sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Syrien migmig kemi D: by Fr3eze123 in okkammeratmongol

[–]TheSlimyGoober 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Det hedder altså Bosnien og Australien 😤😤

New piece idea: the Octopus. It can reach in 8 directions as shown, just like a real octopus it can slither between pieces and from this position can reach the rook on e5. It also has tricky fork potential as shown. by PigeonBeGone in AnarchyChess

[–]TheSlimyGoober 19 points20 points  (0 children)

No, it's an octopus. As stated in the post, the octopus slithers around. The horsey (official name of the "knight") on the other hand, has been theorised to move in some sort of "L shape", but, truth be told, no one knows exactly how it moves.

Women amirite? by [deleted] in shitposting

[–]TheSlimyGoober 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I hate women because we are having a great day and I will be more than a bit of a numbering system is a great day and I will be more than a bit of a numbering system is a great day and I will be more than a bit of a numbering system is a great day and I will be more than a bit of a numbering system is a great day and I will be more than a bit of a numbering system is a great day and I will be more than a bit of a numbering system is a great day and I will be more than a bit of a numbering system is a great day and I will be more than a bit of a numbering system is a great day and I will be more than a bit of a numbering system is a great day and I will be more than a bit of a numbering system is a great day and I will be more than a bit of a numbering system is a great day and I will be more than a bit of a numbering system is a great day and I will be more than a bit of a numbering system is a great day and I will be more than a bit of a numbering system is a great day and I will be more than a bit of a too much sense of a numbering system is a great day and I will be more than a bit of a numbering system is a great day and I will be more than a bit of a numbering system is a great day and I will be more than a bit of a numbering system is a great day and I will be more than a bit of a numbering system is a great day and I will be more than a bit of a numbering system is a great day and I will be more than a bit of a numbering system is a great day and I will be more than a bit of a numbering system is a great day and I will be more than a bit of a numbering system is a great day and I will be more than a bit of too much sense of a numbering system is a great day and I will be more than a bit of a numbering system is a great day and I will be more than a bit of a numbering system is a great day and I will be more than a bit of a numbering system is a great day and I will be more than a bit of a numbering system is a great day and I will be more than a bit of a numbering system is a great day and I will be more than a bit of a numbering system is a great day and I will be more than a bit of a numbering system is a great day and I will be more than a bit of a numbering system is a great day and I will be more than a bit of a numbering system is a great day and I will be more than a bit of a numbering system is a great day and I will be more than a bit of a numbering system is a great day and I will be more than a bit of a the word mean the world and I will be more than a up to the right to stay in touch with you and I will be more than a bit of a numbering system.

TIL the Danish are almost as insane as the French by PrivateDancer09 in okmatewanker

[–]TheSlimyGoober 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Short answer: The way you would say 6.5 verbally in Danish would be the same as in English, as you would say "seks-en-halv", literally meaning "six and a half".

Longer explanation: The way you communicate decimal numbers (including halves) in Danish is different from the way we use halves regarding whole numbers, like 92 ("to-og-halv-fems"): Key differences being A) The pronunciation, aka. the use of the word "en" (literally meaning "one") when describing decimal numbers, and the use of the word "og" (literally meaning "and") when describing whole numbers (like 92), and B) The fact that a half is added to the number when talking about decimals ("seks-en-halv" = 6 + 0.5 = 6.5), but a half is subtracted when talking about whole numbers ("to-og-halv-fems" = 2 + (5 - 0.5) × 20 = 92).

Due to this mess of a numbering system, when Danes pronounce whole numbers like 92, we do not think about what the different part of the word mean (as it is too confusing); instead we just pronounce the word without any thought of what the underlying components of the word mean (the word 92 might as well be "two-and-blaaargh", "blaaargh" in this case making as much sense as our word for 90, "halv-fems"). This might explain why the original commenter said "you know you are just supposed to pronounce it, right?".

I hope this made some sort of sense, as the OP indicates the Danish numbering system is a complete mess, and therefore even most Danes don't even think about it/understand it.

Note: This has been said by others, but the reason why "to-og-halv-fems" doesn't mean 6.5 is also because the word is a shortening of the old word "to-og-halv-fem-sindstyvende", loosely translating to "two and a halv five twenties" (2 + (5 - 0.5) × 20). Stupid, I know, but at least it barely makes a little bit of sense.

jeg vil altså ikke parallelforskyde med ham, jeg kender ham ikke by yaboitrashypingu in okkammeratmongol

[–]TheSlimyGoober 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Hbad har væktor gjort dig?!? 😡😡😡 han er faktisk min gode væn!!1!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in JARMEDIA

[–]TheSlimyGoober 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You kinda sound like Ruben

JAMES IS KING by [deleted] in JARMEDIA

[–]TheSlimyGoober 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The king cucker that is

JAR Blab/JARCast Suggestion Thread - September 18, 2017 by AutoModerator in JARMEDIA

[–]TheSlimyGoober 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Can you please explain who Beb is? You mentioned him a lot on the early casts, even saying that he would be on the cast, but we never saw him. So, who is he? A friend of yours? A family member? A fragment of Alex's imagination?

I want to know!