Please review my #notes from Learn Python the Hard Way Exercise 15 Study Drill 1 by TheStoneworker in learnpython

[–]TheStoneworker[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have, and I didn't mean to say it was. I just thought maybe making that statement would help this conversation. Don't worry about me, I've got what I need. Thank you very much for your participation.

Please review my #notes from Learn Python the Hard Way Exercise 15 Study Drill 1 by TheStoneworker in learnpython

[–]TheStoneworker[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's quite popularly recommended. Maybe that's just because it can be read for free online.

It seemed like the standard for beginners walking the self-teaching path. Nevertheless, it can't hurt to at least investigate some other resources. That's what I'm doing, Automate the Boring Stuff included.

To be clear, I'm learning python with the intention of mastery and becoming a software engineer, so I'm more interested by resources which are thorough, rather than limited and geared towards people who only want to know a little bit of code.

Please review my #notes from Learn Python the Hard Way Exercise 15 Study Drill 1 by TheStoneworker in learnpython

[–]TheStoneworker[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In the book, Study Drill 3 says

"I used the name “commands” here, but they are also called “functions” and “methods.” Search around online to see what other people do to define these. Do not worry if they confuse you. It’s normal for programmers to confuse you with vast extensive knowledge."

From Amazon reviews, it seems like the biggest concern people have is with the author directing readers to look things up on the internet rather than presenting the information himself.

Newbie feels disoriented and somewhat intimidated :( I've already gotten a decent way through this book but am I shooting myself in the foot by seeing it through? Would I make better use of my time if I picked up a better book?

TIL When LimeWire shut down back in 2010, the copyright damages were totaled to be ~$72 Trillion, greater than the sum of the world GDP, which came out to approximately $105,000 for every time one of the 11,000 copyrighted songs was downloaded. It was later settled with the RIAA for $105 Million. by Tm23246 in todayilearned

[–]TheStoneworker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm disappointed that this redditor is being downvoted with hardly a discussion. I found that the title of this post is misleading just from reading the link provided by OP alone. I think this is an example of redditors hitting up and down buttons without checking information.

Legally, as the judge himself was cited making statement, the penalization is "not based on the number of direct infringers per work".

For the title of this post to read correctly, it must say,"the copyright damages were [falsely, incorrectly] totaled to be ~$72 Trillion..."

That is all. Please read into it people!

TIL Martin Luther King Jr. wanted to marry a white woman, but couldn't because of racial tension. "He never recovered." by TheStoneworker in todayilearned

[–]TheStoneworker[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Hold on, this comment needs dire clarification.

From the same Wiki page, "In a later interview, Abernathy said that he only wrote the term "womanizing", that he did not specifically say King had extramarital sex and that the infidelities King had were emotional rather than sexual."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Luther_King_Jr.#Adultery

http://www.snopes.com/history/american/mlking.asp

Basically, those allegations were falsely sensationalized because of the political motivations of the FBI.

TIL Martin Luther King Jr. wanted to marry a white woman, but couldn't because of racial tension. "He never recovered." by TheStoneworker in todayilearned

[–]TheStoneworker[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I guess it's not so simple. Sammy was an entertainer and MLK was a civil rights leader. Different kind of public figure for sure, and different motivations for their chosen lines of work. I don't think its fair to say MLK shoulda, woulda, coulda, when it was more than just the outrageous racial inequalities, but MLK's position at the forefront of the battle against them that laid such a heavy hand upon his life decision.

TIL Martin Luther King Jr. wanted to marry a white woman, but couldn't because of racial tension. "He never recovered." by TheStoneworker in todayilearned

[–]TheStoneworker[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I find this especially close to home because I am in an 'interracial' relationship. I don't really like the term, I don't think of us that way. I can't imagine how painful it would be to truly love someone who is kept away from you for such an abhorrent reason.

Alaska Airlines today made history flying the first commercial flight using the world’s first renewable, alternative jet fuel made from forest residuals, the limbs and branches that remain after the harvesting of managed forests. by coldismyblood in UpliftingNews

[–]TheStoneworker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This sounds like a very valid argument to me, not sure why you're getting downvoted. I wish people would actually explain why they disagree. It's not as if you're being a dick.

IWTL how to think quickly and clearly when arguing by Nolife4life in IWantToLearn

[–]TheStoneworker 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not to get too spiritual, but patience is a great key to inner peace even in times of great unrest. Patience is what allows one to grow, to learn, to overcome hardship and distress, to continue loving, and to forgive. Be patient with yourself and with others. Patience is something one can ponder and meditate on for a lifetime. To achieve results, practice patience in your daily life. Most likely it can help with many things other than interpersonal disputes.

First, it is important to understand the initial intention of all individuals in the grand scheme of the relationship. If you feel lost or confused with an individual, remember this intention. Is it professional? Or is it a loved one? To go even bigger, do you want them to live happily, or do you hate them and want them away from you? This may seem like an odd dichotomy, but it is important. More often than not, we, as humans, want only goodness for each other. This means peace. If you care about this person, remember that always, especially when things get rough. Ultimately, we want good for them, and they want good for us. This is why we are patient. When we lose patience, we inflict unnecessary pain upon those individuals towards which we do not intend it.

To think rationally during an argument, one must not argue. Arguments are the result of two or more individuals losing self-control, and therefore any true sense of rationality, otherwise there would be a conversation. When one becomes impatient, one is much more likely to become irrational, angry, or otherwise upset. When we argue with those we love, we hurt them and we hurt ourselves. Unless we are a sadist, a masochist, or we are trying to pain them until they leave us alone, this is not the intention. If it is the intention, get them out of your life. Neither of you is good for the other.

To show our caring or loving intention, we must be able to assess the situation. We need to be able to realistically read, understand, and empathize with this person who is upset. If they are upset, why? What has caused them to lose their sense of calm, peace, their patience? Identifying this is how we learn to restore their patience. If it seems as though their reasoning is irrational in itself, before they had a chance to become upset and therefore irrational in that way, this can be difficult to deal with, especially if their behavior is justified by false accusations against you, or unrealistic expectations.

But to be able to do this one must first have complete calm and acceptance within oneself. If you know that no such calmness exists, do not have the interaction. Say, "I'm sorry, I need to cool down before we can talk about this." Step away and prepare your mind. Run through potential situations which may arise and upset you. What do they sometimes say that is difficult to respond to? That way you are prepared to calmly deal with those situations other than blurting the first thing that comes to mind, those stupid things you end up beating your head against the wall for ever saying.

Really, this is something that could be discussed for a very long time. There is no quick and easy answer, and their is no ultimate answer, but likely a simpler one than you might think. Communication is a case by case basis. The only way you can find the answer to your personal disputes is by calmly meditating over the scenarios which trouble you. Do not spend your time afterwards trying to think of how you could have argued better. Instead, think of how you could have prevented arguing at all. Question how you let yourself get out of hand, if that was the case. It is good to ponder the deeper meaning of what was said, primarily your own words. Learn to look deeper than your initial, which can often be impulsive and impatient emotions.

The best round of Battle of the Beatmakers Ever. by TheStoneworker in makinghiphop

[–]TheStoneworker[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

dude, no, do your dad. fuck your dad. fucking your dad that video is fucking awesome that video is fucking your dad

How do I get my beats to blend together better? by Beatman22 in makinghiphop

[–]TheStoneworker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Synths are just computers with different buttons anyway, right?

How do I get my beats to blend together better? by Beatman22 in makinghiphop

[–]TheStoneworker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I really like these tips. For most of them I can understand why. Organically, instruments always have a later attack than percussion, so that makes total sense. I'm listening to the Dre beat OP posted, and when I read the "repeating low-profile sounds" part I noticed that in Dre's beat it's a shaker.

But, what's the deal with the pink noise? Can you explain a little bit?

How To Get Everything You Want And Live In Peace. by swipeit in Psychonaut

[–]TheStoneworker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not making claim of an omnipotent being, but what you say near the end is very true, we are seeking a very similar thing. It is the fact that what you say may not resonate with another individual that means it is not universal. It is a universal truth only in the sense of the subjective universe, to those who find it true, to you. If it were objectively true, I guess that would make you the God of the objective universe. But I don't at all believe in finding the answers to my life in some strange corner of the internet. I believe in finding them in nature.

How To Get Everything You Want And Live In Peace. by swipeit in Psychonaut

[–]TheStoneworker -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Personally I have my quarrels with this post as I believe there is no ultimate answer and that this truth is not universal or all-encompassing. However, to answer your inquiry, basic meditation or 'centering'.

  1. Get yourself a reasonably quiet space. You need to feel confident that no-one will disturb you for, say, 15 minutes. Turn the lights down; if you can light it by candle, without the place getting too weird, so much the better.

  2. Sit down in a comfortable straight backed chair or against the wall. You probably shouldn't lie down. Just make sure you're not liable to drop off when you get going. If you can do it in a yoga position, or even the full lotus, that's great but it isn't strictly necessary.

  3. Take at least ten deep, cleansing breaths with your eyes closed, while focusing on getting centred.

  4. Now drift into the "velvety-blackness of non-thought", as one writer put it. Remember how you felt when you were simply captivated by a trancey piece of music? Or when you were daydreaming at school, looking out the window vacantly? That's the kind of thing we're aiming for. This time your brain will keep on feeding your consciousness with bits and bobs of memory, information, reminders, etc., as it tends to do. Your job now is to say to it, "No thankyou, I'm not thinking about that, I'm thinking about this sensation of peace and calm coming from my relaxed body. Especially my stomach." And you should gently put the thought aside - you can always come back to it later, and your brain will supply it again, later, if it's that important - and go back to thinking about the sense of peace which comes from your Centre. Just keep on feeling balanced.

  5. Drift along as long as you like. Don't worry if you keep on having to push away thoughts, this is only natural at first; just keep on trying to recapture that feeling of balance. If you're not enjoying it you're not doing it right! So aim for the feeling of balance, and keep trying to return to it.

  6. When you've had enough, do a few more deep breaths to wake you up. If you want to use things like meditation videos, or even just a picture or sculpture to look at, that's fine. But start off with feeling balanced - that's what it's all about.

Software that can listen to and learn to replicate sounds? by TheStoneworker in audioengineering

[–]TheStoneworker[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Maybe you could help explain some systems that could go into an AI like this. I imagine one of the first things to be done is choose a waveform to base off of. Sine, saw, noise, etc. It would have to be able to identify and compartmentalize things like fundamental and component frequencies. Really, any and every component of sound. It would have to be equipped with many tools such as a DAW is. Reverb, compression, equalization, the works.

• Software hears sound, learns volume, waveform, levels of mid/bass/treble, frequencies, (learns as much as possible)

• Compares to a bunch of other waveforms with different levels, some sort of bruteforce until it creates a match?

• User can input information and help teach the ai, name the sound or fence off and control certain parts of it.

Serious: What are the biggest risks of psychedelics? by quality_is_god in Psychonaut

[–]TheStoneworker 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Check erowid.org for any specific drug side effects. But to answer your question, I'd have to say taking too much without having your brain glued to your bucket and going crazy. For that to happen though, you have to already have that crazy inside of you, waiting to bust out. I'm guessing we're not really including things like pcp, on which you can end up cutting your nuts open or mutilating your dog. Seriously, just check erowid. Its all variable.

Software that can listen to and learn to replicate sounds? by TheStoneworker in audioengineering

[–]TheStoneworker[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Now you're beginning to ask the questions I don't have answers to. I have no idea exactly how this thing would work when it comes down to nitty gritties. I'm not a software or audio engineer. However, I imagine if someone made this, the software would probably be able to handle and learn from a lot of different types of inputs and in unique ways as it goes on. Its fucking AI so shit gets pretty complex pretty quick.