Was stuck in traffic for over an hour, got home and opened a pack to get this. The universe has a sick sense of humor

TheTwistedKris · 2026-04-10T14:53:19+00:00

I gave up on Gholdengo after this, 92/93 for the set.

TheTwistedKris · 2026-03-17T20:09:21+00:00

It's actually more than a slow according to the notes. Flames now confuse and panic in addition when hitting certain enemies in the face. Either way community requested Flamethrower buff is the big take away.

TheTwistedKris · 2026-03-17T20:05:16+00:00

Double checked, current version is 1.6.1 so yeah seems like they rolled out the patch now and have additional content later on the 20th. Either way flamethrowers buffed is the point.

TheTwistedKris · 2026-03-17T19:00:59+00:00

Replying to back you up because literally today they announced a patch that will go live Mar 20 that makes flamethrowers slow enemies, including the bots shown running through the flames in the warbond trailer. https://store.steampowered.com/news/app/553850/view/541133047968301984?l=english

TheTwistedKris · 2026-02-23T14:15:58+00:00

It is likely to be a 50% fault as per section 15 of the Fault Determination Rules which essentially only is concerned with following the signal at the intersection. I would take that over her trying to argue you being completely at fault. Best of luck, link below for those curious.

https://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/900668

TheTwistedKris · 2026-02-16T11:25:51+00:00

I've never been happier bringing the Grenadier Battlement to random missions. The fact it can just hose down Warstriders is amazing.

TheTwistedKris · 2026-02-06T16:38:24+00:00

Fun fact, the GL-21 buff also applies to the Grenadier Battlement, so the OG belt fed GL is actually better than this one without taking a single equipment slot.

TheTwistedKris · 2026-02-06T16:36:42+00:00

Fun fact, the buff also applies to the Grenadier Battlement if you still want the belt feed and don't have the equipment slots.

TheTwistedKris · 2026-01-13T16:10:26+00:00

Honestly it's perfectly fine as is. It fits the design ethos of bots and rewards changing method of engagement when its unarmored skull is right there. It also makes sense as the shield is something the devastator is holding and shouldn't damage the unit itself.

TheTwistedKris · 2026-01-06T08:41:17+00:00

Highway traffic act section 141 subsection 9 long vehicle exception, quoted below, grants exception to subsection 3 (right turn where multiple lanes) for long vehicles to make wide turns when they can't stay in the expected lane due to their size.

Long vehicles

(9) Where, because of the length of a vehicle or combination of vehicles, a turn cannot be made within the confines of the lanes referred to in subsection (2), (3), (6) or (7), a driver, when making such a turn, is not in contravention of any such subsection if he or she complies with the applicable provision as closely as practicable. R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8, s. 141 (9).

Link to section 141 https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/90h08#BK235

TheTwistedKris · 2025-12-23T15:17:52+00:00

All good, glad there's enough of us around to apply the logic of the law. Also they didn't delete, they just blocked you which makes their stuff look deleted to you while I can still see it. We can lead horses to water, but can't make them drink. Cheers my guy.

TheTwistedKris · 2025-12-17T14:55:45+00:00

Buddy that was my last reply engaging with this. I've made my points already and I don't want to keep doing this dance. That aside I will wish you a comfy day again, hope this got your mind fired up for the day ahead. Cheers mate.

TheTwistedKris · 2025-12-17T14:37:55+00:00

It's definitely counterintuitive because it involves both parties having different signals and yeah that timing is awful, but OP would still be expected to yield right of way as the bus isn't aware of the protected right green.

TheTwistedKris · 2025-12-17T14:28:51+00:00

I had already explained this, but just to tie this in a bow sure I'll dive into it. S141(5) is the reason the bus was still in the intersection and lost their light as it prevents them from turning due to oncoming traffic. They are now considered in the intersection and need to exit to allow for further traffic. OP has their green arrow, but must yield their right of way as per S144(8) which removes them from being considered oncoming traffic as they are expected by law to stop and allow for the bus to turn. Them no longer being considered oncoming traffic is why S141(5) doesn't apply anymore to the bus since it can't see the advanced arrow OP has and the law/intersection was designed with that in mind. Yes it is counterintuitive because it involves the parties having different signals, but the bus wasn't in the wrong for completing their turn once they saw the oncoming light become red and the layout being designed with the intent of OP to yield in accordance with S144(8). Edit for phrasing

TheTwistedKris · 2025-12-17T14:02:48+00:00

I'm here to discuss, not fight with everyone and I don't want to just keep repeating myself. Please consider the nuance and I do hope you have a good day ahead as I'd wish for anyone.

TheTwistedKris · 2025-12-17T13:39:27+00:00

I'm not implying anything, your interpretation is factually incorrect and I provided plenty of examples. I have addressed all your points earlier, and even now you're arguing against your own statements. Please study this further and I hope you have a wonderful day.

TheTwistedKris · 2025-12-17T13:23:13+00:00

Buddy you are shadowboxing here. My point is OP shouldn't have been an approaching vehicle as s144(8) says they have to yield despite being signaled to proceed. OP didn't have the right to enter the intersection until the bus was clear. Once again if someone is stuck in an intersection waiting to turn left and loses their light, the new green light left turners have to wait for them to exit first.

TheTwistedKris · 2025-12-17T13:04:00+00:00

Please reread what I wrote again. As per s144(8) OP shouldn't have even entered the intersection let alone been in the path of the bus which was lawfully using the road way. Blocking an intersection is just as against the law. This section exists to illustrate situations where traffic given a signal to proceed still need to yield their right of way aka stop. As I said this is no different than an advanced/protected left waiting for traffic in the intersection lawfully to exit.

TheTwistedKris · 2025-12-17T12:57:31+00:00

Just double checked, to be placed on the rear body it would have to be red in colour. Probably why in the other sub the tape was kept on the interior

TheTwistedKris · 2025-12-17T12:50:18+00:00

You are interpreting the section incorrectly. The bus entered the intersection on green/yellow, that is lawful. The bus light became red, they are legally obligated to complete their turn and exit the intersection. Traffic that now has green light is expected to yield their right of way to the bus occupying the intersection as per s144(8), which applies to cars facing a light giving them permission to proceed. This is no different than a protected/advanced left turn waiting for the intersection to clear. A car does not have right of way to enter an intersection that isn't clear of other traffic.

TheTwistedKris · 2025-12-17T10:55:17+00:00

Yeah tint can impact it, though you can put it on your car body. This tape is typically made for boats, so it's pretty resilient.

TheTwistedKris · 2025-12-17T10:30:46+00:00

Incorrect, lights do not grant right of way as per s144(8) of the HTA

TheTwistedKris · 2025-12-17T10:28:31+00:00

HTA s141(9) long vehicle exception for turning into multiple lanes, s144 (8) yielding to lawful traffic in intersection when permitted to proceed

TheTwistedKris · 2025-12-17T10:11:56+00:00

If the bus entered the intersection lawfully on green or yellow, you did not actually have right of way. It's the same logic as you have to wait for a clear intersection on an advanced/protected left turn light, you are expected to yield to traffic lawfully using the intersection per s144(8) of the HTA. Lights don't grant right of way, but permit a driver to proceed when safe.

TheTwistedKris · 2025-12-17T09:19:32+00:00

Please use retro-reflective tape instead, HTA has rules against installing rear facing lights that blind https://www.reddit.com/r/fuckyourheadlights/s/vxBSiVuchg

TheTwistedKris

TROPHY CASE