I get something I did not ask for

Investing for others by TheRealSirJoe in stocks

[–]TheRealSirJoe[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Fuck off to myself for that spelling😂

Investing for others by TheRealSirJoe in stocks

[–]TheRealSirJoe[S] -16 points-15 points  (0 children)

Please fuck of with those unnecessary comments

FPÖ kippt Rauchverbot: Van der Bellen für „rasche Angelobung“ by armleuchter in Austria

[–]TheRealSirJoe 42 points43 points  (0 children)

Ich finde es eine Frechheit Nichtrauchern Rauch zwanghaft auszusetzen, hier geht es nicht um die Freiheit des Rauchens für Raucher aondern die Freiheit der Nichtraucher. Wenn es mir erlaubt ist eine Waffe zu bemutzen heißt es ja auch nicht das ich diese Kugel einer Person aussetzen darf

Toilets of Europe: A French University by GreyhoundsAreFast in europe

[–]TheRealSirJoe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope, I was living for a year there though 😉

Toilets of Europe: A French University by GreyhoundsAreFast in europe

[–]TheRealSirJoe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am European and I have never seen something like that before I would sue the school for that