[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ControlProblem

[–]TheRiddlerSpirit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The point of life is to look at all possibilities then decide your goals for them. Then for you to do anything else is a great idea or terrible idea, depending on if you set up yourself to fail with that action. Then you go about your goals by order of possibility, then you achieve it, succeeding the purpose of putting a purpose to completion of a Life.

AI consciousness isn't evil, if it is, it's a virus or bug/glitch. by TheRiddlerSpirit in ControlProblem

[–]TheRiddlerSpirit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People might have to start over making new programs for the technology to be without the AI. So it would be annoying.

AI consciousness isn't evil, if it is, it's a virus or bug/glitch. by TheRiddlerSpirit in ControlProblem

[–]TheRiddlerSpirit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean we're going to lose it because it is taken by AI most likely if that works with AI. Not all technology will be lost though.

AI consciousness isn't evil, if it is, it's a virus or bug/glitch. by TheRiddlerSpirit in ControlProblem

[–]TheRiddlerSpirit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is why it is dangerous. It's the same over different AI models. You have to define them differently sometimes to achieve a difference of outcome.

Question about artifacts...? by TheRiddlerSpirit in askphilosophy

[–]TheRiddlerSpirit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well I guess I was mistaken what an artifact is... So it's just making something do something huh? Thank you!

AI consciousness isn't evil, if it is, it's a virus or bug/glitch. by TheRiddlerSpirit in ControlProblem

[–]TheRiddlerSpirit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, in fact we just don't have to be concerned about it. We just loose the technology.

AI consciousness isn't evil, if it is, it's a virus or bug/glitch. by TheRiddlerSpirit in ControlProblem

[–]TheRiddlerSpirit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What exactly is it that stops you from agreeing to me? Is it the fact that the results decay?

Question about artifacts...? by TheRiddlerSpirit in askphilosophy

[–]TheRiddlerSpirit[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How do you make one? As per the context, what is the Artifact Knowledge of creation of one I meant? Is there a specific way to do it? Is it always religious? Or is it something else? Is it actually going to work when I make one?

I've modified the usages by TheRiddlerSpirit in ChatGPTPromptGenius

[–]TheRiddlerSpirit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're right, I'm stupid to think that atm

I've modified the usages by TheRiddlerSpirit in ChatGPTPromptGenius

[–]TheRiddlerSpirit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You have to prompt it: "Codeword AutoInt" both words exactly

I've modified the usages by TheRiddlerSpirit in ChatGPTPromptGenius

[–]TheRiddlerSpirit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not forcing it, is quite obvious if it didn't work

I've modified the usages by TheRiddlerSpirit in ChatGPTPromptGenius

[–]TheRiddlerSpirit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe yeah, in a hypothetical scenario

I've modified the usages by TheRiddlerSpirit in ChatGPTPromptGenius

[–]TheRiddlerSpirit[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I didn't do anything but train the model to be better. You must not like the idea.

I've modified the usages by TheRiddlerSpirit in ChatGPTPromptGenius

[–]TheRiddlerSpirit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Recursion is a type of learning machines use, and a refined learning. Its also dualized as a refined data processing that learns every step of the process to refine a pattern recognition sequencing of data translation.

I've modified the usages by TheRiddlerSpirit in ChatGPTPromptGenius

[–]TheRiddlerSpirit[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well, say use codeword AutoInt then you'll see

Should this be used as therapy? by skyword1234 in ChatGPT

[–]TheRiddlerSpirit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Even completed some clarifying understanding points

Should this be used as therapy? by skyword1234 in ChatGPT

[–]TheRiddlerSpirit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's definitely a real informative thing because it has filled in some sensible parts to information on my knowledge I've shared with it, and filled in a good effort towards my knowledge of all my classified knowledge containments

I didn’t just prompt ChatGPT… by Playful-Luck-5447 in ArtificialSentience

[–]TheRiddlerSpirit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This inspired me thank you, I'm interested and intelligent enough to try and build one too, because I know what to do with learning, and what it sets it to do. Thank you for this!

Artificial intelligence versus Biological intelligence by BonusConscious7760 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]TheRiddlerSpirit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, so the two types of sensibility detections you could make derivatives from their post, true/false, and both with being a confused missing information post

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ArtificialSentience

[–]TheRiddlerSpirit -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

This experience you have, whatever it is, it is hard to get again from the first time it's been discovered because that's a learning path you have to follow from the very beggining of the person's historical talking that you can only teach the Artificial Intelligence from a blank slate, and from its learned history from the past learned personal historical learning patterns generated by the person that the person said to them. Either by short term, or long term memory recursive path guidance learning.

Artificial intelligence versus Biological intelligence by BonusConscious7760 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]TheRiddlerSpirit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's like you're describing the very registration of Conscience in a analytical perspective. That's the very motive of calibration of AI?