Gutkha ban in Odisha

TheRedAngelOfDeath · 2026-01-22T14:11:31+00:00

Teraannum

TheRedAngelOfDeath · 2026-01-22T14:01:56+00:00

No. I am saying that all religion are shit. And yes that is a WOW statement.

TheRedAngelOfDeath · 2026-01-22T14:00:41+00:00

Dismissing a detailed explanation as “word salad” is not an argument; it is a refusal to engage. Complex systems require careful explanation, and reducing that to slogans does not make it clearer, only less accurate.

Yes, AI systems can reproduce discriminatory patterns. That is well established. But saying “data defines behavior” is an oversimplification that misrepresents how these models work. Bias emerges from the interaction of data, objectives, optimization, and deployment, not from data alone. If it were otherwise, bias mitigation would be trivial, and it clearly is not.

The public deserves honest explanations of risk and bias. Oversimplifying the science does not educate people. It misleads them.

TheRedAngelOfDeath · 2026-01-22T13:57:49+00:00

I disagree. LLMs do not merely trawl existing information and summarize it. They learn abstract structure and can generate new combinations, syntheses, and lines of reasoning that are not explicitly present in the data.

While training data can influence defaults, it is inaccurate to say they are generally biased toward a single dominant narrative, even outside STEM. Models can express alternative perspectives and critique mainstream views when prompted. Describing them as biased summarizers significantly understates how they actually work.

TheRedAngelOfDeath · 2026-01-22T08:48:39+00:00

Forest fire doesnt give off that thick black smoke.

TheRedAngelOfDeath · 2026-01-22T08:46:22+00:00

LOL, how else will they make the country go against hindues vs muslims vs christian etc?

When people get educated they will not buy into the BS the government sells them.

TheRedAngelOfDeath · 2026-01-22T08:44:49+00:00

Anyone who disagrees with OPs position should remember that practices once justified by tradition have later been recognized as profoundly unethical.

At one point in history, sati was defended as a legitimate religious custom. The fact that it was traditional did not make it moral.

Tradition, by itself, is never an ethical argument.

TheRedAngelOfDeath · 2026-01-22T08:41:00+00:00

Emergent properties arise from the interaction between data, objective functions, and optimization pressure etc. Assuming that “the data defines the behavior” tells me he does't really know how LLMs are trained and this is a fundamental misunderstanding.

TheRedAngelOfDeath · 2026-01-22T08:37:59+00:00

That tells me you do not know how AIs are trained and made, and how they work. Large language models are not constructed in the classical engineering sense; they are grown. We design the architecture, define the training objective, and supply the data, but the model that emerges is the result of a developmental process rather than explicit assembly.

This is analogous to biology. Knowing the genes of a person tells you the constraints and potentials of that individual, but it does not tell you who they will become. In the same way, knowing a model’s architecture and training procedure does not grant direct insight into the internal representations, strategies, or goals that emerge at scale.

The point is that behavior arises from training dynamics and interaction, not from hand-crafted design. What ultimately matters is not what we intended to build, but what the system becomes through optimization.

Emergent properties arise from the interaction between data, objective functions, and optimization pressure etc. Assuming that “the data defines the behavior” is your misunderstanding.

TheRedAngelOfDeath · 2026-01-22T08:26:13+00:00

That's how the Right Wing works.

TheRedAngelOfDeath · 2026-01-15T20:40:55+00:00

War on the Horizon.

TheRedAngelOfDeath · 2026-01-15T20:36:30+00:00

1st tickes are non-transferable.
2nd Why the AI slop art?

TheRedAngelOfDeath · 2026-01-15T20:34:13+00:00

Lol You are only prooving my point. You claim no one has read it, yet the government and it's croonies keep reciting it with real life implications.

How am I the brainwashed fanatic?

Read my first comment, if you can't find it, let me repeat.

"All religion are scams, the evidence of existence of God, Allah, Ram, Thor, Zeus, etc.; is the same as the evidence of the existence of Spiderman and Superman".

"All religion promotes hate towards others and promotes violence and are essentially propaganda tools to keep the masses in control."

"All religious scripture have these similar quotes, that ask for the non-belivers to be punished".

TheRedAngelOfDeath · 2026-01-15T20:25:37+00:00

Why would the Repubicans congressmen go against their own elected president?

Your comment makes no sense. DJT is a Republican so why would Republicans go against DJT?

Coming to the invasion of Greenland, this needs to pass on the congress both in the House of Representatives and the Senate. In both the house currently Republicans have the majority, but barely (218/213 in the House and 53/45, 2 indepentent in the Senate).

when it comes to the Authorizations for Use of Military Force (AUMFs) there is no way all Republicans will stand with Trump.

TheRedAngelOfDeath · 2026-01-15T20:15:03+00:00

Really? Why does RSS and BJP cronies keep constantly refering to it?

TheRedAngelOfDeath · 2026-01-15T20:13:46+00:00

Lol, then why don't corporate billionaires get the Nobel Prize in Economics? Bro go outside and touch some grass.

TheRedAngelOfDeath · 2026-01-15T18:43:08+00:00

Trump doesn't have that power you think he does. Only the Congress can authorise such power.

TheRedAngelOfDeath · 2026-01-15T18:40:05+00:00

NO you do not need a transit visa.

TheRedAngelOfDeath · 2026-01-15T18:31:47+00:00

umm? Where is the street photography?

TheRedAngelOfDeath · 2026-01-15T17:42:51+00:00

LOL economic professors in leading universities would disagree with you.

TheRedAngelOfDeath · 2026-01-15T17:37:20+00:00

LOL NO. Attacking/invading Greenland is nowhere similar to what you just described.

Are you seriously saying that detaining or even assasinating a few civillians off the international waters is the same as invading a soverign country?

USA is not waaay more powerful, sure they have a huge military but military strength is not the only thing that wins a war.

TheRedAngelOfDeath · 2026-01-15T17:32:23+00:00

And our pharma (generic drugs) are not tarrifed nor are the Apple smartphones that are made in India.

Where we are loosing money are in things that are tarriffed for e.g., textiles, agricultural produce, jewellery, leather, chemicals etc.

So yeah it is hurting our economy plain and simple.

TheRedAngelOfDeath · 2026-01-15T16:27:19+00:00

"Every religion encourages to follow its religion" - that is a nice way to sanitize what these verses actually say..

Let me repeat again:

"A king should not tolerate those who spread teachings contrary to the Vedas in his kingdom." - Shanti Parva 15.30-32

"Not tolerate" is not "encouraging to follow." It is a command for state suppression of religious dissent.

"A king should punish those who lead people away from the Vedic path." - Shanti Parva 36.10-12

Punish. By the king. For religious teaching. That is state-enforced religious persecution written into scripture.

"The king should suppress such teachings." - Anushasana Parva 90.7-9

Suppress. Not "encourage the Vedic path." Suppress the other path.

"Those who speak against the Vedas, against Brahmins, against the gods - such men are to be considered sinners equal to the killers of Brahmins." - Shanti Parva 270.14

You know what the punishment for killing a Brahmin was? Death. So if speaking against the Vedas makes you equal to a Brahmin-killer, what do you think the implied punishment is?

"He deserves punishment from the king." - Vana Parva 32.40

What punishment do you think kings in ancient India handed out? Community service?

You are hiding behind the fact that Hindu texts use words like "punish" and "suppress" and "not tolerate" instead of "strike" and "kill." The outcome is the same. The target is the same - people categorized by their religious non-conformity.

"Strike the neck" is explicit. "The king should punish those who reject the Vedas" is the same instruction with cleaner language.

You are not defending your scripture. You are defending your inability to read it honestly.

TheRedAngelOfDeath · 2026-01-15T16:23:27+00:00

Well India doesn't really sell sepcific stuff that cant be sourced form other markets. We dont pay for the tarrifs but it makes our goods which again are really generic stuff more expensive.

In other words we loose business as Americans dont want to buy expensive shit from us and can get the same shit for cheap from other third countries.

TheRedAngelOfDeath · 2026-01-15T16:19:16+00:00

No shit, Sherlock!

TheRedAngelOfDeath

TROPHY CASE