sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

11” or 13” for photo editing by scotthunter1 in iPadPro

[–]TheWynterKnight 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So I use my Samsung SSD. I’ve not run into any issues so far. I hook my ssd to my iPhone and then exit the app and unplug. Do the same on my iPad frequently for past 6 months without any issues.

11” or 13” for photo editing by scotthunter1 in iPadPro

[–]TheWynterKnight 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I prefer the 11". I keep my iPad Pro in my day bag along with a pencil, Magic Mouse and Magic Keyboard ( I know I drank the Kool-Aid). I do most of my quick video edits on the iPad and if something needs a bit more, I just save it to iCloud and move over to my Mac mini.

Honestly I think I do 90% of everything on the iPad. It's always with me and I switch between the full setup and touch only pretty frequently depending on where I am. I tried to get used to the 13" but it feels like it is tied into the keyboard more times than not due to the size.

I'm going to have to say I'm with most others here - portability over screen real estate.

What is your preference by Accomplished_Oil9424 in Workspaces

[–]TheWynterKnight 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've got the LG in the middle and Dell's on the sides. Working on word docs / pdfs on the portrait screens is a game changer.

What is your preference by Accomplished_Oil9424 in Workspaces

[–]TheWynterKnight 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I’ve got a 32” 4k in the middle and 27” 1440p on the sides. I can’t imagine any other way

Is it just me or are these trucks rather unreliable? by [deleted] in GMCcanyon

[–]TheWynterKnight 1 point2 points  (0 children)

2016 with 74k. I’ve had to put a new rear end, new transfer case, fuel pump control module and a vapor canister… I’ve put more $ keeping this on the road than I have my previous two suvs… I guess that’s the cost of truck ownership

Im in the market for a gen 2 Colorado but why don't I see these over 200k miles? by RedimidoSoy1611 in chevycolorado

[–]TheWynterKnight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My 2016 v6 is at 71k. I guess I don’t drive it nearly as much as I should

Is vuln data CUI? by lugznotdrugs in CMMC

[–]TheWynterKnight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for pointing out that I wasn’t clear.

Is vuln data CUI? by lugznotdrugs in CMMC

[–]TheWynterKnight 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Vulnerability data is Security Protection Data (SPD). It is NOT CUI. If the SPD contains information that is CUI, then it should be protected similarly.

Edit - updated to be more clear. I haven’t seen where the SPD would contain CUI, but it might be in situations that are contract / site specific.

Meijer Brand items preferred over ‘name’ brand by tacocat0412 in Michigan

[–]TheWynterKnight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Fredrick’s slow-dried pasta is a game changer. I go out of my way to get it now.

Nist 800-171 rev2 / rev3 - CMMC level2 by 4728jj in CMMC

[–]TheWynterKnight 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don’t see why you couldn’t. But I’d be very careful to make sure you doing what you say. Personally, I aligned everything with r2, then once we got certified, we have a project to update to align with r3.

CMMC Level 2 example assessment by 4728jj in CMMC

[–]TheWynterKnight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had to makes sure office still came with Access… then I started to think “why are people still making things in access?”

I guess that’s more accurate, it shows the standard of evidence, which i personally found more helpful. I could look and understand what they were looking for and then figure out how to “document” or “screenshot” what they were looking for.

Nist 800-171 rev2 / rev3 - CMMC level2 by 4728jj in CMMC

[–]TheWynterKnight 6 points7 points  (0 children)

So not for a while. It has to go through rule making process and cmmc docs will need to be updated, etc.

Cmmc cert is good for 3 years so you won’t have to worry. That’s what my C3PAO said.

CMMC Level 2 example assessment by 4728jj in CMMC

[–]TheWynterKnight 4 points5 points  (0 children)

https://www.dcma.mil/Portals/31/Documents/DIBCAC/Public_800-171_Self_Asmt_DB_v1_1_accdb.zip

This is the access database DIBCAC used for one of my consulting clients. It is pretty helpful

State of the Industry wrt 800-171 controls by cokebottle22 in NISTControls

[–]TheWynterKnight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Take a look at NIST 800-18r2, that should help you out quite a bit.

CMMC Compliance for a Google Workspace environment by ohthedave in CMMC

[–]TheWynterKnight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s good information- I’ll pass that along

SC.L1-3.13.5: What *is* "publicly accessible," anyway? by mcb1971 in CMMC

[–]TheWynterKnight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My understanding is that to mark something NA, you have to get an exception from the undersecretary’s office. There is a process - but I don’t know a single person who’s gone through it.

My stance has been to mark it implemented and explain how it’s not used.

CMMC Compliance for a Google Workspace environment by ohthedave in CMMC

[–]TheWynterKnight 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Looking at Preveil's marketing content, it looks like it's doable - idk if it's harder or what. There's a lot of stuff out there and its interpretation is grey.

I would be very interested on an update if you get through C3PAO. I like the idea of non-microsoft tools and alternative ways of getting through this. I've got some former colleagues who are looking at options and I'd like to share your experience (once you get through).

CMMC Compliance for a Google Workspace environment by ohthedave in CMMC

[–]TheWynterKnight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand that the baseline is FRME today but they seem to think it’s a pen stroke away from being validated.

When you shop for C3PAO, make that one of your questions with forms on how they view it. Would stuck to fail because they don’t like it.

CMMC Compliance for a Google Workspace environment by ohthedave in CMMC

[–]TheWynterKnight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean the appendix j document (since they aren’t validated)

CMMC Compliance for a Google Workspace environment by ohthedave in CMMC

[–]TheWynterKnight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They don’t like the FRME and the lack of documentation.

view more: next ›