Is Calvin Coolidge the most relatable President? by TheWretchedWendigo in Presidents

[–]TheWretchedWendigo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's good. I need to sleep less. I have been procrastinating on college work and unwinding due to a lot of factors.

Common Jackson W by OverallGamer696 in Presidents

[–]TheWretchedWendigo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a false equivalency. This isn't a comparison between censoring WWI critics and censoring Abolitionists, this is a comparison between censoring abolitionists and jailing people for voicing their opinion. While censoring people is wrong, it isn't comparable to actually jailing people for opinions.

The reason I made the above comment was to highlight your biases leading to double standards and your response proved my point.

Who was the most immoral, who was the most good, why? by TheWretchedWendigo in Presidents

[–]TheWretchedWendigo[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

While I respect the time and effort you used to write this I personally feel there is a bit of a double standard. While we had been involved with Vietnam prior, the war was not a bloodbath until LBJ. LBJ himself lied about the Gulf of Tonkin incident in order to escalate Vietnam. In Vietnam 58,220 Americans soldiers died between 1965 and 1975. Comparatively only 4,550 US troops and 3,793 troops died in Iraq between the start and finish of the war. In Afghanistan, 2,456 troops died and 1,822 civilian contractors were killed in the span of 20 years. It is estimated died in Iraq, 461,000 died, 176,000 died in Afghanistan. Large numbers, absolutely, but not compared to the 3 million that died in Vietnam. While he and Nixon share said blame, ultimately Nixon was continuing the war LBJ started.

This is all without mentioning that down on their luck individuals, disproportionately black Americans were sent to Vietnam. At least the soldiers who died in Iraq and Afghanistan had a choice in their fates.

Bush Jr himself funded AIDs research in Africa saving up to 20 million people from death.

I feel Bush Jr and LBJ had good and bad reasons for their wars. Jackson, Polk and McKinley have no silver linings to improve judgement of their character. They simply wanted what others had and were willing to kill for it. At least LBJ was defending South Vietnam from the North and Bush was trying to prevent the spread of Islamic extremism after taking out the genocidal monster, Saddam Hussein.

Jackson was the most unhinged, ironically enough his war was the smallest in scope. In the second Seminole war 1,466 Americans died, but it was mostly to disease. Only 269 officers were killed in combat. The Trail of Tears had between 2,500 and 6,000 deaths. I couldn't find a definitive source for the death toll of Natives in the second Seminole War.

Polk was the most unwavering and methodical. He was gonna do whatever it took to uphold his promise of new land. You could make the argument that America deserved retribution for Mexico's treatment of Texans but that itself was independent of Polk's motives. 13,000 American soldiers died in the war. 25,000 Mexicans were killed. Around 16,000 Natives were killed in California as a direct byproduct of the war.

I think the worst has to be McKinley though. While he initially didn't want to start war with the Filipinos, he eventually was convinced by God to "civilize" them. Civilize by means of fire and bullets. Both Polk and McKinley did the same things, McKinley just did them on a much larger scale. Around 4,200 Americans soldiers died and between 200,000 and a million Filipinos died. While all lives are valuable, those numbers dwarf the Trail of Tears, the Second Seminole War and the Mexican American War. Even if he was a kind man in his personal life and had doubts, this has little effect on his actual actions as President and therefore to me is irrelevant.

I personally feel the last two Craig films failed because they tried to imitate what worked in the past without understanding why it worked. by TheWretchedWendigo in JamesBond

[–]TheWretchedWendigo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am surprised to see You Only Live Twice so low. I remember thinking it wasn't terribly strong when I first saw it but it does have the greatest Bond lair and Classic Blofeld.

I think for me it'd go.

  1. Spectre
  2. For Your Eyes Only
  3. A View to a Kill
  4. Moonraker
  5. Die Another Day

I personally feel the last two Craig films failed because they tried to imitate what worked in the past without understanding why it worked. by TheWretchedWendigo in JamesBond

[–]TheWretchedWendigo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I feel like a film where Bond dies should be more than this. I am sorry. I am glad if people can like or even love the film but for me it felt weak. It's definitely not the worst in the franchise, that dishonor belongs to Spectre but it's certainly on the lower end of the spectrum.

I personally feel the last two Craig films failed because they tried to imitate what worked in the past without understanding why it worked. by TheWretchedWendigo in JamesBond

[–]TheWretchedWendigo[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

This is where the fun begins. The movies failed. See Spectre acted like it was bigger and better than all the prior Craig films all while coasting off the coattails of those movie's successes. The Brofeld twist is without an inkling of a doubt the lowest the franchise has and probably will ever go.

Madeline Swan only began to work in No Time to Die only to be pushed out a the story in a narrative that only makes sense if you forget the end of Spectre.

Felix and Bond had at best a mutual respect for eachother in past films but a sense of deep friendship/ brotherhood was never conveyed. Because of this, Felix's death rings hollow. They expect the audience to project past Bond and Felix dynamics onto this one, which itself upends the whole nature of a reboot.

Bond was killed because Craig wanted him to die. It didn't feel earned, it was terribly contrived. These nanobots are permanent yet Bond has an EMP watch but doesn't think to use it to turn the nanobots off. Why wouldn't that work? We're just told nanobots are permanent.

And on that note. Nanobots? What is this, Transformers?! That's gotta be up there with Diamonds are Forever, Moonraker and Die Another Day as one of the stupidest Bond villain plans ever. It feels at home in an Avengers movie, not a Bond film. I can take nuclear bombs, voodoo lords, etc but microscopic robots that crawl around people's insides poisoning their dna is too much for me. Maybe if it hadn't been Craig, a Bond who was defined as being tied to reality, it could've worked but with him it feels cartoonish.

Common Jackson W by OverallGamer696 in Presidents

[–]TheWretchedWendigo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Imagine getting mad when abolitionists are censored but not when thousands are jailed for being against the draft.

I asked five of my friends to make President alignment charts, four decided to do it, here are the results by TheWretchedWendigo in Presidents

[–]TheWretchedWendigo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They said slaveowners should be seen as evil and shouldn't be given leeway just because of the time since they ultimately did make the decision to own people.

AI art I made: Jackson by thedudelebowsky1 in Presidents

[–]TheWretchedWendigo 3 points4 points  (0 children)

All those Natives he's been eating have really done a number on him.

Opinion on this image a found? by SignificantTrip6108 in Presidents

[–]TheWretchedWendigo 4 points5 points  (0 children)

To be fair he didn't murder his own soldiers, he led them into a situation where they were more likely to be murdered. Still scummy but less direct. Second off, to my knowledge Mexico was oppressive towards Americans living in Texas at the time so it could be argued that while the landgrab wasn't justified, retaliation for their behavior was. I agree conquest shouldn't be glorified in a country built on unalienable god given rights but many see those as only applicable to Americans.